It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: DupontDeux
I'd tell the girls that finished after HER, that her being born with a penis didn't stop girls born with vaginas from beating her.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: DupontDeux
I'd tell the girls that finished after HER, that her being born with a penis didn't stop girls born with vaginas from beating her.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Metallicus
Obviously not in this case or SHE would have come in 1st place every time. This isn't hard... 5th place means 4 people finished before her.
originally posted by: DBCowboy
We should abolish mens and womens differences in sports.
We've made bathrooms unisex, why not sports?
If the ladies can't handle it, then tough.
Equality.
Not "separate but equal".
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
originally posted by: DBCowboy
We should abolish mens and womens differences in sports.
We've made bathrooms unisex, why not sports?
If the ladies can't handle it, then tough.
Equality.
Not "separate but equal".
We are all the same, gender's do not exist. Let's do it.
originally posted by: DupontDeux
a reply to: Profusion
It should not be allowed.
And more importantly, the athlete should not want to.
It is simply unsportsmanlike.
And to me at least, unsportsmanlike behavior totally defeats the purpose of entering (amatour) competitions.
originally posted by: mOjOm
a reply to: Kali74
That's what I was thinking. If being male is such an advantage then she should have came in first right???
Obviously there were other natural females on the track who she couldn't beat so maybe the other complainers are just slow and lazy and need to up their game instead.
A skeleton's overall size and sturdiness give some clues. Within the same population, males tend to have larger, more robust bones and joint surfaces, and more bone development at muscle attachment sites. However, the pelvis is the best sex-related skeletal indicator, because of distinct features adapted for childbearing. The skull also has features that can indicate sex, though slightly less reliably.
Sex-related skeletal features are not obvious in children's bones. Subtle differences are detectable, but they become more defined following puberty and sexual maturation.
originally posted by: Brotherman
I highlight this because our bones and muscles are very different between men and woman men have stronger muscles and more robust bones, chemically castrating male children until they are lead into adulthood will make these male features more like females making the body and mind weaker in my opinion, I do not see this as good.