Embrace multiculturalism/multirace VS push multiculturalism/multirace

The western world is going into a multicultural phase and this is much praised in the media we hear frequently words like.
*Diversity
*Richness of Culture
*Mixing pot
*Strength in diversity

It is seen as a Strength, something to be much praised and shouted about.

We embrace interracial relationships and the media talk about the intellectual benefits obtained from having parents of different heritage and the richness this bestow upon the children of these familys. We are told the children are more rounded,grounded.

again we are frequently told "It is the future"

The problem I have with this is that there is a difference between embracing something and pushing something, and from what I can see the media is actively pushing this not embracing this which is highly suspicious.

To push this as an agenda is actually the ultimate form of racism because it promotes the destruction of the individual races by blending them up into a race smoothie. The destruction of cultures/customs by mixing it all up.

I wonder though do you think the elites who push this reserve this future for themselves, why no of course as you well know they are obsessed with genealogy and blood lines, they teach the masses one thing but do the reverse themselves!

There really isn't diversity. It's just one idea and if you disagree then you are wrong

Plus a melting pot means really means one race and one culture. One is much easier to control then many

Multi-culturalism does not work and never has. As soon as a minority get above a certain percentage they stop trying to assimilate and start demanding political rights as a separate group. Just look around the world. Separate cultures simply aren't meant to share the same living space. Anytime you do, you're going to see a history of trouble and turmoil, sometimes leading to open warfare.


In South Africa it's the whites versus the blacks versus the Indians. And even amongst the blacks it's Zulu versus Xhosa, etc.

In Central Africa it's the Hutus versus the Tutsis.

In Palestine it's the Jews versus the Arabs.

In the Phillipines it's the Catholics versus the Moslems.

In Lebanon it's the Moslems versus the Christians versus the Druze versus the Maronites versus the Palestinians, etc.

In India it's Hindus versus Moslems versus Sikh versus Assamese.

In Iraq it's Sunnis versus Shia.

In Afghanistan it's Baluchis versus Hazara versus Khrghiz.

In the Balkans it's the Serbs versus the Croats versus the Bosnians versus the Herzogovinans, etc.

In the Caucauses it's the Armenians versus the Karabahks versus the Georgians versus the Azerbaijanies, etc. etc.

On Cyprus it's the Turks versus the Greeks.

It's the Kurds versus the Turks, the Arabs, and the Persians.

In Chechnya it's the Chechnyans versus the Russians.

In the Ukraine it's the Ukrainian speakers versus the Russian speakers.

In Sri Lanka it's the Sinhala versus the Tamils.

On Fiju it's the Tamil versus the native Fijians.

In Burma it's the Burmese versus the Karens and Rohingya.

In Tibet it's the Tibetans versus the Han Chinese.

In Uighurstan it's the Uighurs versus the Han Chinese.

In Malaysia and Indonesia it's the Malays versus the Chinese.

On Irian Jaya it's the Indonesians versus the native peoples.

In the Baltic countries its the Lats, Lits, and Ests versus the Russians.

In Ireland it's Catholic versus the Protestant.

In Spain it's the Basque versus the Spanish.

In Belgium it's the Flemish versus the Walloons.

In Canada it's the French-speaking versus the English-speaking.

In the US it's the blacks versus the whites.

In Latin America it's the criolles versus the nativos.

In Australia it's the whites versus the Aboriginies.

Heck, even the Czechs and Slovaks couldn't stand each other and decided to split up.


And those are just the examples I can think of off the top of my head.

So go ahead North America and Europe. Keep your borders open a few more years and then let's watch the fireworks begin!

zinc, you might be interested in reading up on Count Von Coudenove-Kalergi (considered to be the father of the EU). He wrote a book in the early 20th centry called Praktischer Idealismus which outlined a plan to flood Europe with migrants in order to create a mixed race which (according to him) would be easy to exploit and rule over.

He gained the attention of some very powerful men, including Max Warburg and Baron Louis de Rothschild.

Here's an exerpt from an article linked below:

"The Coudenhove-Kalergi European Prize is awarded every two years to Europeans who have excelled in promoting this criminal plan. Among those awarded with such a prize are Angela Merkel and Herman Van Rompuy."

Link:
golden-dawn-international-newsroom.blogspot.com...

That said, my half European/half Japanese children are beautiful, smart, amazing beings. I wouldn't change them for the world (SO blessed)! So I suppose there are two sides to every coin.

a reply to: zinc12

It is called "Balkanization" and it is a plan used to divide a country, destroy any semblance of unity, and drive globalism. You do not embrace insanity, you embrace assimilation.


A hundred years ago, President Teddy Roosevelt said, "The one absolutely certain way of bringing this nation to ruin, of preventing all possibility of its continuing as a nation at all, would be to permit it to become a tangle of squabbling nationalities."

President Roosevelt said, "In the first place, we should insist that if the immigrant who comes here in good faith becomes an American and assimilates himself to us, he shall be treated on an exact equality with everyone else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed, or birthplace, or origin.

But this is predicated upon the person's becoming in every facet an American, and nothing but an American...There can be no divided allegiance here. Any man who says he is an American, but something else also, isn't an American at all. We have room for but one flag, the American flag. We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language... and we have room for but one sole loyalty and that is a loyalty to the American people."

US "melting pot" was melting western europeans, mainly germanic peoples. How it evolved into all people's is something that a book could be written about. A major point would be to look at how immigration laws changed in 1965. Democrats lied to the public on purpose full well knowing the long term consequences. The democratic party would have died.

There is nothing wrong with allowing of people of differing cultural traditions to come into your country so long as they accept your own culture as the dominant one and the one they plan to adopt as their main or outward culture, the one they are going to raise their children to.

The problem is when everyone thinks that we can have pockets of Mexicans or Hondurans or Chinese or Indians or Syrians or Serbians or what all else have you living in this country as if they never left their homelands who have no plans of even attempting to live as Americans in America and don't plan to raise their children as Americans, either. That's colonization, not assimilation.

There is a lot every culture can keep in terms of life, language and tradition while still assimilating to be American.

a reply to: zinc12

Multiculturalism is a negative economic indicator.
When a country/countries is/are economically and culturally strong,
historically immigrants tend to pursue assimilation .

Currently, Multiculturalism is being used as a tool to divide,
reconfigure, and conquer established populations.
Order out of Chaos=make lots of dough/control by screwing things up.

S&F

a reply to: zosimov

Excellent and well informed reply.
If I might add.

a reply to: infolurker

Excellent Reply.
Ah yes, Theodorus Rex

a reply to: Wildmanimal

Well, thank you kindly! I thought the same about yours (and infolurker's) as well. Never did think about the correlation between economic and social stability and assimilation.. but makes perfect sense. Bravo!
And that quote from Roosevelt.. perfection.

a reply to: zinc12

Ohhhh... forget it,.

Can't be bothered.

originally posted by: thinline
There really isn't diversity. It's just one idea and if you disagree then you are wrong

If you disagree you are confused, backwards, racist and a xenophobe

[/post]Plus a melting pot means really means one race and one culture. One is much easier to control then many

Yes the one race is a smoothie race and the one culture is a smoothie culture..at least that is their aim so in fact as you said diversity is to be ironed out.

a reply to: starviego

The Roman empire and Mediterranean was a melting pot, Latin America is a melting pot, the world will eventually be a giant melting pot.

a reply to: starviego

Even in the small area I live you have little areas and in some cases mini ghetto's where you have people secluding themselves. There are Jewish areas, muslim areas, Indian areas, polish areas, Somalian ghetto areas etc On the borders where areas merge are areas of conflict. So no this picture that is painted of everyone harmoniously living together is an absolute lie yet the media keep on insisting the dream is working. Basically its like the media keep telling us the sky is green but when we look up we say nah its blue only for the media to turnaround and say your deluded.

originally posted by: zosimov
zinc, you might be interested in reading up on Count Von Coudenove-Kalergi (considered to be the father of the EU). He wrote a book in the early 20th centry called Praktischer Idealismus which outlined a plan to flood Europe with migrants in order to create a mixed race which (according to him) would be easy to exploit and rule over.
.

Thanks I will research into this but the thought that immediately comes to mind is that if they think it makes it easier to rule over said peoples then that would show that the truth is they see it as a weakness despite what the media keeps saying.
And again the elites such as the Rothschild are obsessed with genealogy and blood lines.

a reply to: ketsuko

Whilst in Rome do as the Romans is a phrase lost on many of these people who demand "change" essentially wanting to transform a country's laws and customs to their ideals regardless if this may result in conflict, they simply don't care.

a reply to: zinc12

Exactly. Promote one thing, do the opposite, seems to be the way these shadow people work.

Only.. have you looked at pictures of these people? The inbreeding is creating something scary-looking indeed. And I'm not referring to beauty, per se-- I think there is something beautiful to be found in many who are unconventionally attractive-- it's more like some permeating evil, off-set features, etc. (shudder)

originally posted by: TruthxIsxInxThexMist
a reply to: zinc12

Ohhhh... forget it,.

Can't be bothered.

Why you sound disappointed !

originally posted by: conspiracy nut
a reply to: starviego

The Roman empire and Mediterranean was a melting pot, Latin America is a melting pot, the world will eventually be a giant melting pot.

Huge numbers of Latin Americans are seeking to emigrate elsewhere and an equally huge number already have so hardly a advertisement for success!