Muslim States Ban LGBT Groups From UN Meeting

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Mine was a joke. Yours was a deliberate attempt to change the subject by incriminating your political opposition through association.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Nice Try. How is this an Anti-Trump thread?

Tell PayPal!

I'm sue they will react here just like they did in North Carolina........not.

a reply to: NthOther

I didn't bring up conservatives I just followed on from you and another member to continue that line of thinking.

Forgive me for not getting you humour.

a reply to: Profusion

So I'm guessing their backward, ignorant bigoted selves can't be voted down? For a subject as important as AIDS, a world wide health issue, you'd think that representation of ALL humanity would not just be welcomed, but demanded! What if the UN started investigating child abuse, pedophilia in the Islamic/muslim world, subjugation of women and FGM and people of the civilized countries wanted to deny their participation?

a reply to: IAMTAT

I never called this an anti-Trump thread, IAMTAT...

Maybe read my post again with your comprehension glasses on.


Remember context.


Now this is derailment and I'll play no part in that.
Back to Muslims states rejecting LGBT.


Disgusting.
Sincerely, a Muslim.

Salam.

a reply to: Hazardous1408

Just about every anti Trump thread becomes a Hillary bash fest.

Edit: IAMTAT right on time to bring up Hillary.

www.abovetopsecret.com...

Hillary took $100 Million from these states and vociferously supports LGBT rights.
Don't you think she should be angry about this too. Shouldn't she refuse to take their cash donations...in protest?

a reply to: Konduit

Hahaha!

a reply to: IAMTAT

If that's the way you want the thread to evolve I'll answer...

Yes she should reject these countries blood money.
Not just because of this event.

But for many reasons.


Then again Hillary is evil, so that wouldn't be SOP for her.

This will become a non-story.

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
-Internet

a reply to: Profusion

Sounds like conservatives and these Muslim states have a lot in common so why pick on them, you should embrace them?

No?

a reply to: gladtobehere

Russia you say? Oh no, conservatives love Putin! This cannot be!

a reply to: Swills
Clinton sure embraces them.

a reply to: Konduit

did anyone ever tell that nut that it takes more muscles to frown then smile. probably one of the finest developed frowns ive ever seen.

a reply to: onequestion yOU, ME AND KONDUIT NEED TO HANG OUT.

a reply to: IAMTAT

Clinton and the rest of DC, and former war criminals Bush and Cheney.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
This will become a non-story.

"To learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize."
-Internet

That sheep has already sailed.

originally posted by: Profusion

A group of 51 states, collectively known as the Organization of Islamic Cooperation, has denied 11 LGBTI organizations access to a high-level meeting at the United Nations. The meeting, which was scheduled for next month, would be discussing the prospects of ending AIDS. The action of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation has sparked protests from United States, Canada and the European Union among other nations.
Muslim States Ban LGBT Groups From UN Meeting

This is something that could wake liberals up to how backward and evil Muslim states are.

'Selling' Children Is a Radical Form of Religion

Liberals seemingly don't care about the children whose lives are ruined because they're legally 'sold.' But, mess with LGBT groups and that could be a major wake-up call.

Or it could be something else to rationalize away and forget about like it never happened.

It's their meeting. They can ban whoever they want.

a reply to: Profusion

This is something that could wake liberals up to how backward and evil Muslim states are.

Because liberals are well known for defending Islamic states? Gee. It seems like half the time I post about politics, I'm trying to stop our religious conservatives from turning America into the Christian version of Saudi Arabia. Theocracies are inherently right-wing.

I support the rights of Christians too but again, I don't support Christian theocracies. Do you support them?

I imagine the answer to that question is "no" and yet, nobody is asking you how you can reconcile that non-existent conflict.

originally posted by: MysticPearl
I've always found one of the biggest contradictions in the leftist and liberal support of Mooslims to be that the Mooslims are one of, if not the most hateful, bigoted, divisive, groups out there.

Says the teenager (I assume) calling them mooslims instead of muslims.

Well done mate