It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Zaphod58
The Air Force's latest plan for the T-X program is a great example of a "what could possibly go wrong" plan. Any offering that exceeds the standards put forth in the RFP will see a cost incentive added to their bid, lowering the total cost of their aircraft.
For every 0.1G over 6.5 $13.2M comes off. For every 0.1 over 7, up to 7.5 or $88M, $4.4M comes off.
For every 0.5° above the 20° AoA requirement, up to 23°, $6.4M comes off. For 23-25° it's $3.2, up to $51M.
The turn around requirement is 45 minutes after landing. For every minute under 45, $4.3M comes off.
What could possibly go wrong with this idea?
www.flightglobal.com...
“Based on the multiple reviews with industry, the air force now has a much better appreciation of the potential value of performance above threshold capability,”
Contractors would receive a $13.2 million decrement to its price for every 0.1G above the threshold of 6.5Gs, and $4.4 million for every 0.1G above 7.0G. The service set a 7.5G ceiling with a maximum $88 million price reduction, according to the draft RFP.
(snip)
“Based on the multiple reviews with industry, the air force now has a much better appreciation of the potential value of performance above threshold capability,” Air Force spokesman Maj Rob Leese says
(snip)
While the reductions provide an attractive incentive for bidders, the call for advanced capabilities could work against contractors offering an off-the-shelf option, according to Lexington Institute chief operating officer Loren Thompson. With the final RFP due in December, industry could still suggest changes to the Air Force’s latest cost incentives, he said.
(Same article)
Instead, Northrop had secretly begun a new clean-sheet design to closely match the evolving T-X requirements. Scaled Composites, a wholly owned subsidiary of Northrop Grumman, will construct the prototype, with a first flight expected near the end of 2015. Northrop has not indicated how many engines the aircraft will have, nor have they publicly announced the name of the project.
en.wikipedia.org...
Still, the price reductions might not only spur innovation, but the quantified incentives could quell some of the contract protests that have besieged the US Defense Department in recent years, according to Dan Goure, an analyst at the Lexington Institute.
(first article)
originally posted by: Zaphod58
What could possibly go wrong with this idea?
www.flightglobal.com...
originally posted by: SonOfThor
a reply to: Zaphod58
Things are always more complicated with large projects but a general rule of thumb is the more complex / mathematical the evaluation criteria and process, the more likely a protest is to ensue.
There's a reason why contracting officers prefer firm fixed price contracts.