It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: LittleByLittle
Oh my, Rupert Sheldrake? Really?
You mean the guy who time and time again has been busted for doing crappy, unscientific studies?
He's your poster child for "real" science?
Riiight.
originally posted by: elgaz
When a science book is wrong, somebody eventually discovers the mistake and it is corrected in subsequent books. That conspicuously does not happen with holy books."
originally posted by: elgaz
When a science book is wrong, somebody eventually discovers the mistake and it is corrected in subsequent books. That conspicuously does not happen with holy books."
if the electromagnetic spectrum were a reel of film 2500 miles long (stretching from California to Alaska), then the band of visible light would be around 1 inch! According to my calculations, if these numbers are correct, that means that we only perceive 0.00000000631313% of what is really there. So why does mainstream science place so much faith in our 5-sense reality and disregard the unseen as fantasy or imagination, when we are so blind?
originally posted by: GetHyped
a reply to: MarioOnTheFly
What exactly is your complaint here?
originally posted by: BO XIAN
Tuesday 31 May 2016
"Science is a religion with its own priests (who wear white coats not black gowns). It requires belief (faith) in its unprovable theories (doctrine)."
Science is only un-provable to those who chose to be willfully ignorant of it's theories and laws or those that feel threatened by its findings.