FBI papers reveal that Hillary Clinton did not mislead Congress, but was 'extremely careless'

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
This guy was an NWO believer and someone who would constantly say that we are due for an attack "any day now". This really falls under, "even a broken clock is right twice a day."

Ok, so since he was an NWO believer, therefore he should have been dismissed. He made the claim in June and it happened three months later. Unfortunately when that clock was right, it cost 3,000 lives. So if you say something won't happen, and it doesn't, you will claim you are correct. But if someone else says something will happen, and it does, you will pull out the "even a broken clock is right twice a day" excuse. Got it.

a reply to: UnBreakable

No. I'm saying we are talking about a guy who makes claims similar to this every so often. Again, "A broken clock is right twice a day." If you spend your whole career crying wolf, when a terrorist attack occurs you'll eventually be right. It's not like they'll never happen again or anything.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" -Comey

"No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation — including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation because we did our investigation the right way." -Comey

Source

Then at the end of all of that, Comey tells us that other people WOULD be prosecuted. You desperately want to ignore that fact.

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" -Comey

"No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation — including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation because we did our investigation the right way." -Comey

Source

Then at the end of all of that, Comey tells us that other people WOULD be prosecuted. You desperately want to ignore that fact.

Where is that quote?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

No. I'm saying we are talking about a guy who makes claims similar to this every so often. Again, "A broken clock is right twice a day." If you spend your whole career crying wolf, when a terrorist attack occurs you'll eventually be right. It's not like they'll never happen again or anything.

Again, he didn't spend his "whole career" making the 9-11 prediction. He made the claim in June, specifically blaming Bin Laden, and it occurred in September. Unless his career only spanned three months or Bin Laden existed throughout all the years of his whole career.

On a broadcast on June, 28th of 2001 Bill Cooper would make the prediction that 9/11 would happen and Osama Bin Laden would be blamed.

Extremely Careless.... Short-circuited....

Talk about a couple qualities I look for in EVERY Presidential candidate!

a reply to: UnBreakable

He's a conspiracy theorist. After spending time on here I don't for EVEN A SECOND believe that he wasn't talking about false flags and all sorts of other CT buzzwords constantly. Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

I'm not saying he spent his whole career making the 9/11 prediction. I'm saying it was just one of many different predictions he made as a conspiracy theorist, because that's what CTers do. They make up predictions based on their warped worldview of how reality works.

originally posted by: iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: FamCore

I see... Can't do a "what about Hillary?" response, so it's a "what about Krazysh0t?" response.

Serious answer: Get back on topic.

It is on topic. Your supporting the biggest, evilest criminal in our Government, who clearly lied and misled, and people are wondering what your motive is.

Just because youn think Clinton is some sort of Super Villain, diesn't mean that thast is of use to the topic.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" -Comey

"No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation — including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation because we did our investigation the right way." -Comey

Source

Then at the end of all of that, Comey tells us that other people WOULD be prosecuted. You desperately want to ignore that fact.

Where is that quote?

....after clearing Hillary that this is not to say everyone in the government can do this or that they would not prosecute someone else for the same thing. Comey said

www.armstrongeconomics.com... no-indictment/

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

Luck or not, he got it right. Unfortunately for the victims.

a reply to: UnBreakable

That isn't saying what theBulk implied it was saying. For one it isn't even a direct quote. It's a summary of what he said, but the meaning is clear. He is saying that just because they aren't going to charge Hillary with anything doesn't mean that someone else should do what she did.

Context matters.

Plus, proving intent is where you guys are hung up. I know you want to believe that Hillary is at fault, but if you can't prove intent and Comey said you can't then there is nothing left to go on except beat a dead horse.

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

Luck or not, he got it right. Unfortunately for the victims.

No he didn't. He said the NWO was at fault and that Bin Laden would be a scapegoat.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TheBulk

"Although there is evidence of potential violations regarding the handling of classified information, our judgment is that no reasonable prosecutor would bring such a case" -Comey

"No outside influence of any kind was brought to bear. I know there were many opinions expressed by people who were not part of the investigation — including people in government — but none of that mattered to us. Opinions are irrelevant, and they were all uninformed by insight into our investigation because we did our investigation the right way." -Comey

Source

Then at the end of all of that, Comey tells us that other people WOULD be prosecuted. You desperately want to ignore that fact.

Where is that quote?

Now you're just playing dumb. I quoted it at the start of this back and forth.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

He's a conspiracy theorist. After spending time on here I don't for EVEN A SECOND believe that he wasn't talking about false flags and all sorts of other CT buzzwords constantly. Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

I'm not saying he spent his whole career making the 9/11 prediction. I'm saying it was just one of many different predictions he made as a conspiracy theorist, because that's what CTers do. They make up predictions based on their warped worldview of how reality works.

So at the time, Bin Laden was a common "CT buzzword". Ok.

a reply to: TheBulk

security or administrative sanctions

Isn't jail time.

a reply to: Krazysh0t

I'm talking about the fact that regardless of what the FBI said, everyone knows that the lied and intentionally mislead everyone and that she still is. Everyone with a brain knows it.
The ones without one, will see this and think that she did no wrong.
The better question is, why are the FBI investigators sugar coating their report?

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

He's a conspiracy theorist. After spending time on here I don't for EVEN A SECOND believe that he wasn't talking about false flags and all sorts of other CT buzzwords constantly. Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

I'm not saying he spent his whole career making the 9/11 prediction. I'm saying it was just one of many different predictions he made as a conspiracy theorist, because that's what CTers do. They make up predictions based on their warped worldview of how reality works.

So at the time, Bin Laden was a common "CT buzzword". Ok.

Bin Laden had just made an announcement that he'd attack the US in two weeks time.

Cooper's followers claim that he predicted the 911 attacks on his June 28, 2001 radio show.[6] Transcripts of the show indicate that Cooper made reference to a CNN news item widely released a few days earlier on June 24th reporting that Osama Bin Laden had vowed to attack U.S. and Israeli interests in the next two weeks.[7] Cooper added his own spin to this report, saying that an attack would come (no date specified), it would be orchestrated by (you guessed it) the New World Order, and "Bin Laden would be blamed for it."

(Source)

originally posted by: o0oTOPCATo0o
a reply to: Krazysh0t

I'm talking about the fact that regardless of what the FBI said, everyone knows that the lied and intentionally mislead everyone and that she still is. Everyone with a brain knows it.
The ones without one, will see this and think that she did no wrong.
The better question is, why are the FBI investigators sugar coating their report?

Nope. There is no proof of intent.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
For one it isn't even a direct quote. It's a summary of what he said

Yes, it was.

youtu.be...

originally posted by: Krazysh0t

originally posted by: UnBreakable

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: UnBreakable

Like I said, he got lucky with his claim.

Luck or not, he got it right. Unfortunately for the victims.

No he didn't. He said the NWO was at fault and that Bin Laden would be a scapegoat.

You say he didn't, I say he did. Like the saying goes 'opinions are like #$&holes, everyone has one".