LIVE: FBI Director testifies before House Oversight Committee at 10am est. Live feed

I think all the trolls on ATS(for whatever subject) could learn a lot from Cummings. Listen to him hammer away on the unimportant "3 emails" and the little C's. Right after Chaffetz got him to admit that hillary gave access of classified information to people without security clearance.

That's how you do it, sidestep the big questions and damning answers and just peck away at nonsense until everyone gets tired and goes home.

originally posted by: butcherguy

originally posted by: introvert
The meltdown is continuing.

Wait until Philly later this month, if you think the Demmycrats are melting down now.

I wasn't talking about the Democrats.

So, Hillary Clinton gave access of her classified emails to un-secure people?

a reply to: dukeofjive696969

NO, three that we know of. Only three that the FBI could retrieve out of 30,000 that were deleted. By her attorneys. Who had no clearance to be reviewing anything.

So retroactive classification was a "thing"?

Did I hear that right?

a reply to: xuenchen

They weren't withheld. Wrong verb. They were deleted as personal.

I've got to say, this has been a lot more fun than I thought it would be. Screw that Hamilton and all the buzz. This is real entertainment.

I was going to just throw it away, but after today that mint(still in the package) Cummings action figure I have is now the pride and joy of my collection.

FBI just struck down Cummings, he is such an ass!

a reply to: Stormdancer777

No to the server for maintenance. Not the e mails.

a reply to: Sillyolme

Shouldn't that be a determination for the FBI? I mean three of them did contain classified info, so not personal.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
So, Hillary Clinton gave access of her classified emails to un-secure people?

YUP....Knowing full well that with Attorney-Client privilege, they couldn't testify against or incriminate her.

WHAT the FBI did could hardly be called an 'investigation'.

And 'politics' were not in play my snip.

originally posted by: Sillyolme
a reply to: Realtruth

He happens to be very well respected. Both sides.

"Both sides?" So independents get the shaft again. We get no side.

Here comes Mr. Chaffetz setting up future investigations. The best that could possibly come out of this hearing anyway.

So they DIDN'T look to see if she provided false information....WHAT???? What they hell did they investigate????

OH!!! He just asked Comey if the Clinton Foundation was tied into this investigation!!

Of course, Comey won't answer that.

originally posted by: neo96
So Comey would have us believe that FBI INVESTIGATIONS are 'democratic' !!!

Who is stupid enough to believe that ?

Noooos, he meant the investigations are "bought and paid for" by the Democrats.

Cheers - Dave

a reply to: Martin75

Only that which could be minimally used to conclude no charges should be pressed?

Don't go out of the mandate right?

Oooo, so he will NOT answer to any ties with the investigation into the CLINTON FOUNDATION...interesting......

Well, looks like we found the stonewall at the end of the yellow brick road.

Looks like he's clammed up.