It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Congress: More time investigating Benghazi than 9/11 - JFK - Watergate - Pearl Harbour

page: 1

log in


posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 01:48 PM
Link to Source

Congressional investigations have a way of stretching from months to years, but the House committee probe into 2012’s Benghazi attack was especially lengthy. At two years and four months, it was longer than Congressional probes into 9/11, Watergate, the JFK assassination and Pearl Harbor.

One can claim Benghazi is proof of conspiracy on HRC's behalf, sure. Certainly it was a mess. Im going to note that I feel this article is partisan to Democrat side, but as long as the numbers stand up (I think it would be a bold lie if not) I ask people what's the real conspiracy?

Four Americans died at the U.S. embassy in Libya.

Republicans launched the investigation with a focus on Hillary Clinton, but Democrats accuse them of using Benghazi as a political weapon, especially after this from comment from Republican leadership.

“Everybody thought Hillary Clinton was unbeatable, right?" Rep. Kevin McCarthy asked on Fox News. "But we put together a Benghazi special committee, a select committee. What are her numbers today?”

The final report finds no new evidence of wrongdoing by Clinton.

Is it what happened at Benghazi? Or is it the fact that more time and effort was put into looking into a minor incident, comparatively - when you consider 9/11 - JFK - Pearl Harbour

All 3 had far greater impact on the American public. All 3 completely changed the face of the country. All 3 had huge red flags indicating cover-ups and ulterior motives. Yet more time was spent trying to sabotage HRC's run to the White House. (I'm sure some are happy about that.)

Not the point though.

This reminds me of when they claim, "we need to invade _______ because = genocide." or "we need to overthrow _________ because = human rights."

But then you check foreign aide for that year and realize they are giving money to countries with dictators guilty of their own war crimes. Genocidal dictators in some cases. Or they put people in power with massive human right's abuses. Or they overthrew a good president for the people, and installed a CIA-puppet that runs a totalitarian state.

It would be great if there were structured guidelines and laws, that governed the governors. Imagine that. A disaster, act of aggression, etc-anyone over (x) amount of deaths and an investigation must be done that accomplishes (x), (y) & (z). Crime scenes (destroyed buildings) cannot be shipped off for reprocessing, they must be handled like a real crime scene, etc

World Politics? Yup, that too. Guidelines. Like how the UN has resolutions, guidelines almost, but not really. Stuff that no one follows. Countries on the security council that threaten world security. What if they can't just pick and choose which dictator they plan to overthrow this week? What if they have guidelines, if any country does ____, _____, or _____, they must submit to _____ and then sanctions, and then bla bla and wa wa until a coalition war is declared to rid the world of genocidal dictators or human rights abuses or whatever.

Imagine a world that made sense, basically. Governments that worked towards the stated goals excuses they currently use when a country without a private central bank a super bad enemy pops up, which the US World Police & UN-EU-Zion-a-stan Armies must eradicate.

Imagine government that investigated not because of political affiliation and partisan politics but because they wanted to learn why 3000 of their people died and who exactly was behind it, who knew about it, and who acted or didn't act on intel that was widely known before the events happened.

This message has been brought to you by the letter-T for Tinfoil.

edit on 4-7-2016 by boncho because: (no reason given)

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 02:04 PM
a reply to: boncho

IMO-There is "more on the line" with the Benghazi investigation with so much more red tape involved because of the traitor that is being investigated and the position of power that the traitor is running for.

The guilty parties involved in each are obvious in both cases- Hillary/Benghazi and Saudi Arabia/911-however-politicians have become completely above the law.

The only way to get justice for Benghazi (or ANY crime committed by this traitorous administration) is an armed revolt by
the American people.

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 02:27 PM
I don't call the 4 deaths of Americans to be minor.

Or the clear concerted EFFORT to lie about it from the beginning.

Benghazi happened on a 911 anniversary, and instead of calling it WHAT is was.

LiE,LIE,LIE about it.

Even better I wonder why BENGHAZI doesn't have it's own dedicated forum.

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 02:56 PM
one could agree that the reason they didn`t need to spend so much time on those other things is because they already knew what happened before it even happened. with bengazi maybe there was a much smaller group of people who were in the loop.

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 03:21 PM
I don't understand how "no wrongdoing " can be said.

HRC blatantly and knowingly lied to the American people about the cause of the attack, we know it was intentionally because she told her daughter the truth, that it was a terrorist attack.

Also, when HRC told Chelsea the truth was she not divulging classified info?

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 03:55 PM
a reply to: abe froman

All part of the greater narrative. If we don't call a spade a spade, then it's not a spade. Saw it with the Orlando attack. The current administration doesn't think calling this one particular thing what it actually is, is very important and indeed doesn't matter.

Because you know, not calling it what it is denies "them" the publicity they want. A strategy which is clearly working out marvelously.

posted on Jul, 4 2016 @ 05:36 PM
The FBI knows they need to warch their Ps and Qs, or they will be dealt with shortly. The big story isnt bengazi, Its the Clinton foundation, and they know this can blow up in their faces, hence the slow movement. Lots of people involved. Powerful people

posted on Jul, 5 2016 @ 10:31 AM
a reply to: neo96

I don't call the 4 deaths of Americans to be minor.

Compared to the death of 3000, plus the actions which helped start a war, which was initiated off a foundation of lies-but used that event as a political tool to get the war started-which led to killing 500,000 and indirect cause of death reportedly around 2 Million people.

Or the death of 2,500 people, injury of 1,500 which caused the initiation of the country to begin its step into the largest war in the world's history. Total death toll WWII = 60 Million, and 500,000 American troops lost.

And finally the President of the United States. What's considered the most powerful man in the world, of the most powerful country in the world, of a political lineage, and that case specifically is representative of everything that's come to pass since then.

It's minor in respect to these cases in comparison. 3 cases which caused the most profound changes in the US political and social landscape, which had far more affecting consequences on its people, on people from other countries, on foreign policy, etc-they were investigated less, than a single one off case, which, is likely to be part of a larger scheme in scope but by itself very minor, in comparison.

Or the clear concerted EFFORT to lie about it from the beginning.

You like lies though. You are partisan. Anyone who is in favour for or supports, perpetuates partisan politics is asking to be lied to. You are part of the reason they get away with their lies so well.

The government lies about everything. The lies did not begin or were invented during Benghazi, they are part of a much larger much older scheme that has been at play since the very beginning of the other cases that mentioned.

Specifically Libya however, has been involved in numerous, much larger lies, with a way bigger potential impact over the region and at home. And Mossad's fingerprints are al over Libya - in numerous false flag events. The real question is what happened in Benghazi or what was happening that went against Mossag's agenda? Since numerous other Mossad/False Flag events do not get investigated, or very weakly if they do. Mossad and Zionists obviously weren't happy with what was going on in Benghazi, because normally they shut up or cover up their false flags.

For some reason there is more investigation happening on these events, than events which were 10x-100x-1000x in scope. Mossad and the Zionists for some reason probably want you prosecuting Benghazi. Which makes any cries for Benghazi, the person is acting as a tool for the worst blight on US foreign policy there is & has ever been, in the last 100 years.

Benghazi happened on a 911 anniversary, and instead of calling it WHAT is was.

LiE,LIE,LIE about it.

Yes, that's my entire point, now you got it! You are being lied to about it. Somehow Benghazi has got more investigative time than 9/11 - the absolute worst modern attack on America, which is reposible indirectly for the Patriot Act, the Iraq War, etc - Also full of LIES

BUT, for some reason Benghazi, which barely compares in scope and scale, is getting more investigative time? Why is that?

Mossad - Linked to 9/11 - Truck of Israelis dancing as the towers fell, hailed as heroes when they went back. Mossad fingerprints all over it. A joke of an investigation - parts of it still classified to this day.

Other false flag events Mossad is tied to:

USS Liberty: Investigation concluded 'whoops'

Issued reports that concluded the attack was a mistake due to Israeli confusion about the ship's identity,[2] though others, including survivors of the attack, have rejected these conclusions and maintain that the attack was deliberate.[7]

Murder of Police Woman Yvonne Fletcher: Mossad Linked, directly responsible for removing political red tape for bombing campaigns into Libya.

Fletcher's murder would later become a major factor in the then prime minister Thatcher's decision to allow U.S. President Ronald Reagan to launch the USAF bombing raid on Libya in 1986 from American bases in Britain.

Lockerbie Bombing - Pan Am 103:

"Mossad blew up Pan AM 103 and blamed it on Libya. Unfortunately, the plane was late and blew up overland, and all the evidence pointed towards Israel. Israel's goal was to demonize the Muslims, and lay the groundwork for 9/11."

LaBelle Disco:

"As part of a Libya False flag, the Mossad sent a series of false messages out of Tripoli, talking of an impending attack. The Mossad then bombed a German Disco, the Labelle Club, killing three and wounding 230. President Reagan was convinced it was a Libyan attack, and retaliated by bombing Libya World opinion turned against Libya".

Mossad connection to the JFK assassination.

Mossad Connection to 9/11

Libya - Mossad Operations

Confessions of an ex-Mossad agent

Mossad's link to the murder of Yvonne Fletcher.

Mossad Links to Lockerbie Bombing Pan Am 103 - False Flag

German TV Exposes Mossad/LaBelle Disco attack Links

All these false flag operations are tied back to Mossad, many of them are directly or indirectly related to Libya and a much larger overarching effort at controlling and affecting world events and the geopolitical climate. Each false flag had horrible investigations done, cover-ups, distraction/diversions, some outside force shutting down or making excuses to prevent hard facts and a conclusion to be made, especially anything that would implicate Mossad in a way that would or should enrage the American public. Instead just weak 'public closure'. Not real closure.

And yet, for some reason, Benghazi has been getting more attention than some of the worst attacks ever made against America, by a subversive agency with fingerprints left all over certain incidents. Obviously Benghazi was not in line with the official Mossad agenda, because it's clear when they are involved, everything hushes up really quick.

Of course Mossad is linked to Benghazi too. But they don't appear to be using the normal slight of hand they have in that past. Why is that? Maybe they were happy with what was going on at the time. Maybe the "movie" thing was engineered to be an implausible 'cover' purposely to sink the administration because they didn't follow their barking orders. I listened to a pod cast yesterday with Larry Nichols, saying "Benny" (Netenyaho) was upset at POTUS over Libya, and directly involved in Benghazi. So that could explain the fallout, the Obama administration bit the hand that feeds them? But clearly Mossad is all over this like every other operation in Libya (or anywhere in the ME)...Contrary to their normal False Flags, it appears they want this one investigated for some reason.

So here's the real question, why is it you care so much again?
edit on 5-7-2016 by boncho because: (no reason given)

new topics

top topics


log in