It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The Obama administration is withholding from Congress details about how $1.3 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds was delivered to Iran, according to conversations with lawmakers, who told the Washington Free Beacon that the administration is now stonewalling an official inquiry into the matter.
The Departments of State, Treasury, and Justice have all rebuffed a congressional probe into the circumstances surrounding the $1.3 billion payment to Iran, which is part of an additional $400 million cash payout that occurred just prior to the release of several U.S. hostages and led to accusations that the administration had paid Iran a ransom.
The Obama administration has admitted in recent days that the $400 million cash delivery to Iran was part of an effort to secure the release of these American hostages, raising further questions on Capitol Hill about White House efforts to suppress these details from the public.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: reldra
Yep. Nothing to see here folks. Move along.
Why is the Obama circus blocking an investigation, if there's nothing to it? A bit suspicious that they delivered money juuust when Iran released our people. Why are they releasing money NOW, that they held for so long? Why the travel warning? Maybe because they know Iran is going to hold Americans for ransom and they don't want us to know they cave to it? The Obama administration has been a failure from day 1.
Move along folks....move along.
originally posted by: reldra
a reply to: xuenchen
There was a decision some time ago to pay monry frozen since 1979. We paid it. It's over.
Or...we could form comittees, have investigations for 3 years. When Republicans aren;t satisfied, we can have more investigations.
I will add that, for some comuter systems, that is the highest amount that can be made for a single payment. Older mainframes, for example.
If there is a computer expert here that is familiar with this, please chime in.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: reldra
We all seem to "know" that.
So why all the secrecy and defensive posture by Obama?
Why not just issue a written page explaining the whole thing?
He must be nervous about something.
originally posted by: xuenchen
I bet there's something involved with this ....
Supreme Court lets terror victims collect Iran's frozen money
Liberal Democrats and conservative Republicans in Congress, as well as the Obama administration, supported the families in the case.
originally posted by: roadgravel
I can see making sure they let the people go before they get their money, even it it was their money to begin with, to make sure they uphold their part of the deals. If the US can get some people back as we return the frozen money, it seem to be a good move to me.
She carried three suitcases of paperwork documenting her claim that the government owed her more than $100,000. Many people thought she was mentally ill and was making it up. But she was right all along, and Social Security wrote her a check for $99,999. They will probably give her more.
originally posted by: roadgravel
I can see making sure they let the people go before they get their money, even it it was their money to begin with, to make sure they uphold their part of the deals. If the US can get some people back as we return the frozen money, it seem to be a good move to me.