Freemason's link to Hillsborough investigated by IPCC

a reply to: TerryDon79

Actually it is in another language, you are still avoiding my question;;" Why are you talking about something you are not a part of? Isnt it better to just lay out an opinion if you arent sure? "

a reply to: tikbalang

Archaeologists and historians weren't alive at the time they're talking about. They speak about what they know through what they've studied.

It's called educating yourself on a subject.

Plus, stepfather and friends have been (and some stil are) Freemasons.

But I guess you know better than Freemasons themselves and people who have actually taken the time to study it, rather than getting bad information from biased websites, right?

a reply to: TerryDon79

So its storytelling your basing your facts on since you cant make any claims to it`?

Then make it into an opinion, and i just wanted others to understand when they read this thread;"

Terrydon79 is not a mason but he acts like he is one "

a reply to: tikbalang

No, it's called history and fact. Just like we know there was a fire in London in 1666. How do we know? People wrote things down (btw, that's called recorded history). Same with freemasonry, people wrote stuff down. Unlike gypsie history, which are stories based on opinions with nothing to back them up.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Actually, craftmanship does leave a stinking trace behind, etymology and cultural heritage also.. Words sometimes bite back..

Still have no clue what the "1666" reference has to do with this.. And you are still not a mason

** ATTENTION **

Last chance. Get on topic or be Post Banned.

The topic isn't each other.

a reply to: LucianusXVII
Nice double standard.

You keep talking of skeletons, and how they are supposedly our secrets, but provide no proof to back it up.

a reply to: AugustusMasonicus
They were besties, don't you know?