Julian Assange to appear on Fox with Megyn Kelly

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah, he's definitely not ruling out that Seth Rich was the leak and all but saying 'yes'. And really, not outright denying it makes no sense unless he is using the story to bolster his exposure.

Or, uh, his leverage to stay protected where he is.

What if he really doesn't have anything?

I read your posts and can only conclude you are stoned and or drunk most of the time. Just an observation.

Why?

Because I don't fall in step?

No... Because I live with a habitual stoner/alcoholic and she has similar views...

Now that's brilliant.

While I do like my scotch, I've never done drugs.

What views exactly are they?

Never mind, I see how you are connected. Carry on...

That's it?

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah, he's definitely not ruling out that Seth Rich was the leak and all but saying 'yes'. And really, not outright denying it makes no sense unless he is using the story to bolster his exposure.

Or, uh, his leverage to stay protected where he is.

What if he really doesn't have anything?

I read your posts and can only conclude you are stoned and or drunk most of the time. Just an observation.

Why?

Because I don't fall in step?

No... Because I live with a habitual stoner/alcoholic and she has similar views...

Now that's brilliant.

While I do like my scotch, I've never done drugs.

What views exactly are they?

Never mind, I see how you are connected. Carry on...

That's it?

it is clear.. yes.. Carry on.

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: ghostrager
a reply to: IAMTAT

Yeah, he's definitely not ruling out that Seth Rich was the leak and all but saying 'yes'. And really, not outright denying it makes no sense unless he is using the story to bolster his exposure.

Or, uh, his leverage to stay protected where he is.

What if he really doesn't have anything?

I read your posts and can only conclude you are stoned and or drunk most of the time. Just an observation.

Why?

Because I don't fall in step?

No... Because I live with a habitual stoner/alcoholic and she has similar views...

Now that's brilliant.

While I do like my scotch, I've never done drugs.

What views exactly are they?

Never mind, I see how you are connected. Carry on...

That's it?

it is clear.. yes.. Carry on.

To who?

Or is it whom?

Moving on . . . .

a reply to: Annee

I WAS SAYING IT WAS SILLY YOU WERE BEING CALLED THAT.

Now I'm starting to believe it. (Not that its a bad thing)

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

No, just that you must be a boozin' pothead because somebody else in real life reminds someone by your forums persona.

Sorry, never a drug user, did no indulge in pot.

Wanna try again?

Guess you have no excuse then. Sorry..

HA HA HA HA HA

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

I WAS SAYING IT WAS SILLY YOU WERE BEING CALLED THAT.

Now I'm starting to believe it. (Not that its a bad thing)

OK.

Truce

And Assange revealed????

What. What did he have to say?

a reply to: Sillyolme

That's what I'm waiting for.

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Orionx2

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: IgnoranceIsntBlisss
a reply to: Annee

No, just that you must be a boozin' pothead because somebody else in real life reminds someone by your forums persona.

Sorry, never a drug user, did no indulge in pot.

Wanna try again?

Guess you have no excuse then. Sorry..

HA HA HA HA HA

you are totally High right now. lol

Not something I do with minor children in my charge.

You have kids?

I'm a grandmother.

a reply to: Annee

Wow. I thought people were above ad hominem attacks. In other news is the op a bio of annee?

Or rather was the interview interesting other than him saying the same thing he has been saying. I'm sorry I was at work and couldn't watch it.

OKAY NOW.....back on topic.....

Julian Assange to appear on Fox with Megyn Kelly

Ad Hominem Attacks And You
Don't Respond to Obvious Trollery, Just Alert It
Go After the Ball, Not the Player!

He also claims wikileaks has information on the republican party campaign

As it is often said, talk is cheap. Most of this has always been just talk.

Of course he could be working to get pay offs to sit on info if he actually has some. Never forget that almost everything is about money.