It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: markosity1973
true..a war with no battle lines, no clear enemy..a war of terror.
what could be worse really?
originally posted by: JacKatMtn
Doesn't this make two "shots fired" incidents in the past couple of days, where, after the chaos, news media coverage, where, after hours of investigation, the LEO's on the scene found NO evidence of shots fired, no shells, no victims...
Talking about JFK airport and the mall in North Carolina...
Things that make you go Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm....?
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: autopat51
a reply to: markosity1973
true..a war with no battle lines, no clear enemy..a war of terror.
what could be worse really?
So we're now supposed to go through life afraid of Muslims, Blacks, Clintons, Syrian Immigrants, etc..
originally posted by: Xcathdra
a reply to: CyberSonic
I dont think it was a false flag..
I am thinking it was a probe of the security / police response -
* - Several people call in shots fired in the terminal knowing that a single call would most likely not get a major response.
They would then see the response of police / security. They can get an idea of how long it would take for the police / security to arrive and what directions they will be coming from. They can also get an idea of the weapon types employed. They got to see the evacuation of the terminal and how it was accomplished. They also get an idea of how many police / security personnel responded.
I will bet the reporting parties either did not give their names or gave false info.
I can keep going but you get the idea.
Either or I hope it was just a hoax.