Hillary Clinton: "Vast right-wing conspiracy"

Vast right-wing conspiracy

""Vast right-wing conspiracy" is a conspiracy theory referenced by then First Lady of the United States Hillary Clinton in 1998 in defense of her husband, President Bill Clinton, characterizing the continued allegations of scandal against her and her husband, including the Lewinsky scandal, as part of a long campaign by Clinton's political enemies.[1] The term has been used since, including in a question posed to Bill Clinton in 2009 to describe verbal attacks on Barack Obama during his early presidency.[2] Hillary Clinton mentioned it again during her 2016 presidential campaign......"

See whole article here:
en.wikipedia.org...

The fact that President Bill Clinton was only the second President of the United States to be impeached and tried for "High crimes and misdemeanors"
before congress we might suppose is part of the conspiracy? - After all he did win the final vote and was allowed to stay in office.


But what Mrs. Clinton fails to mention is the vast left wing conspiracy of rich and powerful Socialists who have no respect for the people
or Constitution of the United States of America.


Often refered to as "The New World Order" this group of Socialists consider the United States as theirs and any Constitutional right that stands
in their way as an obstacle to be eliminated - And Hillary Clinton is their anointed candidate.


This vast left wing conspiracy is far more dangerous and sinister than any right wing conspiracy - If successful it will put an end
to the US Constitution and the United States as it was conceived and still exists


The fact that Hillary Clinton is following in her husband's footsteps by lying before Congress and the American People
and shows disregard for the government of the US and the people because the "vast left wing conspiracy' protects her,
shows just how dangerous this conspiracy is





"You can fool all the people some of the time, and some of the people all the time, but you cannot fool all the people all the time."

-Abraham Lincoln

a reply to: AlienView

There is no difference between the left wing and the right wing.

At the top of the pyramid they are all beholden to the same Eugencist bankster families that have built up the multinational control grid across the globe.

Their hubris will be their downfall, as we are currently witnessing, they truly do not conrol everything they simply have created that illusion.

a reply to: elementalgrove

I agree. The two sides is a method by which the actual elite induces a constant ideological war which divides the people on trivial issues and distracts the people from actual, elite-threatening topics.

a reply to: elementalgrove

Like many have said before me... They both want the same, they just have different ways of getting there

a reply to: elementalgrove

They have been saying that for years - some of the radio talk shows used to call the two parties the 'Republicrats"

But in the last 10 years or so things have changed - A fundamental difference in policies and agendas has cume up between
the political left and right.

Oddly enough, on many issues I lean to the left BUT you will have to ask Bill Clinton to explain why I registered as a
Republican ?

And ask yourself who is more dangerous to you rights - Banksters and businessman trying to get richer OR political cartels
such as the ones the Clintonistas and their billionaire backers represent


Hillary just released her tax returns - She only grossed 10 million

Rich Socialists preaching equality seems like the height of hypocrisy.


And then you have the billionaire Trump who the insiders and the so called 'New World Order', including members of his
own political party don't trust or like - That makes him worth gambling on - and yes it is a gamble.

a reply to: AlienView

Thats one reason why the two party system, when things go bad, blame the other side for it.

Que endless debate. Then, what was the crime again?

Or use distraction as cover for something else. Monica Lewinsky was perfectly timed to distract everyone from all those cruise missiles pounding Sudan and Afghanistan...

Operation Infinite Reach was the codename for American cruise missile strikes on al-Qaeda bases in Afghanistan and a pharmaceutical factory in Sudan on August 20, 1998

Operation Infinite Reach

Clinton testified on August 17 1998, the airstrikes occur three days later on Aug. 20.

August 17, 1998: President Bill Clinton becomes the first sitting president to testify before a grand jury investigating his conduct. After the questioning at the White House is finished, Clinton goes on national TV to admit he had an inappropriate relationship with Monica Lewinsky.

Chronology

a reply to: AlienView

But in the last 10 years or so things have changed - A fundamental difference in policies and agendas has cume up between
the political left and right.

That's all just POTUS-level bickering at most.

But you've got to remember that POTUS is NOT the Top Level. Actually there are no less than 21 levels of security clearance ABOVE that of the potus!



And that's what so many people don't even realise!

a reply to: AlienView

And ask yourself who is more dangerous to you rights - Banksters and businessman trying to get richer OR political cartels

Forgive me here but I am a little bit shocked that you do not realize that the Banksters and Businessman own the politicians. It has been this way for at least a century since the Federal Reserve Act was passed.

And then you have the billionaire Trump who the insiders and the so called 'New World Order', including members of his
own political party don't trust or like - That makes him worth gambling on - and yes it is a gamble.

Good god sir!

You realize believe such nonsense?

How about you ask yourself why Hillary sat front row at Trumps wedding.

How about we ask Trump how he really feels about the Clinton Family?




Are you familiar with the movie Wag the Dog?

Trump is a psy-op to divide us and guarantee his good friend Hillary becomes the next POTUS.

originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: AlienView

But in the last 10 years or so things have changed - A fundamental difference in policies and agendas has cume up between
the political left and right.

That's all just POTUS-level bickering at most.

But you've got to remember that POTUS is NOT the Top Level. Actually there are no less than 21 levels of security clearance ABOVE that of the potus!

And that's what so many people don't even realise!

Crypto is just a piece of material to encrypt communications channels to prevent unauthorized access. I actually worked with it extensively on submarines. I have held a Top Secret/SCI clearance for many years, had access to many different compartments. I was also cleared for Cosmic Top Secret, which is just the Nato form of Top Secret. I'd say that chart is bunk.

It honestly looks like a chart that someone put together with different SCI code words they had heard of and just listed them at the top. I'm not saying there isn't classifications above what I've been privy to, but this chart just screams fake.

a reply to: elementalgrove

elementalgrove wrote:

Forgive me here but I am a little bit shocked that you do not realize that the Banksters and Businessman own the politicians. It has been this way for at least a century since the Federal Reserve Act was passed.

Usually - But it does 'appear' that they don't own Trump - That is why they seem to be going all out to stop him
- to them he is a loose canon - meaning someone they can't buy-off or manipulate.

Are you familiar with the movie Wag the Dog? Trump is a psy-op to divide us and guarantee his good friend Hillary becomes the next POTUS.

That is not impossible -- but improbable - I just can't see Donald Trump as being Hillary's lap-dog.

Donald Trump is running for President for the sake of Donald Trump - that you can trust in - What else is left for him
to achieve ?

Not being part of either the left or right wing conspiracies of our day is what has made, and continues to make
Donald Trump popular.....

He is the closest thing to an independent candidate this county has had since Ross Perot.
But Ross Perot quit and then was no longer trusted when he changed his mind.

And Donald Turmp is yet to quit - And if you have been watching it all unfold - 'they' have tried to make him quit.
I guess even a billionaire can sometimes be an underdog - Can the underdog win against the 'vast left wing conspiracy' of
rich socalists who want to stop him

Place your bets

a reply to: AlienView

It's always funny how people make the argument that Socialists (a political ideology geared towards making sure the entire public has all the basic necessities of life) are trying to take all our stuff while defending capitalism which exists to funnel wealth to the top. It's like people don't understand the words they are using.

Granted. Both ideologies in their pure forms have EXTREME flaws, but if you can make a good mix of both of them it's actually a good system. This is what we have in the US. I'm not sure why people are so scared of it though.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

There is some truth to what you say - But the word 'Socialist' has become a concept of different meanings.

Bernie Sanders may be a genuine Socialist believing in economic and political equality.

The Socialism of the Clinton's on the other hand is different - It is conspiratorial in nature - a form of power grabbing
hypocrisy leading to a kind of elitism of the powerful - It is more dangerous than the elitism of laissez-faire capitalism.

A book written many years ago called 'The Money Game' referred to our economic system as "Socialism of the Rich"

That is the problem

a reply to: elementalgrove

The very public divide in the Replubican party right now gives you some idea of where the fault lines lie. The Sanders/Clinton fight may have done the same in the Democrats, but they have a stronger grip on their party if not their base.

The Republicans who hate Trump are very definitely the Globalist camp.

originally posted by: AlienView
a reply to: Krazysh0t

There is some truth to what you say - But the word 'Socialist' has become a concept of different meanings.

Bernie Sanders may be a genuine Socialist believing in economic and political equality.

The Socialism of the Clinton's on the other hand is different - It is conspiratorial in nature - a form of power grabbing
hypocrisy leading to a kind of elitism of the powerful - It is more dangerous than the elitism of laissez-faire capitalism.

A book written many years ago called 'The Money Game' referred to our economic system as "Socialism of the Rich"

That is the problem

Call Clinton style socialism Globalist Socialism mixed with a lot of cronyism, but that's always where socialism goes, isn't it?

The Clinton camp works to actively subvert the national sovereignty of the US to international, globalist entities whether they be big corporate or UN/international law based. They'd be very happy to see us subverted to an entity like the one that sits in Brussels where no one is elected by the people but they have vast power over everyone's daily lives anyhow.

In the end, that's the end game - no election accountability and complete central control. And sadly enough, no matter what brand of socialism Bernie was peddling, that's always the end game with socialism because it is the only possible way to attempt to enforce equity of outcome.

a reply to: AlienView

The Socialism that Hillary represents is pretty much the Socialism that has been within our country for the last 100 years or so. It helped us get to the height of the world powers in the mid 1900's, it helped create the middle class with its guaranteed safety nets, and it has helped to massive raise the standard of living in our country. Just because rich people can also benefit from it doesn't mean it is flawed. That's what helps make it a great policy actually. The rich and the poor can get ahead.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: elementalgrove

The very public divide in the Replubican party right now gives you some idea of where the fault lines lie. The Sanders/Clinton fight may have done the same in the Democrats, but they have a stronger grip on their party if not their base.

The Republicans who hate Trump are very definitely the Globalist camp.

As I watched the media launch their "anti-everything" Trump tirade in the beginning of him deciding to run, I immediately thought of Operation Mockingbird.

The Republicans who "hate" Trump are most certainly in the globalist camp, but simply because Trump has talking points that make him "anti-establishment" simply means he has the same writers that have convinced the liberals that Obama is a peaceful liberal.

Trump's history with the Clinton family says it all for me.

He is literally hitting every possible point along the lines of divide and conquer between liberals and conservatives and it has effectively guaranteed Hillary's presidency.

The only wild card here is the hackers that are eviscerating the secrecy the elite have hidden behind for so long.

a reply to: AlienView

It's a fait acompli. The push towards globalism is a done deal, eventually.

The big question will be whether we take it, or fight against it.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: AlienView

The Socialism that Hillary represents is pretty much the Socialism that has been within our country for the last 100 years or so. It helped us get to the height of the world powers in the mid 1900's, it helped create the middle class with its guaranteed safety nets, and it has helped to massive raise the standard of living in our country. Just because rich people can also benefit from it doesn't mean it is flawed. That's what helps make it a great policy actually. The rich and the poor can get ahead.

The creation of the middle class and its guaranteed safety nets, alongside the high standard of living in this country... are leading us directly into the inevitable collapse of our nation.
A glut of old people living off of a system that can't operate without constant taxpayer population growth- and now we've shipped off all the work overseas so there's a glut of working age people not only not paying taxes, but living off that same system.

When the teets dry up and the whole thing comes crashing down, there's going to be a whole lot of angry, dumb, hungry, and potentially well armed people around.

a reply to: AlienView

The fact that President Bill Clinton was only the second President of the United States to be impeached and tried for "High crimes and misdemeanors"

I'm not a fan of the Clintons, but our political system (and the voting public) is extremely partisan when it comes to attacking representatives from the opposite party. We see it played out here everyday on ATS! There are many presidents who have gotten away with much worst crimes than Bill Clinton's extramarital affair. (George W. Bush is a prime example). The amount of taxpayer's money spent on an investigation into a presidential affair alone was criminal! How many work place related affairs have been going on across this country? It certainly doesn't affect anyone's ability to carry out their job duties.

Sure both parties attack each other. I have to say though, every time a democratic president takes office, many conservatives start yelling for impeachment. Obama was attacked the first day he took office and has been blamed at times for the most ridiculous things.

All this finger pointing and bickering at liberals and conservatives only hurts this country. It divides us as a nation and creates gridlock. Nothing positive can come out of all this bickering. The hate that both parties have for each other drowns out the voice of the people. Instead of coming together and putting differences aside, we have a congress that does nothing but complain, block legislation and threaten to shut down government. It sounds more like children fighting than mature adults doing their job and conducting our nations business.

I really think Sanders had it right when he said this country needed a political revolution. I think Americans should voice dissatisfaction with the two-party system. None of us like the party establishment, which is why Donald Trump has received so much support. The problem with Trump is he's not competent and has a lot of issues to numerous to mention.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

When the GOP's far right extremists were given more, not less, political power, along with increasing and continuous financial support from wealthy backers (such as the Koch and Scaife families), the brainwashing of new generations of Americans began.

How I Survived My Father's Hateful Right-Wing Extremism

His distorted view of the world, much less America, is based upon his closed-minded fundamental belief that “they” are out to get us. “They” is everything and anything that has to do with destroying America: blacks, Jews, gays, communists, socialists, Marxists, humanists, liberals, democrats, environmentalists, educators, equal rights proponents, foreigners, people of color, rich people, happy people or anyone else who contradicted him. His anger made him a natural fit with the racist, right-wing conspiracy-minded militant nut jobs who believed Joseph McCarthy to be an honorable American while John F. Kennedy and Martin Luther King Jr. were commies set out to destroy America.

Here is a 1998 article about the racist Council of Conservative Citizens ideology impacting the Clinton enemies. Another part of the "vast right wing conspiracy".