Mandela Effect - Kidney Proof - Internal Organs Changed Position

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: raymundoko

Btw, how's your fantasy grammar rule? Found it yet or did it completely dissapear from this reality?

It's probably hiding in another timeline, along with your imaginary posting protocols.

a reply to: TerryDon79

Obviously, since it was unrelated drivel that didn't apply.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: TerryDon79

Obviously, since it was unrelated drivel that didn't apply.

Of course it did. I already explained how it applies. Just because you don't think it applied, doesn't make your opinion any more relevant.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: TerryDon79

Again, your comment does not relate to the exchange you responded to, at all. Hop along.

LOL. Your chief argument in all these threads seems to amount to subtle variations of "Don't talk to me. I wasn't talking to you. You took that out of context. Go away."

You might want to try some new tricks. Internet conversations will not ever adhere to your strict, imaginary rules.

a reply to: Greggers

There is nothing imaginary about the value of posting accurate replies that are not out of context. I don't see how you can deny such a thing.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

There is nothing imaginary about the value of posting accurate replies that are not out of context. I don't see how you can deny such a thing.

Since no one did that, I guess you should stop taking things out of context.

originally posted by: Greggers

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: raymundoko

Btw, how's your fantasy grammar rule? Found it yet or did it completely dissapear from this reality?

It's probably hiding in another timeline, along with your imaginary posting protocols.

I had to give you a star for the LOL.

a reply to: Greggers

No, these threads are flooded by replies that are out of context. This is not my fault.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

No, these threads are flooded by repliess that are out of context. This is not my fault.

It is your fault, since by and large, your replies are the ones most off topic.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

No, these threads are flooded by repliess that are out of context. This is not my fault.

In your opinion.

But hey, not everyone shares your opinion. Hence discussion forums with lots of different opinions are formed, including this one.

a reply to: Greggers

Still waiting for you to back up your claim.

Random confusing info on earth's location in the milky way.

From galaxymap.org...

"The other arms have been treated a bit like those roads in European cities that change their names every few blocks. The other major arm in Hurt's illustration runs through the southern constellations Scutum, Crux and Centaurus (among others) as viewed from Earth so in the scientific literature it can be called the Scutum-Crux arm, the Scutum-Centaurus arm, the Crux-Centaurus arm, the Crux-Scutum arm, the Scutum arm, the Crux arm, the Centaurus arm, and even the Scutum-Crux-Centaurus arm"

" The Orion spur appears to branch off from the Sagittarius arm at or near the intense radio source W51, which is a large complex of star formation regions and supernova remnants."


From:
en.m.wikipedia.org...
"The Orion Arm is located between the Carina–Sagittarius Arm (toward the Galactic Center) and the Perseus Arm (toward the outside Universe), the latter one of the two major arms of the Milky Way. Long thought to be a minor structure, a "spur" between the two longer adjacent arms Perseus and Carina-Sagittarius, evidence was presented in mid 2013 that it might be a branch of the Perseus Arm, or possibly an independent arm segment itself.,"

a reply to: TerryDon79

In your opinion.

It is fact. I just showed you why your response didn't apply. Mechanisms don't have feelings or knowledge.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

Still waiting for you to back up your claim.

I'm still waiting for any evidence of timeline shifts, besides "feeling" and "knowing".

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

Still waiting for you to back up your claim.

The fact that your replies are generally off topic is self-evident.

a reply to: TerryDon79

I didn't present this as verifiable fact.

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: TerryDon79

Mechanisms don't have knowledge.

Apparently neither do you?

a reply to: Greggers

So care to back up your statement?

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: TerryDon79

In your opinion.

It is fact. I just showed you why your response didn't apply. Mechanisms don't have feelings or knowledge.

I never said they did.

Maybe you should read my reply (to the other member) before you jump to conclusions and make things up that I never typed?

originally posted by: TheMaxHeadroomIncident
a reply to: Greggers

So care to back up your statement?

I refer you to your many posts in this thread.