It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Spider879
Thank you. Great link.
There was obviously much more direct interaction then has been suspected even 10-20 years ago.
originally posted by: AugustusMasonicus
a reply to: Spider879
Either way, great post. Your anthropology/archeology threads are always a good read.
could completely alter our understanding of history
originally posted by: M4nWithNoN4me
This actually makes perfect sense. For those who are willing to interpret the geologic evidence honestly, it's plain that sea levels used to be lower, as in the case of this city.
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: username74
and we should probably read this
en.wikipedia.org...
The book mentions how when the Spanish made it to Brazil, they wrote that there were already working Portuguese sugar plantations on some of the offshore islands, that were already being worked by african slaves. The Portuguese started the European African slave trade in the late 14th-early 15th century, but they never seem to get any guff about that.
originally posted by: stormcell
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: username74
and we should probably read this
en.wikipedia.org...
On the coast of England, the coastline has retreated inland by three miles over 500+ years. There are maps that show country roads and villages that no longer exist. Whenever there are severe storms that can disintegrate up to 20 meters of cliffs in places.
Extrapolate that over 2000 years and the coastline of any African country could have retreated by 12 miles. That would eliminate any large city.
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
Jericho is that old. Remind me again of why it's not submerged?
because it about 80km inland from the mediterranean near the dead sea with no inlets. and its not located on an ancient shoreline
originally posted by: username74
a reply to: Harte
Jericho is that old. Remind me again of why it's not submerged?
because it about 80km inland from the mediterranean near the dead sea with no inlets. and its not located on an ancient shoreline
And naturally, the largest and most numerous settlements that existed at those times were located where there was easy access to food- on the shoreline, of course. While this info doesn't support the current prevailing historical/scientific narratives, there's plenty of evidence to support it.
originally posted by: Spider879
a reply to: punkinworks10
The book mentions how when the Spanish made it to Brazil, they wrote that there were already working Portuguese sugar plantations on some of the offshore islands, that were already being worked by african slaves. The Portuguese started the European African slave trade in the late 14th-early 15th century, but they never seem to get any guff about that.
Lines dividing the non-Christian world between Spain and Portugal: the 1494 Tordesillas meridian (
Thus when the Pope split the so-called world in half the Portuguese didn't complain for they may have known about Brazil, and yes the Portuguese do get guff but being that most of us concerned our selves with Anglo American history it may seemed that way.