It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.
But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.
Two wrongs?
I find it incredibly hypocritical.
originally posted by: IAMTAT
WOW...the hacks just keep coming...
According to this Reuters article released tonight...It certainly appears The Clinton Foundation may very well have already been Hacked.
While nothing has yet surfaced from this potential hack...It may be coming soon...and it may possibly be embarrassing and incriminating.
This story just broke...so there is only this one reporting source available, but it's a strong source...and one can absolutely expect this story to be all over the Internet and the MSM by tomorrow and for many days to come.
Drudge already has this as their banner headline...so buckle-up!
Clinton Foundation hired cyber firm after suspected hacking: sources
Bill and Hillary Clinton's charitable foundation hired the security firm FireEye to examine its data systems after seeing indications they might have been hacked, according to two sources familiar with the matter.
So far, no message or document hacked from the New York-based Clinton Foundation has surfaced in public, the sources said.
One of the sources and two U.S. security officials said that like hackers who targeted the Democratic National Committee, Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign and the Democrats' congressional fundraising committee, the hackers appear to have used “spear phishing” techniques to gain access to the foundation's network.
These techniques include creating bogus emails or websites in an effort to gain access to Clinton Foundation staffers’ emails and then to the foundation itself.
Although no documents have emerged, the attacks have left some Democrats and Clinton campaign officials worried that the hackers might have obtained emails and voice messages that could be used to reinforce Republican charges that donors to the Clinton Foundation were rewarded with access to Clinton and her aides while she was secretary of state or to her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
Another concern: hackers or outlets such as the anti-secrecy WikiLeaks website could release documents and emails damaging to her presidential campaign, several people familiar with the foundation's activities said.
FULL Article:
www.reuters.com...
Fireeye Cyber Security:
www.fireeye.com...
originally posted by: Naturallywired
This crone from outer skin to inner bone will most likely be elected by the evil elite cronies that are spineless future morelocks.
originally posted by: Tardacus
so, basically ever computer system associated with hillary has been hacked, except her super secret,super secure bathroom server where she kept the classified E-Mails.
only a complete moron would still believe that her home server wasn`t hacked.
the woman has compromised national security, she has no business running for president.
How has this crony witch even has supporters is beyond thought?
originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.
But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.
Two wrongs?
I find it incredibly hypocritical.
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: IAMTAT
*please be real
*please be real
*please be real
I hope it's not a controlled leak and this is legit, with some good info
originally posted by: Teikiatsu
originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.
But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.
Two wrongs?
I find it incredibly hypocritical.
Why? 'Hypcritical' would mean that the two scenarios are close enough to be comparable.
On one hand you have a private entity that wants to stay private and mind its own business.
On the other hand you have a public entity who wants to remain public and *claims* that it values privacy but represents an administration that broke into private citizen's phone/email/texting data.
Looks to me like 'comeuppance' more than hypocrisy.
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: SudoNim
just to see how she would try to get out of it and how her supporters and the MSM would spin it.
Called it on page 1. Nothing has come out yet and here you are, scrambling to do damage control.
originally posted by: jadedANDcynical
Wow, I wonder what was pilfered?
I bet they're crapping gold bricks right about now hoping it was some government agency that hacked her because them they can bribe/intimidate.
If it was rogue operators, freelancers, she's potentially fragged.
Though it will be fun to see what kind of spin the media puts on anything that surfaces...
(think I need more popcorn)
originally posted by: Tardacus
so, basically ever computer system associated with hillary has been hacked, except her super secret,super secure bathroom server where she kept the classified E-Mails.
only a complete moron would still believe that her home server wasn`t hacked.
the woman has compromised national security, she has no business running for president.
originally posted by: UnBreakable
Poor Hill doesn't seem to have any luck when it comes to email.