It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Eilasvaleleyn
a reply to: neo96
GMO food = not bad, but Monsanto = bad.
The ACA is somewhat of a failure, but that's not because "healthcare=bad", it's because "Corporations owning the government=bad."
Churches are also a massive problem.
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Seems a better alternative to the trillions lost in clean up and burial for tens of thousands that starve to death.
I'm not surprised that you would take an opportunity to bash scientific advancement and social programs as a waste of government money
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Gryphon66
I think that's the very definition of selective lol.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
a reply to: neo96
So you're okay with some ludicrous government waste ... just not others.
Gotcha!
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Gryphon66
I think that's the very definition of selective lol.
Seems to be a similar function to "smaller government" ... smaller government until a right winger wants the government in our bedrooms or in our pants or giving special rights to religious groups, or trillions to the military industrial complex etc. etc.
Then, its "America! Patriotism! The Flag!"
/cue National Anthem
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Seems a better alternative to the trillions lost in clean up and burial for tens of thousands that starve to death.
Last time I checked there ain't anyone starving in this country.
www.truthrevolt.org...
Sounds a lot like gluttony.
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Seems a better alternative to the trillions lost in clean up and burial for tens of thousands that starve to death.
Last time I checked there ain't anyone starving in this country.
www.truthrevolt.org...
Sounds a lot like gluttony.
1 in 6 people in America face hunger.
The USDA defines "food insecurity" as the lack of access, at times, to enough food for all household members. In 2011, households with children reported a significantly higher food insecurity rate than households without children: 20.6% vs. 12.2%.
Food insecurity exists in every county in America. In 2013, 17.5 million households were food insecure. More and more people are relying on food banks and pantries. Collect food outside your local supermarket for a local food bank. Sign up for Supermarket Stakeout GL.
49 million Americans struggle to put food on the table.
In the US, hunger isn’t caused by a lack of food, but rather the continued prevalence of poverty.
More than 1 in 5 children is at risk of hunger. Among African-Americans and Latinos, it’s 1 in 3.
Over 20 million children receive free or reduced-price lunch each school day. Less than half of them get breakfast, and only 10% have access to summer meal sites.
For every 100 school lunch programs, there are only 87 breakfast sites and just 36 summer food programs.
1 in 7 people are enrolled in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP). Nearly half of them are children.
40% of food is thrown out in the US every year, or about $165 billion worth. All of this uneaten food could feed 25 million Americans.
These 8 states have statistically higher food insecurity rates than the US national average (14.6%): Arkansas (21.2%), Mississippi (21.1%), Texas (18.0%), Tennessee (17.4%), North Carolina (17.3%), Missouri (16.9%), Georgia (16.6%), Ohio (16.0%).
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: Gryphon66
I think that's the very definition of selective lol.
Seems to be a similar function to "smaller government" ... smaller government until a right winger wants the government in our bedrooms or in our pants or giving special rights to religious groups, or trillions to the military industrial complex etc. etc.
Then, its "America! Patriotism! The Flag!"
/cue National Anthem
You mean until it comes to the evil rich persons wallet or bank account, the gun owners closet, healthcare, and trying to control the entire planet.
Yeah 'liberals' sure want 'smaller government' now don't they?
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Seems a better alternative to the trillions lost in clean up and burial for tens of thousands that starve to death.
Last time I checked there ain't anyone starving in this country.
www.truthrevolt.org...
Sounds a lot like gluttony.
Guess again:
I in 7 Americans faces Hunger Every Day
Millions of Other Examples
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: neo96
originally posted by: Kali74
a reply to: neo96
Seems a better alternative to the trillions lost in clean up and burial for tens of thousands that starve to death.
Last time I checked there ain't anyone starving in this country.
www.truthrevolt.org...
Sounds a lot like gluttony.
Guess again:
I in 7 Americans faces Hunger Every Day
Millions of Other Examples
That is an asbolute farce.
Johnson declared a WAr on poverty over 50 years ago.
And WE have spent over 22 trillion dollars on the longest war in American history.
So there can't be anyone 'starving'.
No, liberals don't lie and cry about "smaller government" ... in general they want government to do its job (national defense, general welfare, infrastructure, etc.) and then stay the hell out of their lives
Healthcare is 'bad' because the US government is the largest single private insurer in the contry between medicare,medicaid, and TRICARE.
That has taken over 120 million+ people out of the private market.
originally posted by: neo96
Corporations don't own the governments.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
Conservatives are the ones who continually whine smaller government right up until they're passing more laws to take more personal freedoms away.
/shrug