It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Misterlondon
That's easy. Loud with no smell. Because that's fun for everyone.
Lmao. depends on my environment.
originally posted by: Misterlondon
OK.. This one has me torn.. What would you rather, all your farts were silent but really deadly or all your farts were extremely loud but had no smell..
I suggest I would make a thread asking other members there philosophical view and give them from my perspective why their view on might or might no be invalid and/or valid giving alternate perspectives on the subject.
originally posted by: MaddenedRambler
I guess I'll bite. After all, I like flowing brain juices and perspectives.
How does one best (most efficiently) establish common groundwork and a like frame of reference from which to observe what differences there are between their philosophical viewpoints, and thus from there come to the best question to ask in order to stimulate their veracious cognitive appetites?
Yup, dumping responsibility.
playing sims 3 I'm organic, while my soul is controlling the sim he is not oraganic in perspective. But I am. Therefore he is too. And when he's long gone, my soul lives on
originally posted by: Ophiuchus 13
If ALL* CREATOR Creations are found to be primarily Spirit - Soul energy and or inorganic except when manifested by themselves or by others controlling them, would that mean that the primary habitats for said Souls-Spirits is too inorganic?
What would those Souls-Spirits of the Created (who were captured) within one or many other inorganics manifestations perceive as reality? The manifested Habitat or the primary habitat?
How would the captured inorganic view the inorganics controlling their reality?
NAMASTE*******
How else could I express my opinion on the meaning of life to you with no means to communicate my thoughts to you?
originally posted by: GemmyMcGemJew
Without using words, what is the meaning of life?
I think not
originally posted by: carewemust
originally posted by: ssenerawa
god Might be formless therefore no need for to grow
originally posted by: kibric
Ok
How does God grow ?
Does GOD know from the moment he creates us, everything we're going to do in this life, and the date we will physically die?
originally posted by: ssenerawa
I suggest I would make a thread asking other members there philosophical view and give them from my perspective why their view on might or might no be invalid and/or valid giving alternate perspectives on the subject.
originally posted by: MaddenedRambler
I guess I'll bite. After all, I like flowing brain juices and perspectives.
How does one best (most efficiently) establish common groundwork and a like frame of reference from which to observe what differences there are between their philosophical viewpoints, and thus from there come to the best question to ask in order to stimulate their veracious cognitive appetites?
Yup, dumping responsibility.
originally posted by: ssenerawa
How else could I express my opinion on the meaning of life to you with no means to communicate my thoughts to you?
originally posted by: GemmyMcGemJew
Without using words, what is the meaning of life?