Mark Zuckerburg actually builds wall after criticizing Trump for just saying he'd do so

a reply to: veracity

isn't that what Disney did?

Obviously Zuck things Trump will do things to hurt his money, and Hillary will do things to make him richer and more powerful in the global community. Right there is all you need to know

a reply to: UnBreakable

There is no hypocrisy here, this is a non story.

You are comparing apples to zucchinis

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: Osfan89

I think a moat is a great idea, why don't people ever build moats anymore?

Just a guess, but I think these days they would be too easy to navigate. Jet ski? I think getting across a moat these days would be a piece of cake. Alligators and all.

a reply to: UnBreakable

I think there is rather a difference to building a wall around a private residence as apposed to building a wall around the southern borders with the specific purpose of keeping people out based on there nationality.

If Zuckerburg were to state the reason for his wall is to retard the entry of Mexicans and called them rapists, murderers and drug dealers, now that would indeed be an issue.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: UnBreakable

There is no hypocrisy here, this is a non story.

You are comparing apples to zucchinis

What, because you say so? Ok.

Is this Zuck?

a reply to: UnBreakable

So, let me get this straight.

It's hypocrisy for a private citizen to wall off their property, which only reflects on them, while saying that a wall around a nation reflects badly on it? Hardly. Mark Zuckerburg is one man, making a choice for himself about his property.

Trump is one man, making a choice for a nation, a choice with which a decent slice of the nation utterly disagree, and will reflect on those individuals as much as it does those who agree with the action. In short, they are entirely different concepts.

Put another way, a private citizen building a wall to keep the government out of his affairs, among others, is a man making use of his liberty. A government building a wall to keep people out, or in, is Orwellian. Reagan was dirt in my opinion, a horrid money headed swine. But even he would have taken a whizz in Trumps cornflakes over his ridiculous plans.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UnBreakable

I think there is rather a difference to building a wall around a private residence as apposed to building a wall around the southern borders with the specific purpose of keeping people out based on there nationality.

If Zuckerburg were to state the reason for his wall is to retard the entry of Mexicans and called them rapists, murderers and drug dealers, now that would indeed be an issue.

Um, there are no Mexicans crossing the border into Hawaii, so he must think everyone is a potential rapist, murderer, and drug dealer. He claims it is a sound barrier. Ever been to Kauia? I have. The only sound is the waves crashing on the beach.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: TheBulk

lol, no its not. Trump is speaking for America when he talks about his wall (I am an American and I do not agree).

Who is Zuckerburg speaking for? Himself, his property.

America is OUR land as a whole and if Americans want a wall it is no different than what MZ is doing. Actually there is a difference.. Mark's wall is to keep out fans, cameras, while America's is to keep out criminals and illegals.. So who's wall is more important?


iTruthSeeker

a reply to: UnBreakable

I think you understand perfectly what i trying to convey, but ile rephrase the wording shall i.

"If Zuckerburg were to state the reason for his wall is to retard the entry of Hawaiian's and called them rapists, murderers and drug dealers, now that would indeed be an issue".

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: UnBreakable
...a decent slice of the nation utterly disagree...

Really?

A majority of Americans agree with Donald Trump that a wall should be built along the U.S. border to prevent illegal immigrants from entry, a new poll has found.

According to a Rasmussen Reports survey of 1,000 likely voters conducted Aug. 17 to 18, 51 percent of likely voters are in favor of building a wall, compared to 37 percent who are against it and 12 percent who are unsure.

www.newsmax.com...

a reply to: andy06shake

I don't think that would be an issue either, its his property and he can take a big sh*t on it if he wants and build a sh*t factory to sell to his fans if he wants. (no one would buy it, hes not that great)

However, Trump is speaking for America (me included) and I disagree, many of us do.

If, however, MZ lived in a neighborhood and payed an HOA that said he could not build a wall around his property...then he may have legal issues (also for the sh*t factory if he chose so).

However it does not in any way have any relevance to Trumps wall!

Mark builds a 6 foot wall....and everyone goes bananas! WTF is wrong with people these days????

www.dailymail.co.uk... bscures-spectacular-panorama-locals.html

a reply to: veracity

I agree it does not have much relevance to Trumps supposed wall. Zuckerburg wanting to or indeed building a wall around his PRIVATE RESIDENCE is hardly synonymous with constructing a wall around the borders of a nation in an attempt to retard entry of a specific set of people.

a reply to: UnBreakable

Survey the whole nation on it, rather than a measly thousand, and see if your result holds. I doubt very much whether you could find such a survey that would accurately model the wider opinion on this issue, unless a much larger sample size was used. But you already knew that, having been around here long enough to know this stuff.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: UnBreakable

I think you understand perfectly what i trying to convey, but ile rephrase the wording shall i.

"If Zuckerburg were to state the reason for his wall is to retard the entry of Hawaiian's and called them rapists, murderers and drug dealers, now that would indeed be an issue".

Don't be ridiculous, of course he won't say that. But his actions sure speak louder than words. He would rather piss off his neighbors, which he is doing, for obvious security, under the guise of a 'sound barrier' (because, you know, it's so obnoxiously loud in Kauai.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: Osfan89

Why?

Well first of all, it's Mark Zuckerburg. If he is having a pool party, I would imagine that those attending are going to be of the relatively famous variety, and don't want to be photographed in their bathing suits by perverts, weirdos, and other professional photojournalists. Also, if he wants to be able to walk around his home and garden with his manhood flapping in the breeze, then he should be able to do that, without having to worry about offending someone, and without the risk of being easily surveilled from positions around his property. If he wants to lay down with a woman next to his koi fish pond, or get it on in his pool, the chances are that he is not going to want to have to concern himself with what the neighbours think of his behaviour.

Also, it is his personal property, and frankly, if we are really living in a world where even Zuckerburg cannot afford some bloody privacy, then we really are all pretty much doomed.

No, no. He should invite the nosy neighbors and paparazzi in, give them free food and drinks, and offer to pay their college tuition.

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: andy06shake

I don't think that would be an issue either, its his property and he can take a big sh*t on it if he wants and build a sh*t factory to sell to his fans if he wants. (no one would buy it, hes not that great)

However, Trump is speaking for America (me included) and I disagree, many of us do.

If, however, MZ lived in a neighborhood and payed an HOA that said he could not build a wall around his property...then he may have legal issues (also for the sh*t factory if he chose so).

However it does not in any way have any relevance to Trumps wall!

How on Earth can you not want a wall? You can not and do not have a country if it has no borders. What keeps the stuff in your home safe? The walls surrounding your stuff. Master lock on the front door is the border checkpoint. Understand?

iTruthSeeker

originally posted by: TheBulk

originally posted by: veracity
a reply to: UnBreakable

This is not the same, its his property, he can do whatever he wants.

Exactly we can build a wall around our country. The concept is the same.

and getting others to pay for said wall would be fair?
pretty sure zuckerberg is paying for his, himself.

originally posted by: TrueBrit
a reply to: UnBreakable

Survey the whole nation on it, rather than a measly thousand, and see if your result holds. I doubt very much whether you could find such a survey that would accurately model the wiser opinion on this issue, unless a much larger sample size was used. But you already knew that, having been around here long enough to know this stuff.

Alrighty then, let's survey the whole nation in the next presidential political poll to get an exact number. Oh, that's right, it's called an election.

a reply to: UnBreakable

I dont think im being ridiculous building a wall around your home is not the same as building a wall around the southern borders of the USA no matter which way you try to show it. So there is no hypocrisy to to be found. IMHO Zuckerburg should be criticising Trump for his madness.