It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye
The DNC may play the role of "enemy" to the GOP, but the party is nothing more than a party of "Lite-Republicans". They don't advocate for socialist programs. Obamacare is proof. Obamacare was a handout to insurance companies.
They couldn't care less about a socialist candidate and we can see that in the way they are handling their nomination process.
originally posted by: neo96
a reply to: MotherMayEye
don't think the DNC would pass up the chance at the first avowed socialist president either.
Oh they STILL get that too.
CLinton is the trifecta of what they want.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz, DNC chair, can’t name differences between Democrats, socialists
And I think HIllary's email investigation exists purely to benefit Bernie and make it happen.
Hillary's email investigation would have been long buried if she was The Chosen One.
Bernie can pave the way for democrats and republicans to reap huge profits from his spending plan. It isn't about 'socialism' so much as it is about profiting from a huge domestic spending plan. There's no need for a conservative warmonger now that the War on Terror has been declared. It's amoney-making scheme that will never end.
I still say democrats and republicans secretly adore Bernie's big spending plan and they will manipulate this election to ensure he wins.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye
And I think HIllary's email investigation exists purely to benefit Bernie and make it happen.
Or the JD/FBI want to be honest in their duty.
Hillary's email investigation would have been long buried if she was The Chosen One.
Again, or the people in charge want to be honest in their duty.
Bernie can pave the way for democrats and republicans to reap huge profits from his spending plan. It isn't about 'socialism' so much as it is about profiting from a huge domestic spending plan. There's no need for a conservative warmonger now that the War on Terror has been declared. It's amoney-making scheme that will never end.
Bernie has to content with a Republican-controlled congress, if it remains as it is. Are the Republicans going to play ball with Bernie?
I doubt it.
I still say democrats and republicans secretly adore Bernie's big spending plan and they will manipulate this election to ensure he wins.
Let's deal with facts, not conspiracy. Even a good conspiracy has some fact behind it. Your conspiracy does not.
LOL. I've been alive long enough to know that the federal government can not be trusted to be honest. They have never earned the benefit of the doubt.
ETA: And, BTW...you know nothing about "my conspiracy theory." I am confident I am correct in "my conspiracy theory" because I spent years writing open records requests that led me here. You just have my conclusions, but you haven't zero grasp of what really goes on in the U.S. government.
Besides, it's obvious that both democrats and republicans love to spend, waste, misappropriate, and steal U.S. tax dollars. ALL of the evidence says I am right about that.
"The government could have easily swept the Hillary email issue under the rug to benefit Bernie, but hey didn't. They followed-through on their obligations."
"How do you know what I do and what I know? Your assertion is based on assumptions."
What? This doesn't even make sense. How does it benefit Bernie to have Hillary's baggage buried?
Because you've never ASKED me on what I base "my conspiracy theory." And I've never shared it with you.
originally posted by: introvert
No need. Based on what we know and can verify, your conspiracy theory is crap.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: introvert
If it was buried, it would be BURIED and not up for discussion. Just like the example I used: Larry Sinclair's unlawful imprisonment.
The name "Larry Sinclair" is blackballed from major news forums TO THIS DAY.
Read what I said again, Mother.
The current course of action is playing in to Hillary's hands.
They forced the Republicans to make fools of themselves, as they did with Benghazi, and forced Sanders to come out and defend Hillary and her email problems.
Sweeping this issue under the rug would have fed the Republicans and helped Bernie.
originally posted by: MotherMayEye
a reply to: introvert
Read what I said again, Mother.
The current course of action is playing in to Hillary's hands.
They forced the Republicans to make fools of themselves, as they did with Benghazi, and forced Sanders to come out and defend Hillary and her email problems.
Sweeping this issue under the rug would have fed the Republicans and helped Bernie.
Oh, you're ridiculous.
This email investigation has been an ANCHOR on Hillary's campaign. Republicans, conservatives, independents, Bernie supporters...they've all seized on it to show how Hillary is not fit to be president.
Bernie will come out of this primary looking like a true, lovable, grassroots underdog that never had to sling mud thanks to Hillary's email investigation that's always in the headlines. It SERVES his image as a gosh-darn stand-up guy to NOT sling mud on the issue.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye
Bernie will come out of this primary looking like a true, lovable, grassroots underdog that never had to sling mud thanks to Hillary's email investigation that's always in the headlines. It SERVES his image as a gosh-darn stand-up guy to NOT sling mud on the issue.
But it's not going to get him the nomination.
You are proving exactly what I have said.
Bernie is being "Ron Paul'ed" and people are too blind to see what is happening.
The GOP helped them do it due to their blind ignorance.
originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: MotherMayEye
You express your doubt.
That's all is needed.
Mr. Lukens, a former ambassador to Senegal, was the leadoff witness in the Judicial Watch depositions. He served as executive director of the State Department’s executive secretariat under Mrs. Clinton until 2011, providing her with logistical, administrative and travel support. Judicial Watch said it was seeking his testimony because records that have already been released indicated that he had emailed Ms. Mills and others about Mrs. Clinton’s private email server.
Thomas Fitton, the president of Judicial Watch, who took part in Mr. Lukens’s deposition, said afterward that he could not discuss the substance of the testimony because of the ground rules set by Judge Sullivan.
But Mr. Fitton predicted that once the testimony is publicly released — perhaps as early as next week — it would show “why the State Department and Mrs. Clinton have slow-rolled this and withheld a complete explanation of what went on with her email system. What we learned is going to be embarrassing to Mrs. Clinton and the administration — maybe more than embarrassing.”