It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: matafuchs
What lies? Hounded by the press?
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: atomish
originally posted by: Indigo5
But in my strong opinion ...a Presidential Candidate BSing about giving to veterans for pandering purposes is beyond disqualifying.
I agree. Let's disqualify anyone who has ever used Veterans in some disgusting way to pander to a portion of the electorate.
Lets do exactly that! Hold candidates accountable for the lies they tell.
Strangely, you seem to be suggesting the exact opposite? Your neighbor cheats on their taxes so you decide it's A-OK to walk into a bank with an AK-47 and rob the place.
There is pandering to vets...and there is attempted fraud.
None of it should be tolerated...and the solution is not to decide the worst of it is now acceptable.
I have never seen anything comparable to the level of deceit, lies and greed Trump has proudly displayed and his supporters have defended.
originally posted by: MysticPearl
a reply to: Indigo5
Is this what the left is coming to?
Essentially, crying because they weren't given enough? Give us more, give us more!
originally posted by: atomish
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: atomish
originally posted by: Indigo5
But in my strong opinion ...a Presidential Candidate BSing about giving to veterans for pandering purposes is beyond disqualifying.
I agree. Let's disqualify anyone who has ever used Veterans in some disgusting way to pander to a portion of the electorate.
Lets do exactly that! Hold candidates accountable for the lies they tell.
Strangely, you seem to be suggesting the exact opposite? Your neighbor cheats on their taxes so you decide it's A-OK to walk into a bank with an AK-47 and rob the place.
There is pandering to vets...and there is attempted fraud.
None of it should be tolerated...and the solution is not to decide the worst of it is now acceptable.
I have never seen anything comparable to the level of deceit, lies and greed Trump has proudly displayed and his supporters have defended.
Strangely, we are in agreement and you are suggesting that I am suggesting something I'm not.
Description of Appeal to Common Practice
The Appeal to Common Practice is a fallacy with the following structure:
1.X is a common action.
2.Therefore X is correct/moral/justified/reasonable, etc.
The basic idea behind the fallacy is that the fact that most people do X is used as "evidence" to support the action or practice. It is a fallacy because the mere fact that most people do something does not make it correct, moral, justified, or reasonable.
Well LAST NIGHT he called up a veterans charity and "pledged" 1 Million dollars...
No doubt, Trump Supporters care little about his perpetual stream of lies and scamming...
originally posted by: Indigo5
originally posted by: atomish
Strangely, we are in agreement and you are suggesting that I am suggesting something I'm not.
Apologies...I confused your post with an "everyone does it" post. I have grown exhausted with the ubiquitous logical fallacy employed these days by Trump defenders..
Since they see Hillary as dishonest, then Trump is justified in lying to Vets and the public or any other lie.
Put another way...This is not an OP about Hillary's email scandal nor any other politician...and Hillary's email scandal does not excuse Trump lying to veterans about donating.
originally posted by: matafuchs
These are all of the Vets Organizations who have received money so far...
assets.donaldjtrump.com...
All 19 groups that confirmed receiving money from the Trump event got checks in the mail. Sixteen charities saw donations arrive in late February in increments of $50,000 or $100,000. The other three reported smaller donations in March, with those amounts averaging between $5,000 and $15,000.
Keith David of the Task Force Dagger Foundation told the Journal that he was confused about whether a $50,000 check from Trump associate Stewart Rahr's foundation was tied to the Iowa event. He said he had been informed by a Trump representative that it was.
"It’s a little weird," David said. "It looks like it’s from a totally separate organization."
"With representatives from various veterans organizations and supporters standing behind him, Trump listed the names of groups that have received money from a fundraiser he held at the end of January in lieu of attending a Fox News debate. The amount totaled out to $5.6 million dollars -- not the $6 million in contributions he had originally claimed.
Trump's clarification was laced with contempt for the media coverage that had prompted Tuesday's event, telling reporters that he had "never received such bad publicity for doing such a good job." I will say that the press should be ashamed of themselves, and on behalf of the vets the press should be ashamed of themselves," Trump said. "They are calling me and they are furious because I sent people checks of a lot of money, and we're going to give you the names right now which is what you want, and instead of being like thank you very much, Mr. Trump, or Trump did a good job, everyone is saying who got it, who got it, who got it, and you make me look very bad." The Republican nominee continued to defend himself by saying that he wanted to keep the donations "private" and described the lengthy process by which he donated the money: a vetting of every group who received money followed by a certified check