It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
That's not really going to change the law though; plus he's already doing that. It's just going to shoot Obama's pardon count through the roof (which is already higher than the last 7 Presidents).
President Obama Has Now Commuted the Sentences of 348 Individuals
Today, the President announced 42 additional grants of clemency to men and women serving years in prison under outdated and unduly harsh sentencing laws. The individuals receiving a presidential commutation today have more than repaid their debt to society and earned this second chance.
To date, the President has commuted the sentences of 348 individuals -- more than the previous seven Presidents combined. He remains committed to using his clemency power throughout the remainder of the Administration to give more deserving individuals that same second chance.
Don't get me wrong. The above is AWESOME and I hope he continues to do this, but it isn't an actual solution to the problem. Just a stop-gap method or bandaid.
originally posted by: roadgravel
a reply to: imsoconfused
Research how the US government functions. It may have been taught in school on a day you were not there.
Maybe Obama made you miss school that day.
If I were saying all of this about W. 9 years ago you would be agreeing with me completely.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
What's breathtaking is you dragging Obama into this issue for no reason.
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
Actually I am just talking about weed. for now . But what I choose to smoke, drink, snort, mainline, swallow or shove up my ass is my business and the government needs to stay the hell out of it.
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
You know thats like 70% of our prison population right?
Myth: Prisons are full of people in for marijuana possession
Fact: About 750,000 people are arrested every year for marijuana offenses in the U.S. There's a lot of variation across states in what happens next. Not all arrests lead to prosecutions, and relatively few people prosecuted and convicted of simple possession end up in jail. Most are fined or are placed into community supervision. About 40,000 inmates of state and federal prison have a current conviction involving marijuana, and about half of them are in for marijuana offenses alone; most of these were involved in distribution. Less than one percent are in for possession alone.
And no he would still be in jail for rape. I would be fine with them dropping the possession charge.
originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
What's breathtaking is you dragging Obama into this issue for no reason.
Obama's DEA / FDA / etc. Marijuana Prohibition is on him. He's had 8 years to undo it, but hasn't. It proves this idea he cares about anybody, blacks in particular, is a SHAM.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
Actually I am just talking about weed. for now . But what I choose to smoke, drink, snort, mainline, swallow or shove up my ass is my business and the government needs to stay the hell out of it.
I agree. I want to end the war on drugs too, but sorting the people solely in jail for drugs from the others is rather hard. That's why Obama's number is only in the 300's so far. Keep in mind that his numbers are STILL higher than the last seven other Presidents. So you can't say he is doing nothing. He's done more than any other President since the WoD was ramped up by Nixon and then Reagan.
originally posted by: Sremmos80
a reply to: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
And you are ignoring that even if he did this guy would still be in trouble! Literally has nothing to do with this outside of you just reaching to find a way to blame obama...
Aldo you might want to look into who has been fighting him on it. Oh and the outrage every time he does something using his pen and phone.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
You know thats like 70% of our prison population right?
You are just the king of citing incorrect and non-sourced information aren't you? Here's the third time I'm going to correct you in this thread. It's not even Close to 70%
Myth: Prisons are full of people in for marijuana possession
Fact: About 750,000 people are arrested every year for marijuana offenses in the U.S. There's a lot of variation across states in what happens next. Not all arrests lead to prosecutions, and relatively few people prosecuted and convicted of simple possession end up in jail. Most are fined or are placed into community supervision. About 40,000 inmates of state and federal prison have a current conviction involving marijuana, and about half of them are in for marijuana offenses alone; most of these were involved in distribution. Less than one percent are in for possession alone.
Hell, even if you count everyone in jail for ALL drug possessions it only raises to 50%
And no he would still be in jail for rape. I would be fine with them dropping the possession charge.
We don't do selective pardoning in this country.
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
It's actually not as easy as you suggest for the President to do that:
Can The President End Federal Marijuana Prohibition Himself? Probably Not.
[Yet, Mark Kleiman, a highly respected expert in drug policy insists that simply Rescheduling is largely meaningless, and the ability to end federal marijuana prohibition requires an act of Congress.
If the DEA Administrator decided that the drug had “accepted medical use,” that would move it to Schedule II, making cannabis legally available by prescription. Selling it without a prescription would remain the same crime it is today. (Recall that coc aine and methamphetamine are Schedule II drugs.)
But prescriptions can only be written for FDA-approved drugs. And the FDA can’t approve “marijuana,” because “marijuana” isn’t something that can be put through clinical trials. The New Drug Application would have to be for a specific cannabis preparation, to be given in a specific dosage regimen via a specific route of administration for the treatment of a specific condition. That “new drug” could be a single molecule a combination, an herbal preparation, or an extract. In any case, it would have to have a known and reproducible chemical composition and be produced using “Good Manufacturing Practice.” Producing cannabis without FDA approval would still be the illegal manufacture of a Schedule II controlled substance.]
[Again, Kleiman insists that what advocates almost certainly are asking for is an explicit exemption from the Federal drug schedules, which requires rewriting the law, not just reclassification:
Alcohol and tobacco, both highly abusable drugs with no accepted medical use, would be Schedule I, but they are explicitly exempted in the text of the law:
The term [controlled substance] does not include distilled spirits, wine, malt beverages, or tobacco.]
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
Actually I am just talking about weed. for now . But what I choose to smoke, drink, snort, mainline, swallow or shove up my ass is my business and the government needs to stay the hell out of it.
I agree. I want to end the war on drugs too, but sorting the people solely in jail for drugs from the others is rather hard. That's why Obama's number is only in the 300's so far. Keep in mind that his numbers are STILL higher than the last seven other Presidents. So you can't say he is doing nothing. He's done more than any other President since the WoD was ramped up by Nixon and then Reagan.
Honestly 300 is a joke when over 750,000 people a year are arrested for weed, and 80% of those is simple possession. Just because it is more than other presidents doesn't make it any less of a travesty.
I was hoping Obama would change that but lets be honest he has not done sh!t.
I would vote for a half black half Mexican bisexual transgender democrepublican who was born in North Korea if it would just end the drug war.
originally posted by: imsoconfused
a reply to: Sremmos80
Distribution is a different beast than possession.
Why? How can you be pro legalization but say distribution should be illegal? I mean wtf?
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
originally posted by: imsoconfused
originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: imsoconfused
Pardoning everyone would be a mistake. Not everyone in jail for drugs are solely in jail for drugs. What about all the violent criminals? Would you want a rapist to get off just because when he was arrested for rape he was also charged with marijuana possession?
You know thats like 70% of our prison population right?
You are just the king of citing incorrect and non-sourced information aren't you? Here's the third time I'm going to correct you in this thread. It's not even Close to 70%
Myth: Prisons are full of people in for marijuana possession
Fact: About 750,000 people are arrested every year for marijuana offenses in the U.S. There's a lot of variation across states in what happens next. Not all arrests lead to prosecutions, and relatively few people prosecuted and convicted of simple possession end up in jail. Most are fined or are placed into community supervision. About 40,000 inmates of state and federal prison have a current conviction involving marijuana, and about half of them are in for marijuana offenses alone; most of these were involved in distribution. Less than one percent are in for possession alone.
Hell, even if you count everyone in jail for ALL drug possessions it only raises to 50%
And no he would still be in jail for rape. I would be fine with them dropping the possession charge.
We don't do selective pardoning in this country.
That is quoting prisons alone. Not jails. people do 30 days or go to jail for a night or a weekend all the time for simple possession alone.
Do I really need to source that. I went to jail for it.
But keep defending the drug laws i know you would rather be right than happy.