Is the foundation of the three major monothestic religions false?

originally posted by: LauGhing0ne
a reply to: TerryDon79

Well actually it closer to 85% of the world, and i would probably say about 99% has a belief in something maybe not an organized religion.

Link - Article

Please always source your statements.

That article links back to a religious site so of course they would inflate the numbers lol.

Why would I need to source my statement when I was referencing from another posters source?

originally posted by: robbeh
Praise bacon !!


It's easier

Bow down to the new messiah

a reply to: Klassified

You cant use a picture and a source to a conspirator, that is called facts and its bad.

But, i like the framework you did on the pic

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: LauGhing0ne
a reply to: TerryDon79

Well actually it closer to 85% of the world, and i would probably say about 99% has a belief in something maybe not an organized religion.

Link - Article

Please always source your statements.

That article links back to a religious site so of course they would inflate the numbers lol.

Why would I need to source my statement when I was referencing from another posters source?

Its still a source, even klassified used a picture for reference, might be easier for you that way?

a reply to: Klassified

I think we've run into a problem. Conflicting sources.

Adherents says 84% are religious, another says 53%, and 65% and so on.

Then there's the statistics that include anyone believing in a God as being religious.

I think I'll leave you guys/gals to it.

(I need another beer)

originally posted by: LauGhing0ne
a reply to: Klassified

You cant use a picture and a source to a conspirator, that is called facts and its bad.

But, i like the framework you did on the pic

Terry and I usually do fine. I think he just wasn't seeing where I was coming up with that, since the wiki article gives other figures that are different. Not real fond of being called dishonest, though. lol.

Thanks. I don't think anyone knows the actual proportions of believers to non, but I figured it was close enough to get the point across.

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: LauGhing0ne
a reply to: Klassified

You cant use a picture and a source to a conspirator, that is called facts and its bad.

But, i like the framework you did on the pic

Not real fond of being called dishonest, though. lol

Yeah, sorry about that. No harm intended.

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Klassified

I think we've run into a problem. Conflicting sources.

Adherents says 84% are religious, another says 53%, and 65% and so on.

Then there's the statistics that include anyone believing in a God as being religious.

I think I'll leave you guys/gals to it.

(I need another beer)

Nothing new bro. Conflicting stats are a way of life on the intertubez and ATS. I usually look more at the average of them, than at actual percentages, but I wasn't going to spend a half hour averaging 10 websites figures, so I just picked one to make a point, which nobody got anyway.

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Klassified

I think we've run into a problem. Conflicting sources.

Adherents says 84% are religious, another says 53%, and 65% and so on.

Then there's the statistics that include anyone believing in a God as being religious.

I think I'll leave you guys/gals to it.

(I need another beer)

Nothing new bro. Conflicting stats are a way of life on the intertubez and ATS. I usually look more at the average of them, than at actual percentages, but I wasn't going to spend a half hour averaging 10 websites figures, so I just picked one to make a point, which nobody got anyway.

That's fair enough.

I did search a bit and it does look like the 1.1 billion figure is used more often than not. *red face*

ETA: I read the thread again, just coz lol.

It's pretty obvious that the religions are wrong. Just look at the errors in "their" history for start.

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Klassified

I think we've run into a problem. Conflicting sources.

Adherents says 84% are religious, another says 53%, and 65% and so on.

Then there's the statistics that include anyone believing in a God as being religious.

I think I'll leave you guys/gals to it.

(I need another beer)

Nothing new bro. Conflicting stats are a way of life on the intertubez and ATS. I usually look more at the average of them, than at actual percentages, but I wasn't going to spend a half hour averaging 10 websites figures, so I just picked one to make a point, which nobody got anyway.

That's fair enough.

I did search a bit and it does look like the 1.1 billion figure is used more often than not. *red face*

ETA: I read the thread again, just coz lol.

It's pretty obvious that the religions are wrong. Just look at the errors in "their" history for start.

Well, you know. The Devil made it look wrong, and all that.

a reply to: Klassified

I think its important to use a credible source with a statement.. But that is just my opinion

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: TerryDon79

originally posted by: Klassified

originally posted by: TerryDon79
a reply to: Klassified

I think we've run into a problem. Conflicting sources.

Adherents says 84% are religious, another says 53%, and 65% and so on.

Then there's the statistics that include anyone believing in a God as being religious.

I think I'll leave you guys/gals to it.

(I need another beer)

Nothing new bro. Conflicting stats are a way of life on the intertubez and ATS. I usually look more at the average of them, than at actual percentages, but I wasn't going to spend a half hour averaging 10 websites figures, so I just picked one to make a point, which nobody got anyway.

That's fair enough.

I did search a bit and it does look like the 1.1 billion figure is used more often than not. *red face*

ETA: I read the thread again, just coz lol.

It's pretty obvious that the religions are wrong. Just look at the errors in "their" history for start.

Well, you know. The Devil made it look wrong, and all that.

And the devil planted bones and stuff to confuse people.

/sarcasm

I still can't believe that, 16 years into the 21st century, people still believe it lol.

I wonder if our whole chronology of history is also a complete fabrication, just to support the OT & NT.

How far does the corruption go?

www.caam.rice.edu...

originally posted by: ClovenSky
I wonder if our whole chronology of history is also a complete fabrication, just to support the OT & NT.

How far does the corruption go?

www.caam.rice.edu...

If they were going to fabricate history to support their bible, wouldn't they fabricate it where the events in the bible actually happened?

There's historical evidence to prove that certain (major) events in the bible never happened (take the flood for example).

a reply to: TerryDon79

About 90% of the Nordic and germanic states has a belief in something, just not the monothestic religions.

I can use this paragraph in one of them to point out how flawed all three of them are.

Beware of the false prophets, who come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly are ravenous wolves. You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn bushes nor figs from thistles, are they? So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit. A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.

All three are corrupted by dualistic ideas (us vs them) creating a cultural state of continuous war that will never end until all three religions are gone from existence either by removing the corruption thru reformations or all humans killing each other from existence.

You can see it in fundamental Christians, Wahabbi and Zionism. All three a manifestation of the insanity/evill hiding in all of the trees. There is nothing as demonic as blind soulless faith dogma, making humans forget the golden rule. Humans are amazing at self deceit. Just look at the Nazi movement. Same dualistic ideas implemented as doctrine causing genocide.

originally posted by: LauGhing0ne
a reply to: TerryDon79

About 90% of the Nordic and germanic states has a belief in something, just not the monothestic religions.

Ok.

I'm not quite sure what your point is, but thanks?

a reply to: TerryDon79

religion means religio = to bind, usually its the same cultural values

Most people of this earth, believes in something. You can in most cases source it to the monothestic religions.
You dont have to believe in a God to be religious, nor does religion need a God for faith.

Link - Wikipedia

a reply to: Klassified

Hmmm, no, nothing wrong with you. You've just put your measure of faith in the concept that there is nothing else there greater than mankind, except maybe aliens.



Not saying you don't have a clue, more like you are willing to bet that since nothing we've experienced thus far can prove the existence of any deity to you (and those like you), you have put your faith in the belief that it will continue to be that way. But in the end, you have just as much faith as any religious person does. Considering the enormity of what we still don't know and have yet to see, you pretty much have to.

So, nope, nothing wrong with you. You've got faith too.

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Klassified

Hmmm, no, nothing wrong with you. You've just put your measure of faith in the concept that there is nothing else there greater than mankind, except maybe aliens.

Not saying you don't have a clue, more like you are willing to bet that since nothing we've experienced thus far can prove the existence of any deity to you (and those like you), you have put your faith in the belief that it will continue to be that way. But in the end, you have just as much faith as any religious person does. Considering the enormity of what we still don't know and have yet to see, you pretty much have to.

So, nope, nothing wrong with you. You've got faith too.

I don't see you hanging garlic about your doors and windows in the expectation that one day vampires will go public. Yeah, go ahead and laugh.