It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
With all the transgender posts going on at the moment, I decided to google "was Jesus transgender?"
I was surprised at how many results turned up!
My favourite (Link ) basically says that Jesus, being son of God, had no gender before conception. God also has no gender. Therefore, Jesus must be transgender.
But is transgender really the right word? Would Jesus actually have been agender? (That means without gender)
But if he was agender, why would he be depicted as a male? That means that transgender would fit Jesus better than being agender.
What are your thoughts?
originally posted by: WhiteWingedMonolith
originally posted by: TerryDon79
With all the transgender posts going on at the moment, I decided to google "was Jesus transgender?"
I was surprised at how many results turned up!
My favourite (Link ) basically says that Jesus, being son of God, had no gender before conception. God also has no gender. Therefore, Jesus must be transgender.
But is transgender really the right word? Would Jesus actually have been agender? (That means without gender)
But if he was agender, why would he be depicted as a male? That means that transgender would fit Jesus better than being agender.
What are your thoughts?
Neither shall they say, Lo here! or, lo there! for, behold, the kingdom of God is within you. Luke 17-21
originally posted by: ketsuko
No more than Jesus was a socialist.
Form of a man, yes. But does that mean he was a man? His chromosomes would actually prove him being female as there would be no Y chromosome (from a male)
originally posted by: FamCore
a reply to: TerryDon79
My thoughts are that Jesus was God, "in the flesh, in the form of man", so I don't think Jesus would be classified as transgener or agender.
I don't know if I believe the book about that, but that's a different subject.
I thought he may have had children with Mary Magdalene as well? That whole conspiracy from Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code?
originally posted by: Misterlondon
Lol.. I've seen some thread titles here before that make me shake my head before clicking..
I think your has to be up there in the top 10..
originally posted by: JoshuaCox
originally posted by: ketsuko
No more than Jesus was a socialist.
Jesus was definately a socialist...
Give up to ceaser what is ceaser's (pay your taxes)
The sermon on the mount where he fed all the people.
When he glorified the widow who put pennies in the plate over the people who put more..
The transgender part is an insane stretch, but he fits socialism pretty freaking well...
Except for the verse where he says "And God said let the free market set all prices, an tho shall not sign up for Obama care."
Lol
originally posted by: TerryDon79
His chromosomes would actually prove him being female as there would be no Y chromosome (from a male)
originally posted by: Agartha
originally posted by: TerryDon79
His chromosomes would actually prove him being female as there would be no Y chromosome (from a male)
Excellent point! His mother was XX + immaculate conception which means no male chromosomes.
If Jesus really existed he could only have been XX = female.
originally posted by: TerryDon79
Unisex latrine?
originally posted by: In4ormant
a reply to: TerryDon79
I'm just laughing. Slow day eh?