Democrats controlling news media

a reply to: Nikola014

I certainly don't always agree with you.

However on this and many other issues, I strongly do agree with you.

The realities on this score are hideous . . . the Eloi are being increasingly shuffled off to the caverns of the Morlachs and no one seems to care or even pay any attention.

The CONTROLLERS are incredibly effective.

I hope you continue to try and wake folks up.

a reply to: olaru12

Evidently your research is greatly lacking.

You might look up the oligarchy's boast of buying out the major media organizations in 1915 and 1917.

If you really have not read the globalists boasts in their own words . . . you are hazarding yourself and your family with your ignorance.

Or, perhaps you are dedicated to their view of reality and the world.

ABSOLUTELY INDEED. BEARS REPEATING

originally posted by: neo96
This people is why the borg queen must fail in November.

When the media is actively shilling on their behalf ?

That's not ANYONE you want sitting in the oval.

Resistance must be EPIC!

a reply to: syrinx high priest

NONSENSE.

Are you reallllly THAT . . . unaware . . .

of the EXTREME LOPSIDED extreme left/globalist bias of 99.9% of the media, movies, education institutions etc?

Why has your existence been so mind numbingly sheltered? Mystifying.

Fox news may well be the token, sometimes right-view perspective in the media world--the oligarchy has long been massively skilled at controlling all extremes against the middle.

To whatever degree they dare to tell the truth and hold up some conservative, right wing views--more power to them. Otherwise, Orwell's reality would be even more complete than it already is.

a reply to: TheBulk

THANKS. CONGRATS.

Wasn't aware of your channel. Should be required viewing of every student above the age of 8, imho.

Sigh.

Yes the only media shilling that is acceptable is on the right.

I hear you guys call that kind of thing "fair and balanced." *snork*

I'd like to see arguments for the news to be separated from all opinion if it's to be called news, what say?

a reply to: mOjOm

I think the controlling interests owning/controlling 98-99+% of the media

are down to 6 families/organizations.

6.

Six for 350 million people . . . and the world wide situation is not much better.

Sheesh. No way is that remotely healthy or freedom loving.

Bears repeating:

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: syrinx high priest
they both do it. faux news is an extension of the GOP

Well they aren't doing a very good job of being an extension of the GOP as they don't even attempt to hide their contempt for their nominee. If anything Fox has joined the Bush family in openly supporting Hilary. There is no 'conservative' news anymore...at least not this year.

a reply to: mOjOm

I think your tabulation is greatly flawed.

It's a wonder when any conservative views get much air-time anywhere but a relative minority of media--largely talk radio and some net channels.

Lol ... Or perhaps Mr. Trump is seen for the film flam artist he is?

Since when is Trump the heart of Conservatism??!

The victim complex is strong.

originally posted by: southbeach
a reply to: BlueAjah

If i owned a news station and some nobody like Wasserman Shultz told me the article needed to be changed i would laugh in her face,why don't these so called journalists grow a set.

If the title is being directed for an agenda then it's no longer news it's propaganda.

Actually it's also social engineering.

ABSOLUTELY INDEED!

And it's been going on massively since 1915 & 1917 at increasing sophistication, tyrannical !!!CONTROL!!!, comprehensive scope, devilish manipulation toward one world government and a one world religion.

No surprise there. They noted 150 years ago or more where they were headed and they've succeeded in getting us more than 85% there--maybe more than 95% there.

a reply to: Gryphon66

I gather you are still carrying the screeching pants suit's water.

You are smart enough to be a lot more aware of the painful realities of our era than you typically appear to be.

It's sort of conceivable to expect you to be against such massive media ownership and !!!CONTROL!!! by the oligarchy.

Yet you manage to sound like you are in their pocket, too.

Sigh.

originally posted by: texasgirl
CNN's Jake Tapper is supposedly going to bring up the DNC scandal at 9am (central time ) but we shall see, right?

Jake Tapper was supposed to have his show now but they've replaced it with Fareed Zakaria. Interesting...

Nope, no reporting on the email scandal.

originally posted by: BO XIAN
a reply to: Gryphon66

I gather you are still carrying the screeching pants suit's water.

You are smart enough to be a lot more aware of the painful realities of our era than you typically appear to be.

It's sort of conceivable to expect you to be against such massive media ownership and !!!CONTROL!!! by the oligarchy.

Yet you manage to sound like you are in their pocket, too.

Sigh.

Right because anyone who doesn't agree with your take on the world must be a political operative.

Yeah I'm smart enough to see that the "Oligarchy" isn't on the Democratic or Republican side ... But their own.

a reply to: Gryphon66

Yes. You are right that they control all sides against the middle.

Certainly they control the GOP, too.

And, it will be interesting to see what they are going with Trump.

NEVERTHELESS,

The Dems have long been their point people, major organization to advance their major agenda as far and as fast as possible . . . with as many extreme people and positions as possible.

It is almost as though the DEMS are their group to test the waters for how farrrr down the road to the global goals they can shove the populace how fast.

Sadly, far too much far too fast.

And the GOP--even though it, too, is controlled by the oligarchy--is still the only gnat's fart's worth of resistance to the outrageously extreme stuff they have the DEMS carrying out.

a reply to: BO XIAN

It is your opinion that "The Dems" are the villains in your scenario.

It's more like a role-playing game than anything else ... or perhaps "Rock-em, Sock-em Robots."

Don't you find it telling that both the Left and the Right claim to be in favor of individual rights and personal liberty ... EXCEPT when they are in power?

The power is the problem. Authoritarianism is the enemy of freedom ... wherever it is found.

Always with this nonsense. The media covers the story that draws the most eye balls so they can make revenue. Some like FOX and MSNBC slant one way or the other during their opinion pieces, not because they care but, because they have a target audience for their advertisers to sell to. Other than that they cover what draws people, war, violence, sex, celebrities etc.

Trump knows this as his entire campaign has depended on free media coverage non stop. Crazy sells. Scandals that involve sex or a big name get tons of coverage. Clinton's email scandal was over a possible misdemeanor, the only reason a misdemeanor get coverage that much coverage is if people know the name. Nobody wants to cover a well thought out cohesive immigration plan but, somebody with a known name says something stupid like build a wall and its on the air.

Granted it is only natural to blame others for a candidates own failings. The gets it in both directions, they pro right, they are pro left depending on the day and who is in office.

a reply to: BO XIAN

They say that 90% is owned by those 6. Which is Comcast, News Corp., Disney, CBS, Time Warner and Viacom. This was in 2012. In the 80's all the same media was owned by 50 different organizations. There has been mass consolidation bringing that 50 down to 6.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Were you born yesterday? The Democrats and Republicans both have their own media outlets.

a reply to: MrSpad

You seem to be missing the point of the OP.
The DNC emails leaked PROVE that the DNC was colluding and controlling the message the media was generating.
That goes way beyond bias.