It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: KnightFire
Why should they get paid if they are not teaching? I'm sure for some of those teachers, that question is an oxymoron. But seriously, Why should they get paid if they are not in the classroom teaching?
It wouldn't be any different than summer vacation. At least in the state I'm in, most school districts do not pay their teachers during the summer when school is out. Only the administrative staff gets paid.
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: ketsuko
I fet what you are saying but as corny as it sounds the kids who are getting screwed have little to no control over the adults...so they are screwed
originally posted by: Aazadan
a reply to: bigfatfurrytexan
I'm torn on this. On the one hand I agree that the money should come with stipulations, but on the other hand I don't want the federal government to get even more control over what are currently state level problems unless we officially decide to nationalize the sector.
I think that long term that just creates a back door for the state to lose all control without actually putting proper laws in place to give structure to the feds. With the way things are going right now there's going to be a lot of bailouts of a lot of different sectors in the coming years, Michigan, Kansas, and Illinois to name a few all have serious and systemic issues. Texas, California, and Kentucky aren't too far behind.
A Center on Budget and Policy Priorities study released Thursday highlights significant cuts in public education spending since the Great Recession. The data in the report also shows a clear pattern: the states that have made the deepest cuts in public education are dominated by conservative lawmakers who have imposed an ideology of enriching the wealthy through tax breaks even as they starve public schools.
originally posted by: chrismarco
a reply to: ketsuko
I fet what you are saying but as corny as it sounds the kids who are getting screwed have little to no control over the adults...so they are screwed
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: WeRpeons
No, Republicans are not fans of wasting money.
Look. In Kansas the public education system spends an average of $15,000 per year on each student, but in Kansas City, St. Thomas Aquinas, a very fine parochial school with an excellent reputation, does the same thing for about $9,000 per year per student.
How is it that the parochial school does better than the public schools with so much less money?
You see the same pattern more or less repeating in DC with DC Public schools and Sidwell Friends. At one time, there was only about a $3,000 to $4,000 per year difference between what DC had per student and what a person spent to send a kid to Sidwell. You cannot tell me that there was only about that much difference in the quality of education received.
Clearly, money is not the whole issue or the only issue at work in education, but leftists simply continue to shovel more money at it as if that is the answer.
originally posted by: ketsuko
I have to ask ... if the teacher standards were so low, how did they manage to turn out some of the best educated kids?
It seems a contradiction to say that they can accept bargain basement teachers (those with no degrees and those who aren't being paid commensurate with what other teachers are paid) and still turn out kids who are much better educated.
This is part of the private v. public argument that has always bothered me.
After all, if the only difference between what separates a public v. a private kid is what the parents can pay (and having one in a private school myself I can attest to this), then it's a false assumption that only the smartest are in private education meaning they get educated in spite of the teachers. Not all of those kids are the sharpest tools and they still have a better than average chance of getting educated to a higher degree than their public school peers.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: WeRpeons
No, Republicans are not fans of wasting money.
Look. In Kansas the public education system spends an average of $15,000 per year on each student, but in Kansas City, St. Thomas Aquinas, a very fine parochial school with an excellent reputation, does the same thing for about $9,000 per year per student.
How is it that the parochial school does better than the public schools with so much less money?
You see the same pattern more or less repeating in DC with DC Public schools and Sidwell Friends. At one time, there was only about a $3,000 to $4,000 per year difference between what DC had per student and what a person spent to send a kid to Sidwell. You cannot tell me that there was only about that much difference in the quality of education received.
Clearly, money is not the whole issue or the only issue at work in education, but leftists simply continue to shovel more money at it as if that is the answer.
originally posted by: Aazadan
I went to a private Catholic high school.
They did it by lowering teacher standards and paying them less. They accepted teachers who didn't have degrees, and in return paid the faculty less across the board.
originally posted by: xuenchen
Interesting.
Can you show details and anything that supports the claims?
Not doubting, just inquiring.
originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Aazadan
Not all private schools do this, and they STILL have better outcomes.
My son isn't going to be tested every year as he goes up through the program, but I'll bet he gets a much better education than most of the kids in the city outside of some of the other private preps.
The difference is that private schools do have some measure of control over their curriculum and over their discipline. Since they aren't public they can decide to not accept or remove the child the child who simply refuses to behave and whose parents make no attempt to correct the situation. However, since they are also beholden on the parents for their livelihood, it's not like they don't do their best to work it out, either. Tuition is a lot of money.