It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
I think things like trade, jobs, and immigration are what people like about him.
Plus the fact that he can talk without being fully scripted via a teleprompter.
He's also one of the few (if only) billionaires to run for office.
People must see that as a strong quality in a leader (running successful businesses and negotiating trade deals, etc).
He has filed for bankruptcy five times. He lost money running a casino in New Jersey! He is a failure as a businessman, a compulsive liar, and a sexist, racist hate monger who single handedly destroyed an entire football league. And yet, people support this small fingered vulgarian. Why?
Filed for bankruptcy. He filed for protection and it was 4, not 5 times. They were Chapter 11 which does not have to mean the company has no money. It means there are issues and they are going to try to protect themselves from losing it. The purpose is to save the company.
1 - He filed because of the Taj Mahal Casino. He reorganized and lost half his stake. Nothing changed for the business and it is still there and has his name on it.
2- He filed and again, to pay off his debts, gave up 49% of his stake. Building is still there and has his name on it.
3- He filed for the same Casino, Taj, 20 years after the first filing. He still owns 27% and is the largest shareholder.
4 - He filed for Trump entertainment. He reduced his ownership to 10%. Still around.
So, you see, if you would simply research you would see that he filed bankruptcy and saved the businesses. Otherwise, they would have been liquidated, everyone loses their jobs and it is a loss.
HE STILL OWNS THESE COMPANIES....
The USFL? Hahahaha...he was an owner and they tried to move to the fall. It did not work. This did not kill the league. League was dead before he bought the Generals.
originally posted by: theMediator
originally posted by: BelowLowAnnouncement
Well ... if I was American ... I wouldn't care what Donald Trump says.
I'd just vote for him to annoy people like you.
That's about 50% of the reason why I voted to leave EU. To annoy the noisy, agree-or-die 'mainstream opinion' holders. If the world burns along the way, well I'm fine with that as long as you're burning too!
This type of mentality is why we can't have anything good. Sometimes I wish the old and bitter losers could just shut up and let people with dreams alone instead of being negative about it and actually work against people with dreams. Just like the guy that says ''it will fail'' and then make sure that it does. It's a losers, disgusting, regressive, selfish, stupid, destructive mentality and there is absolutely nothing to be proud about it.
originally posted by: BelowLowAnnouncement
I'd just vote for him to annoy people like you.
The main issue in the strike is the restoration of health insurance and pension benefits that the casino's previous owners — after Trump but before Icahn— got a bankruptcy court judge to do away with in 2014
When you've created hundreds of companies and thousands of jobs, I think 4-5 chapter 11s is a pretty damn good resume.
originally posted by: essentialtremors
a reply to: DJW001
When you've created hundreds of companies and thousands of jobs, I think 4-5 chapter 11s is a pretty damn good resume.
How many companies have you created? How many jobs have you created?
Now, how many times have you failed without ever producing any beneficial?
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: deckdel
Why is it that whenever someone is challenged to point out one thing about Trump that makes him worthy of a vote, all they can do is talk about Hillary Clinton?
Why is it whenever someone is challenged to point out one thing about Hillary that makes her worthy of a vote, all they can do is talk about Trump?
originally posted by: lortl
originally posted by: TechniXcality
a reply to: lortl
I believe SJW is legitimate as it's a proper term and one that's self described. Traitor in certain contexts, for instance any american citizen who radicalizes and attacks as some islamist is a traitor, the other terms I don't use, what else do you have?
Your right and I'm wrong of course
originally posted by: DJW001
a reply to: rollanotherone
Why is it whenever someone is challenged to point out one thing about Hillary that makes her worthy of a vote, all they can do is talk about Trump?
She has had practical experience in government, having served in Congress and as Secretary of State.She has espoused a hard line towards Russian aggression. What are Trump's qualifications?