It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The FBI Director responded by revising and clarifying his assessment, acknowledging that of the three email in question (originally reported as two emails by the New York Times), there were errors their classification markings which had nothing to do with Hillary Clinton and therefore could not have been her fault.
originally posted by: butcherguy
a reply to: Gryphon66
Thanks for playing.
Hillary looks at it all as a game too.
But hers is a money game.
originally posted by: imitator
The Diaper Queen has Loretta E. Lynch and the FBI are on her side, It doesn't matter if it's against the law for Hillary to discuss classified information on unsecured networks servers after leaving the State Dept... after all she is the Queen of her protectors aka the diaper babies.... Again I'm sure they will cry about how innocent she is. pft....
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: bknapple32
originally posted by: butcherguy
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: butcherguy
Common citizen that has no business sending it.
Did Clinton lose her security clearance? Ball's in your court.
Doesn't matter that she does have a security clearance.
I have one too.
Should I be emailing classified information from a non-secure server?
I have no business sending it because I don't work for the government any more. Neither does she.
Cmon. Its one thing to pointlessly debate these hillary emails. Its another to compare *your* security clearance to the former sec of state. Talk about Trump koolaid.
You need to stay in touch.
I don't like Trump.... other than he is screwing the Republican Party.
Go drink your Hillary Koolaid, and work on your backflip.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
Yeah you left out the part where he stated marked or not she should have known better.
You also left out the 110 that were marked that she sent for which she was not charged.
Also, like the questions about perjury, was this email in the scope of the investigation. Comey stated the fbi had a very narrow scope in the investigation they conducted.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Gryphon66
I believe what he said. I may not agree with it, but I think the fbi completed a fair investigation of what they were tasked with investigating.
No charges for what was investigated.
That is why I asked if this email was in the scope of that investigation. If it was this is not an issue.
originally posted by: bknapple32
Hillary emails 2016 = Obama birth certificate 2008/2012
They are using the 'Oh there's nothing to this!' excuse.
originally posted by: imitator
a reply to: Gryphon66
Actually there are dozens of emails that I know of exchanged between the Diaper Queen and President Obummer that are being withheld.... their excuse, to preserve presidential communications BS.... when we all know it was classified info..... The diaper babies will never let these emails see daylight.