Security Guard Arrested For Removing Man From Women’s Bathroom

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: Hazardous1408
a reply to: Krazysh0t
No doubt she will be paraded by some lunatic Right winger at a rally soon enough.

As opposed to be demonized by the left for this person doing what she thought was correct in her reasoning? One person thinks they are female and pee's standing up. One person thinks the other person should be using a different bathroom. Two opposing views. Neither is correct or wrong. Just opposing. If you pick a side, you've already lost.

That's bull# she knows the law as does everyone else in the world thanks to the last 2 weeks.

Weak argument.

So now people need to keep current on the news displayed by the MSM, or else they get arrested for not adhering to these "new laws"? Maybe she can't afford cable, a tv, and the Internet?

Part of being a security guard is to stay up-to-date with the laws and regulations pertaining to when they can detain someone or kick them out of the store. So yes, a security guard, by being a security guard, should be current on new laws.

Ask any judge, ignorance of the law is no excuse to break it.

originally posted by: rollanotherone

originally posted by: MysticPearl
I cannot believe how this whole ridiculous issue has been pushed to the forefront of national discussion.

With everything going on in the world today, both globally and within our borders, this is what the MSM wants to focus on. Well this and whatever Trump has said in the last 24 hours.

Asinine on all fronts. A fabricated issue meant to dumb down the American public and avoid real issues.

Like I said earlier, if you've picked a side, you've already lost. There is no winner in this tranny tourney.

yes there is!!!!!.........let me post this again.....abcnews.go.com...
it's been working in Oregon high schools for the past TWO YEARS!!!!....the "solution" is already being used and is easy to find, if people can get their head out of their own ass.

Security Guard Arrested For Removing Man From Women’s Bathroom

Ya know?

If I was a brick and mortar store owner.

I would close the bathrooms, and tell them to go elsewhere.

EVERYONE.

Problem solved.

There is no LAW that says business's have to have them at all.

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: rollanotherone

Are you seriously suggesting that instead of being tolerant and letting these people pee where they want, they should experience the indignity of wearing adult diapers?

Hey that's being intolerant to diaper wearers.

According to PC liberal logic, that is another hate crime you are propagating. The PC police will not tolerate your intolerance, prepare for a life behind bars with those criminal thoughts.

The guard was arrested because you cant just run arround assaulting anyone you disagree with. Ms. Belcher has clearly considered herself a lady for some time. These bigot laws dont cover the entire nation so there's no reason for anyone to give them any consideration unless they live in a state that hates freedom.

a reply to: rollanotherone

Ignorance of the law is not gonna hold up in court or during arrest.

You're not arguing logically during this discourse.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

Nice try, but wearing an adult diaper is a choice. A choice usually made because of bodily problems. It signifies that your body doesn't work as well as it should and it is damn well embarrassing (especially for a young person) to be wearing one. It's not even CLOSE to an accurate comparison you are making there by trying to be funny as you are.

originally posted by: neo96
Security Guard Arrested For Removing Man From Women’s Bathroom

Ya know?

If I was a brick and mortar store owner.

I would close the bathrooms, and tell them to go elsewhere.

EVERYONE.

Problem solved.

There is no LAW that says business's have to have them at all.

You might want to check first before making statements.

Does A Restaurant Have To Have A Restroom?

Generally, yes―all dine-in restaurants are required to provide customers with a restroom. How and where these restrooms are constructed is heavily regulated, and they are designed to maximize both privacy and sanitation. There are, however, several exceptions to this law, which allow certain businesses to avoid installing a bathroom. www.restaurants.com...-dJhnIU

a reply to: Annee

I Did check there Anne.

THERE IS NO FEDERAL LAW that says business's have to provide restroom ACCESS.

However only 14 out of the '57' states has the RAA which are STATE laws.

Read it and WEEP.

en.wikipedia.org...

As per the TOPIC.

DC ain't one of them.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: Annee

There should be a deterrent to harming anyone not just minorities.

Anyone that can be hated for just being who they are.

I think it was the Irish at one time. Pre-hate law.

a reply to: neo96

is that legal?

I think there are places without public restrooms come to think of it.

I still don't know, is this law on the books in every state?

originally posted by: Krazysh0t
a reply to: TinfoilTP

Nice try, but wearing an adult diaper is a choice. A choice usually made because of bodily problems. It signifies that your body doesn't work as well as it should and it is damn well embarrassing (especially for a young person) to be wearing one. It's not even CLOSE to an accurate comparison you are making there by trying to be funny as you are.

Choosing to change your sex is also a choice. A choice usually made because of bodily problems, the parts don't seem to match the gender. It signifies that your body does not match as it should and it is damn well embarrassing (especially for a young person).

They compare perfectly, evidenced by your exacting standards as you just laid them out.

originally posted by: Deaf Alien
a reply to: rollanotherone

Equal rights is always the clear winner.

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also? How about the rights of FGM believers. How about the rights of white supremacists? You allow one tiny minority, you need to allow all minorities their rights

originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: Annee

I Did check there Anne.

THERE IS NO FEDERAL LAW that says business's have to provide restroom ACCESS.

However only 14 out of the '57' states has the RAA which are STATE laws.

Read it and WEEP.

en.wikipedia.org...

As per the TOPIC.

DC ain't one of them.

Your source is: Wikipedia

My source is: Restaurants.com

More research needed.

Urine. We are arguing about where we put our urine. Does anybody else feel silly?

originally posted by: angeldoll
a reply to: rollanotherone

So now people need to keep current on the news displayed by the MSM, or else they get arrested for not adhering to these "new laws"? Maybe she can't afford cable, a tv, and the Internet?

Like robbing a bank, or running a traffic light, ignorance of the law is not an excuse.

Tell that to the European immigrants who think groping women is "totally how it goes". Yet see no consequences for their actions.

originally posted by: Stormdancer777
a reply to: neo96

is that legal?

I think there are places without public restrooms come to think of it.

I still don't know, is this law on the books in every state?

Only 14 has it right now.

It keeps going we are looking at federal laws.

a reply to: rollanotherone

So, the rights of pedophiles need to be adhered to also?

Ding ding we have a winner! When people are on the losing side in this topic they always resort to pedophilia.

Anyway illegal behaviors are illegal. So do a better analogy next time.

a reply to: TinfoilTP

They only compare because you are selectively choosing aspects of both things and narrowly defining them in a sensationalist way. You know DAMN well that people don't self-identify as adult diaper wearers and don't demand equal protections because they have to wear them (outside of standard disability access laws that apply to all disabilities equally).

fivethirtyeight.com...

I found this

The majority of both active and inactive1 bills (69 percent) stipulated that multiple-occupancy bathrooms be separated according to users’ biological sex, not by their gender identity. However, about a fifth (22 percent) of the measures did not require separation. The bills that fell into the latter category looked to allow businesses, schools and other establishments to have the option to divide bathrooms without facing a nondiscrimination claim.

Most of the bills would require that public school bathrooms, in particular, be separated by sex. Illinois state Rep. Thomas Morrison was the sponsor of one of those school-related bills. He said he wrote his bill in response to a high-profile fight in Illinois in which a transgender student won access to the women’s restrooms and changing rooms in her school. He framed his bill as reactive, saying he wanted to return to what was once the status quo. “I think it’s appropriate to slow down a little bit,” he said. That North Carolina and other states were working on their own legislation, he said, didn’t factor into his decision.

For measures requiring that bathrooms be sex-segregated, the lawmakers needed to decide how, precisely, they would define biological sex. They used a range of definitions, and in two the definition was tautological (“as biologically defined”).2