It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Nikola014
a reply to: dukeofjive696969
"I don't support Hillary..." Sure you don't
Why do you guys have a need to post daily poll results telling us Trump is behind? What's the point? You are not going to make anyone vote for your cult leader, but you will just make some people actually vote for him, because of the enormous propaganda going on against him.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: DelMarvel
Not all the polls during the primaries had Trump winning the nomination.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: MrSpad
Nobody has ever won the presidency based solely on the voters' levels of hatred against their opponent. Look at how that worked out for John Kerry in 2004 and McCain in 08 and Romney in 12.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: Bone75
Over 200 million eligible voting Americans and polls usually consist of around 500-2000 people. You have a higher chance of being struck by lightning than you do being polled by the MSM. Also, do you still have a landline? I sure don't.
originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: MrSpad
Trump, if I remember correctly, was dead last with the youth vote during the primaries so it's no wonder he continues to lose by YUGE margins!
He's winning at losing!
originally posted by: LSU0408
a reply to: MrSpad
Yet he still pulls in crowds by the thousands while Hillary draws +/- 150.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: DelMarvel
LMAO! The accuracy went up with the fewer polls conducted. That's so counter productive to traditional polling science it's ridiculous.
Also, Fivethrtyeight's Nate Silver spent MONTHS hammering at how slim Trump's chances of winning the nomination were. How in the blue hell can his sit's polls be heralded as accurate while the analysis of those polls by their site founder and supposed expert analyst be so wrong?
Again, it's BS. The media has a narrative to pedal and defend and they will stop at nothing to keep their chokehold on that narrative, including propagandizing their polls. It isn't a right wing or left wing conspiracy, it's a globalist one... and the American media is nothing if not globalist.
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: DelMarvel
Also, Fivethrtyeight's Nate Silver spent MONTHS hammering at how slim Trump's chances of winning the nomination were. How in the blue hell can his sit's polls be heralded as accurate while the analysis of those polls by their site founder and supposed expert analyst be so wrong?
originally posted by: burdman30ott6
a reply to: MrSpad
Wait, reread that to yourself...
There a step or two missing in the logic you're using. " You have ad to your base with Trump has not done. And Clinton has" Hillary's revivals are drawing an average of 1/5th the number of supporters as Trump.
This doesn't even factor in the numerous reports of local fire marshals restricting crowd size at Trump's rallies, leaving more thousands outside the venues.
The Koch Brothers have announced a favoribility to Clinton. Ooooh!!! Ooooh!!! Aren't these the two who the Dems spent the last 8 years portraying as walking embodiments of Satan? How is their supporting Clinton going to be received by the sheep that bought into how evil they were the past decade?
A homophobic Islamic terrorists homophobic Islamic terrorist supporter's father. WOW! She's capturing that much sought after Jihadist and Stockholm Syndrome voter demographic here, that's for sure.
Hillary's "base" isn't something anyone with half a brain would build a structure on. I'd rather have a small stone base that can support vertical construction than a large sand base that will erode before the first floor is even completed anyday.