Motherlode: Clinton Foundation Hacked?

It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.

a reply to: Annee

Their use of our tax dollars to conduct business negates that entirely. Or would you rather they have the monopolies on force and privacy?

Go back to bashing Trump. It's far more fruitful than defending Hillary.

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.

Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?

Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to privacies that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.

Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?

No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.

a reply to: Annee

Yes Annee and yet they exist, even now.

Heaven forbid they are used in favor of the public?

a reply to: IAMTAT

Snowdens 'It's time' Twitter comment a few weeks ago is now starting to bear fruit it seems.

All good things will come to those who wait, maybe they gave the CF the opportunity to come forward first before they unleash the contents of the hack for the public to dissect and consume prior to November 8th.

'If you have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear' - LOL.

originally posted by: Elostone
Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to pro acids that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee

The extent of the invasion is way beyond what I find acceptable.

I expect every excuse under the sun.

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: Annee

Yes Annee and yet they exist, even now.

Heaven forbid they are used in favor of the public?

Ever been in a group where the leadership quits/leaves - - - and the whole thing completely falls apart?

I know its Shocking - - - but, leadership is a requirement.

a reply to: Annee

I dont care Clinton's Facebook or personal texts or internet use.
I care about her dodgy foundation taking bribes and donations from foreign governments that influence her decisions in her official capacity for the US government.

that should be public.. 100% transparent.. and it should be well before she cleans/deletes/removes anything.

a reply to: Annee

I'm counting on it to happen exactly that way!

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Elostone
Politicians are public servants. Private citizens are entitled to pro acids that public officials forego.
Goes with the territory when one chooses a career in politics.
a reply to: Annee

The extent of the invasion is way beyond what I find acceptable.

Then don't run for political office.

a reply to: ghostrager


Well, it's about time we see a RECENT ASSANGE interview and disclosure. The media and ATS kept regurgitating his June 17th interview as if it was fresh. The BUZZFEED interview you linked to really is fresh, GhostRager. And encouraging! Thank-you.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.

Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?

No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.

Well you should be scared. It's time.

Wasn't Bryan Pagliano working for the Clinton foundation and running Hillary's private server through the Clinton Foundation for a few months just after Hillary became SOS?

a reply to: Annee

Government serves us.

They are public servants.

They are not our masters.

If they are doing unethical things, then I want to know.

Could be possible that Hillary is really ill and just doesn't care. But, fore the rest of them.....

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: Throes

originally posted by: Annee
It really amazes me how MANY on ATS rant about personal privacy, electronic invasion, cameras in public areas, etc.

But, when it targets someone in a political position - - - they salivate at the disclosure.

Two wrongs?

I find it incredibly hypocritical.

Scared your corrupt candidates might have more bad news coming?

No, not at all.

I just find it extremely hypocritical.

Well you should be scared. It's time.

Why waste energy on speculation?

a reply to: Elostone

or if people start killing them instead of innocent civilians just to get on the news.

Things are going to get real. There is only one logical outcome to all this.

I will not be shocked. I will be dissapointed that with all the smart people in our country and everyone is caught up in denial over the actual hold of the illusion of power and control.

There are no ivory towers. Thats just a saying. There are no forts, only the armed forces have those.

There will be blood. History would teach us better, but we keep rewriting it in the hopes that somehow that will change the future....while never correcting our errors.

It wont be a revolt, an uprising, a backlash, or a state of upheaval. It will be a culture of revenge.

No end for that beyond what is percieved as righteous annihilation.

Sad is not the word.

a reply to: Annee

Speculation? This is observation.

Speculation happens when conclusions are drawn from an initial event.

Here we have an historic and blatant disregard for the sensitive details of the workings of this country, in the hands of a mentally ill woman.

Her failure is quite indicative of what her leadership would entail.

Denial of this trend, current news aside, is either blind fanaticism or compensated denial on your part.

Same goes for the rest of her defense team here.