It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ColdChillin
a reply to: SudoNim
LMAO. She is toast, dude.
How much does the campaign pay you to get on sites like ATS and scream bs, anyway? I've always wondered.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: ColdChillin
All they care about is she will be the first female president.
Isn't that a wonderful thing.
originally posted by: ntech
With all the lying she did under oath Congress ought to slap her with a contempt of Congress citation. Now that would be fun to watch.
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
Can these be falsified?
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: SudoNim
Qu'vatlh Tera'gan
originally posted by: cavtrooper7
a reply to: SudoNim
I have a 115 IQ and I'm an artist.
originally posted by: RickinVa
Looks like the Hillster got some problems....
The Court is persuaded that Secretary Clinton’s testimony is necessary to enable her to explain on the record the purpose for the creation and operation of the clintonemail.com system for State Department business
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today announced it submitted questions to former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton concerning her email practices. Clinton’s answers, under oath, are due on September 29. On August 19, U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan granted Judicial Watch further discovery on the Clinton email matter and ordered Clinton to answer the questions “by no later than thirty days thereafter….” Under federal court rules, Judicial Watch is limited to twenty-five questions.