It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier
Our elementary school has a pool. All kids learn to swim in PE.
Your not the only parent/school in the USA.
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
Bruce Jenner (aka Caitlyn Jenner) types would be allowed to shower in the girls locker room next to your daughters. He/she still has a penis....and guess why? He/she still desires females. So there will be Bruce types in there with straight girls and they are sexually attracted to those girls. Awkward.
And the Lesbian and bisexual girls in there?
Should they be segregated?
No. Not the same thing. Duh.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: luthier
No there are circumstances that in any other place would be sex abuse and you want to make it OK because it is in a school.
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
Bruce Jenner (aka Caitlyn Jenner) types would be allowed to shower in the girls locker room next to your daughters. He/she still has a penis....and guess why? He/she still desires females. So there will be Bruce types in there with straight girls and they are sexually attracted to those girls. Awkward.
And the Lesbian and bisexual girls in there?
Should they be segregated?
No. Not the same thing. Duh.
So, in your scenario, the girl (who is a biological male) being attracted to the other girls is THE DANGER.
But lesbian and bisexual girls, showering beside the other girls as well, and being attracted to the other girls, is not a danger.
Do I have that right?
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
Bruce Jenner (aka Caitlyn Jenner) types would be allowed to shower in the girls locker room next to your daughters. He/she still has a penis....and guess why? He/she still desires females. So there will be Bruce types in there with straight girls and they are sexually attracted to those girls. Awkward.
And the Lesbian and bisexual girls in there?
Should they be segregated?
No. Not the same thing. Duh.
So, in your scenario, the girl (who is a biological male) being attracted to the other girls is THE DANGER.
But lesbian and bisexual girls, showering beside the other girls as well, and being attracted to the other girls, is not a danger.
Do I have that right?
Do you just play dumb or are you so one-layered that you don't see the differences?
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
originally posted by: Gryphon66
originally posted by: queenofswords
Bruce Jenner (aka Caitlyn Jenner) types would be allowed to shower in the girls locker room next to your daughters. He/she still has a penis....and guess why? He/she still desires females. So there will be Bruce types in there with straight girls and they are sexually attracted to those girls. Awkward.
And the Lesbian and bisexual girls in there?
Should they be segregated?
No. Not the same thing. Duh.
So, in your scenario, the girl (who is a biological male) being attracted to the other girls is THE DANGER.
But lesbian and bisexual girls, showering beside the other girls as well, and being attracted to the other girls, is not a danger.
Do I have that right?
Do you just play dumb or are you so one-layered that you don't see the differences?
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody
Uh the legal system crawls.
I would rather put the kid through that than have him beat by the bullies. Yeah. Can you find a record of abuse by trans kids in locker rooms?
The state is being sued by the federal government as well as corporations moving out (private sector) and loosing it's funding because of the legislature. There pointless temporary stand is going to set the state back billions. It's OK I live in SC. We will gladly take the business.
originally posted by: luthier
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Annee
I posted the entire NC state indecent exposure to a minor law.
In a school same sex naked I.e. a shower is not a crime, opposite sex exposure is a crime. Anyone who aids or abets this will be charged.
Why was this defined as a crime?
Is the exposure any less damaging if it is unintentional?
Why are you pushing to put MINORS in that situation?
These are things that need to be at least discussed in a public forum........hmmm where would that be maybe a school board meeting?
Pushing "morality" through government never works. For either side.
But let go by an apeals court or pardined by the feds. It's not a real law. It's a state law waiting to be shut down by the federal government. Though it looks as though the old free market private enterprise may do it.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Annee
By all means do not address the state law
Our elementary school has a pool. All kids learn to swim in PE.
Your not the only parent/school in the USA.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: Annee
Because you clearly have an agenda
Sorry for MINORS it has to be separate but equal in a locker room.
originally posted by: shooterbrody
originally posted by: luthier
a reply to: shooterbrody
Uh the legal system crawls.
I would rather put the kid through that than have him beat by the bullies. Yeah. Can you find a record of abuse by trans kids in locker rooms?
The state is being sued by the federal government as well as corporations moving out (private sector) and loosing it's funding because of the legislature. There pointless temporary stand is going to set the state back billions. It's OK I live in SC. We will gladly take the business.
Are you darf? The feds are pissed about a bill passed recently
I quoted the existing law for indecent exposure to a minor
Coaches shouldn't let bully's beat kids in the shower