It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: pirhanna
The civil rights act is what changed how people identified with the two parties so that African Americans got behind the democrats, and many southern caucasions decided they liked the republican party better. The republican party was indeed the party of Lincoln, abolition and temperance. The republican party of Lincoln did not in fact become the modern democratic party. That is a fabrication of modern leftists and nothing but political chicanery. So, its really simpler than anyone makes it out to be if one doeant discount parts of history in order to form false political narratives.
originally posted by: Cygnis
originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: sirlancelot
Because black people don't owe their vote to a party because of something that happened in the 1800's.
But apparently every white person owes them reparations for things that were done to them back then, not personally mind you, but because of what was done to others.. /sarc
Then how do you explain the fact that they did flip flop. This in no way is an insult to your party. The 2 parties were completely different a hundred years ago. This took years to happen, it was very gradual. And it could happen again.
There were two important effects of the Civil War upon the Republican Party (aside from the lasting effects of winning the war).
First, it became the party of Big Government and high taxes. It favored a centralized national government over state and local governance. The Republican war effort required high taxes to pay for men and their supplies, and that supported the industrialization process that went along with war. It became closely tied to northern manufacturing interests, which included a greatly enlarged class of millionaires created by war profiteering. Second, it took on the virtuous role of favoring the abolition of slavery and the improvement of the lives of economically deprived citizens, both Negro and those of European descent. This role is highlighted by the Homestead Act of 1862, which provided free land to western settlers.
originally posted by: MrBlaq
a reply to: veracity
Then how do you explain the fact that they did flip flop. This in no way is an insult to your party. The 2 parties were completely different a hundred years ago. This took years to happen, it was very gradual. And it could happen again.
With me you're wasting your time following the manipulative philosophy
of Joseph Goebbels "If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it,
people will eventually come to believe it"
I doubt it will dissuade your inclination for dishonesty, but the fact of
the matter is repeating the same lie over and over doesn't make it true
originally posted by: Metallicus
Well, the people that should have apologized and the people that should have been apologized to are all long dead so none of this matters in 2016.
originally posted by: Metallicus
originally posted by: TheAmazingYeti
originally posted by: Cygnis
originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: sirlancelot
Because black people don't owe their vote to a party because of something that happened in the 1800's.
But apparently every white person owes them reparations for things that were done to them back then, not personally mind you, but because of what was done to others.. /sarc
The thing is the US gov never really officially closed the book and made things right. It was just like "yay, you're equal now!"
It should have been followed by a heart felt apology rather than anger and resentment.
I mean come on. If Germany can pay reparations for WW2 the US could have done something a bit more classy...
Well, the people that should have apologized and the people that should have been apologized to are all long dead so none of this matters in 2016.
originally posted by: Atsbhct
a reply to: sirlancelot
Because black people don't owe their vote to a party because of something that happened in the 1800's.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: MrBlaq
Then how do you explain the fact that they did flip flop. This in no way is an insult to your party. The 2 parties were completely different a hundred years ago. This took years to happen, it was very gradual. And it could happen again.
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: Metallicus
Well, the people that should have apologized and the people that should have been apologized to are all long dead so none of this matters in 2016.
No, they are not, segregation was only abolished in the '60s, which means only 50 years ago black people were treated as inferior and suffered physical and psychological abuse, because it was legal or not punishable to do so.
So many of the people who should be apologized to are still alive.
originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: MrBlaq
Then how do you explain the fact that they did flip flop. This in no way is an insult to your party. The 2 parties were completely different a hundred years ago. This took years to happen, it was very gradual. And it could happen again.