Democrats Replace Debbie Wasserman Schultz With Clinton’s Pick To Run DNC

originally posted by: Metallicus
a reply to: UnBreakable

This timing is a little too convenient.

I see yet another scandal coming and this time in involves the DNC.

The HuffPo blog in the OP points to a CNN article that more clearly describes that this is a normal transition.

Clinton Campaign Takes Control of DNC

Trump's campaign should be taking control of the RNC about this time, but it isn't. Probably because they are at odds.

a reply to: Kali74

You do realize there's been numerous studies showing that looks do count?

a reply to: TonyS

Oh how corrupt/not corrupt a person is?

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: atomish

Thank you for that. I agree. Nothing will change very much in this country if we let ourselves be scared into voting for the lesser of two evils.

I agree.

It sounds like we are both voting for Trump then.

originally posted by: Metallicus

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: atomish

Thank you for that. I agree. Nothing will change very much in this country if we let ourselves be scared into voting for the lesser of two evils.

I agree.

It sounds like we are both voting for Trump then.

How did you get that from what she said?

And I thought I remember seeing you express the same sentiment, saying you were going to vote for Johnson?

I think I'm missing a joke somewhere lol

a reply to: Metallicus

I actually will need a safe space if you accuse me of such again. I'm writing in Bernie.

originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Metallicus

I actually will need a safe space if you accuse me of such again. I'm writing in Bernie.

Might as well write in Micky Mouse, or Popeye for that matter, Kali. Or not vote at all.

It's going to be Hillary, sadly, because she's crooked enough to have things in place to cheat her way to the top.

Gary Johnson has been a write-in for many election, and hasn't gotten more then 2% - 3% of the votes.

Arguably, I've seen the trend of "He/she who spends the MOST in campaigning wins". Obama spent more then either of the people who ran against him. Bush spent more then Kerry and others. etc.

Clinton is on par for winning, and it makes me ill.

a reply to: Cygnis

It's a heartfelt vote as well as a protest vote. I want the DNC to see how many more supporters they could have had if they had decided to play fair.