It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed.
originally posted by: desert
a reply to: Gryphon66
It may be that the theory of the Second Amendment gets tested. Unsettling times.
The phrase out there,"tyranny of the govt", has included taking of property as well as life. A group may well be concerned with taking of property, another group the taking of life.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: NOTurTypical
Everything you cited has to do with the individual's right to stand up against GOVERNMENT not just "the Fed" as the NRA likes to say, but at any level: national, State or local.
Do you really think such simplistic attempts are going to work?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: NOTurTypical
The FEDERAL government at the time of the Second was TINY, had no standing forces, and had to call on the State militias for defense... This was by DESIGN at the time.
The claim that the Second Amendment only regards Federal government overreach is absurd.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: projectvxn
That's a telling citation and absolutely true.
I think some of the citizens in my little scenario have reached that exact point.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: NOTurTypical
That does not imply that the only need for an armed people would have been opposition of the Federal government which was, at the time, toothless, if you actually read the context of any of those quotes you copied and pasted, you'd realize that they were concerned about ANY standing force at the disposal of ANY level of Government.
"I can speak for every patriot that's standing here today that we're here in defense and support of this community to say enough is enough," Matt Krol, an executive officer in the militia group, said, per MLive.com. "We're not going to allow the government, be it the small, local government or the big government to step on the people of Flint any longer. Someone needs to be held accountable."
He added: “If it means having to take up arms in defense ... we will do that as well,” the Detroit Free Press reported.
A self-styled "militia" — one that shares similar ideas with the armed occupation of a wildlife refuge in Oregon — is now joining in Flint, Michigan's recovery effort after a public health disaster involving the city's water supply. The group, which calls itself the Genesee County Volunteer Militia and consists of members from states around the Midwest, is passing out bottled water and filters and is railing on government big and small for its role in the crisis.
originally posted by: projectvxn
What happened in Dallas really shook the hell out of me. Imagine if there had been more than one shooter. Imagine if this had been a coordinated attack by a trained organization. The level of carnage would have been immense. Now imagine that at a national scale.
I don't want it. I fear it as should any sane human being.
That said, I believe the right of revolution in tandem with the right to bear arms is absolutely fundamental to us and should remain intact. One day we will need it, and one day that kind of bloodshed will be worth the sacrifice. But today is not that day..
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: Xtrozero
Protests everywhere from Atlanta to San Francisco indicate otherwise ... At least in terms of the "social unrest" claim ... Believe me I personally watched several thousand people gather yesterday in Atlanta, impromptu, all talking about the same message.
The facts disagree with the "it's all media hype" narrative.