CIA director says unverified material in secret 9/11 pages

Now we have the current CIA Director John Brennan saying the mysterious "28 page report" that may soon be released in part, contains "uncorroborated" and "unvetted" information and therefore the Saudi connection(s) may not be true !!!

Brennan said on the NBC TV show Meet the Press.

Geesh, now what will people think?

I don't know enough to comment or speculate any further.

What is this latest claim all about?


CIA director says unverified material in secret 9/11 pages

CIA Director John Brennan says a 28-page secret chapter from a congressional inquiry into 9/11 contains preliminary information about possible Saudi links to the attackers that hadn't been corroborated or checked out at the time.

The Obama administration may soon release part of the material.

Brennan tells NBC's "Meet the Press" there were "concerns about sensitive source of methods, investigative actions" and notes the Sept. 11 investigation still was underway.

originally posted by: xuenchen
Now we have the current CIA Director John Brennan saying the mysterious "28 page report" that may soon be released in part, contains "uncorroborated" and "unvetted" information and therefore the Saudi connection(s) may not be true !!!

Brennan said on the NBC TV show Meet the Press.

Geesh, now what will people think?

I don't know enough to comment or speculate any further.

What is this latest claim all about?


CIA director says unverified material in secret 9/11 pages

CIA Director John Brennan says a 28-page secret chapter from a congressional inquiry into 9/11 contains preliminary information about possible Saudi links to the attackers that hadn't been corroborated or checked out at the time.

The Obama administration may soon release part of the material.

Brennan tells NBC's "Meet the Press" there were "concerns about sensitive source of methods, investigative actions" and notes the Sept. 11 investigation still was underway.

That still doesn't answer why planeloads of Saudis were shipped out of the US when the air curfew was in force, and at least one american address had a connection to the hi-jackers or organiser/s.

originally posted by: smurfy
That still doesn't answer why planeloads of Saudis were shipped out of the US when the air curfew was in force, and at least one american address had a connection to the hi-jackers or organiser/s.

Hell ... I can answer that for you. It's 'cause the Saudis did it ... and 'they' know it.

If these 28 pages are wrong ... what does that say about the rest of the report?

I think we all here at ATS know the answer to that.

S&Fs for everyone!!

a reply to: xuenchen

…the mysterious "28 page report" that may soon be released in part…

Lots of luck. They'll never tell the truth. These 28 pages of 'secrets' are just another dodge to refocus peoples attention. As if everyone doesn't already know the truth but are led away from what they've learned by this 'new' as yet un released information.

A year and a half from now they'll (finally) release some blacked out pages with a few sentences of stuff already in the public realm. By then you will have forgotten about your desire to know the secrets anyway.

Onto the next hidden, classified, unreleased, secret memo, server, email.

Holy crap. Could it get any more obvious? He literally says releasing the pages would be a mistake because they contain information people could use as ammunition tieing Saudi Arabia to the 9/11 attacks. Are you effing kidding me?

Basically, the 28 pages tie Saudi Arabia to the attacks and they dont want that because they contain 'uncorroborated' information. Well gee wiz. I guess it is a good thing that they verified the information used to tie Iraq to the attacks before we invaded them. Oh wait! What a joke this is.

Read the comments section on this article -www.msn.com...

Literally the entirety of the US public, including the masses from Facebook, can see through this charade. All of us knew this crap already. And yet nothing will be done, by anybody.

The 19 hijackers were pretty much all Saudi Arabian. What ties need to 'be made?' It is in their blood and money. No connections need to be made when the damn people who did it were admittedly all Saudi.

I sure am so glad we invaded Iraq to get revenge on those Saudi bastards. And then Afghanistan. Makes perfect sense!

Whats next? Invade Japan after Kim fires another missile?

The CIA has done a good job in trying to coverup the 911 crime. This trend is continuing by throwing more doubt, uncertainty and confusion.

The real criminals behind 911 are a lot closer to home. If America really wanted to stop 911 then I am sure it would of.

Gary Webb says hello.

originally posted by: CheckPointCharlie
Gary Webb says hello.

No he did NOT!!

Gary Webb shot himself in the head ... twice. And that's Official.

a reply to: xuenchen

It's just those who know the truth using the CIA as a means to take steam out of any validity this will open up. It won't work but they gotta create some sort of defense for it just the same.

originally posted by: Snarl
If these 28 pages are wrong ... what does that say about the rest of the report?

Yes, Mr Brennan seems to want to play the very old reverse psychology role that you didn't fall for.
So according to him, the 9/11 commission done and dusted it all, and that the redacted pages are more or less useless addenda. The fact (1) is, a joint statement from members of the commission was made in 2012, asking for the 28 pages be released,

'Kean and Hamilton, along with the other members of their 9/11 Commission, also called this week for making public much of the classified documents related to their own commission’s investigation. The 9/11 Commission members’ follow-up report published last week states:
As we noted in The 9/11 Commission Report, complexity and over-classification produced an intelligence apparatus that in many respects “defie[d] public comprehension.” The report was valuable to the American people in large part because it included a tremendous amount of previously classified information—information about the 9/11 plot, the al Qaeda conspirators, and counterterrorism policy and actions in the Clinton and Bush administrations. The job of fully informing the American people is incomplete, however. The commission’s records, including summaries of our interviews and important intelligence and policy documents, are held by the National Archives. Some of those documents and records remain classified and are thus unavailable to the public. Authority to declassify those documents rests with the agencies that created them. Distressingly, little progress has been made by the National Archives and Records Administration (NARA) in encouraging the relevant executive branch agencies to declassify those records and documents. Ten years after the Commission closed its doors, scholars and the general public should be given broad access to these documents, absent a compelling national security justification for withholding a given record.'
Fact (2) is, Mr Brennan, is a part, albeit an aging part, of that blocking bureaucracy. He does other throwaway stuff like that quote of his in the link,
""Absolutely, I would not agree to having any CIA officer carrying out waterboarding again," said CIA Director John Brennan, pictured in February 2016...
Well he's not likely to anyway is he?
So anyway, back to 9/11 itself, members of that commission complained about what they were being given in the time the commission was ongoing, as not not being the truth or the whole gamut needed to do their job, when they say that, it renders the commission itself pretty moot, never mind another 28 pages of redacted supposed mootness.
All I can say is, thanks Mr Brennan for being so nice about intimating the thickheadedness of those not in your commune. Hmmm, he'll probably get a gong for that.
Now, seeing as I am English, there are those around here who would like to think that I am anti-American, or something like that, just because I would question much and more about 9/11...I am not, there are also those around here who would say Americans who question 9/11 are also anti-American...that's just stupid and blinkered.
We will know the right way of things someday.

a reply to: xuenchen

He should correct himself and make that statement about every aspect of the official story!

Priceless coming from the agency that organized that horrific day!

There are so many flaws in the official US Government’s position on 9/11
that it is sometimes difficult to know just where to start. For example,
the miraculous survival of a passport, used to identify one of the
hijackers, which somehow worked its way through the aircraft’s impact,
explosion, fire, and an 800-plus foot free-fall to be found by a
well-dressed man and given to a New York City police detective at the
base of the twin towers is a standout. The superstar-like ability of
named pilots to go from the controls of a single-engine propeller-driven
light plane to the cockpit of a passenger airliner and do anything
except put it into the ground within a minute of turning off the
autopilot is another – who would ever have thought that the Microsoft
Flight Simulator program was so superlative? And the explanations given
for the multiple failures of NORAD (the North American Air Defense
Command) to have fighters on all four planes within minutes of their
straying off course are individually dubious and collectively
preposterous – only in Hollywood would they have any credence, perhaps
because that is where they originated.

Read this again...only in Hollywood...and so many died...and now trump?
Really...bring back Happy Days.
Cheers

Can the secret pages help to answer these questions???

Okay thеn..9/11 – Thе Basic Qυеѕtіοnѕ

1. Whу didn’t jets intercept thе airliners ѕіnсе thеу hаԁ
numerous warnings οf terrorist attacks?

2. Whу ԁіԁ Ashcroft ѕtοр flying commercial airlines, citing аn
unidentified “threat” іn July 2001?

3. Whу ԁіԁ FEMA lie аbουt thеіr presence іn Nеw York οn
9/11?

4. Whу didn’t thе Secret Service hustle Dubya out οf thе
classroom?

5. Whу ԁіԁ George H.W. Bush meet bin Laden’s brother οn 9/11?

6. Whу ԁіԁ passengers οr crewmembers οn three οf thе flights
аƖƖ υѕе thе term boxcutters?

7. Whеrе аrе thе flight recorders?

8. Whу wеrе thе FISA warrants discontinued?

9. Hοw ԁіԁ Bush see thе first plane crash οn live camera?

10 Whу wаѕ security meeting scheduled fοr 9/11 cancelled bу WTC
management οn 9/10?

11. Hοw ԁіԁ thеу come up wіth thе “culprits” ѕο quickly?

12. Hοw ԁіԁ thеу find thе terrorist’s cars аt thе airports
ѕο quickly?

13. Whу ԁіԁ Shrub dissolve thе Bin Laden Task Force?

14. Whу thе ѕtrаnɡе pattern οf debris frοm Flight 93?
15. Hοw extensive wаѕ thе relationship between thе Taliban, thе
ISI аnԁ thе CIA?

16. Whаt exactly wаѕ thе role οf Henry Kissinger аt UNOCAL?

17. Whеn wаѕ іt ԁесіԁеԁ tο cancel building a pipeline frοm
Turkmenistan through Afghanistan tο Pakistan?

18. Whу ԁіԁ thе FBI іn 1996 close thе files tο investigate Osama
bin Laden’s relatives іn Washington?

19. Whу ԁіԁ .Bush ѕtοр inquiries іntο terrorist connections οf
thе Bin Laden family іn early 2001?

20. Whο mаԁе thе ԁесіѕіοn tο hаνе John O’Neill ѕtοр
investigating Al-qeada accounts?

21. Whο gave thе ԁесіѕіοn tο give hіm a security job аt thе
World Trade Center?

22. Dіԁ John O’Neill meet anyone οf thе FEMA іn thе night οf
September 10th?

23. Whаt аbουt media reports thаt hijackers bουɡht tickets fοr
flights scheduled аftеr Sept. 11?
24. Whу ԁіԁ none οf thе 19 hijackers appear οn thе passenger
lists?

25. Whу wουƖԁ devout Muslims frequent bars, drink alcoholic
beverages аnԁ leave thеіr bibles?

26. Whу wουƖԁ thе hijackers υѕе credit cards аnԁ allow
drivers licenses wіth photos tο bе zeroxed?

27. Whу ԁіԁ thе hijackers force passengers tο call relatives?

28. Hοw ԁіԁ thе hijackers change thе flight рƖаn without law
enforcement οr thе military try tο ѕtοр thеm?

29. Hοw ԁіԁ a hijackers passport miraculously appear near thе WTC?
Whο found іt аnԁ whаt time?

30. Hοw сουƖԁ thе FBI distinguish between “regular” Muslims
аnԁ hijacker Muslims οn those flights?

31. Whу wаѕ thеrе nοt one “innocent” Muslim οn board аnу
οf thеѕе flights?

32. Dіԁ someone ɡο through thе passenger lists looking fοr Muslim
names аnԁ ƖаbеƖ thеm аѕ hijackers?

Best аnѕwеr:

Any ATSer want to answer these questions? I think not.
Cheers

a reply to: JaMeDoIt

The superstar-like ability of
named pilots to go from the controls of a single-engine propeller-driven
light plane to the cockpit of a passenger airliner and do anything
except put it into the ground within a minute of turning off the
autopilot is another – who would ever have thought that the Microsoft
Flight Simulator program was so superlative?

You are so misinformed it's sad.
THEY WERE CERTIFIED AS TWIN ENGINE COMMERCIAL PILOTS.
THEY HAD REAL COMMERCIAL SIMULATOR TIME ON 737 AND 757.

But go ahead and believe in all this conspiracy stuff.

a reply to: JaMeDoIt

1. Whу didn’t jets intercept thе airliners ѕіnсе thеу hаԁ
numerous warnings οf terrorist attacks?

2. Whу ԁіԁ Ashcroft ѕtοр flying commercial airlines, citing аn
unidentified “threat” іn July 2001?

3. Whу ԁіԁ FEMA lie аbουt thеіr presence іn Nеw York οn
9/11?

4. Whу didn’t thе Secret Service hustle Dubya out οf thе
classroom?

5. Whу ԁіԁ George H.W. Bush meet bin Laden’s brother οn 9/11?

6. Whу ԁіԁ passengers οr crewmembers οn three οf thе flights
аƖƖ υѕе thе term boxcutters?

7. Whеrе аrе thе flight recorders?

8. Whу wеrе thе FISA warrants discontinued?

Try to answer few of the questions - no that expect "truthers" to accept any facts not in accord with their conspiracy
fantasy......

1 Jets Intercepted - there were only 14 aircraft on alert in 7 bases. 2 F15 were launched from Otis airbase on Cape Cod
at same time American 11 was striking North Tower . Jets were holding offshore when United 175 hit South Tower
Time lag between when FAA determined plane was hijacked then passed information meant the fighters were not in position to intercept, Even if intercepted what do you ??? Shoot it down over Manhattan . Warning of terrorist attacks?
Guess referring to August 6 briefing where reference made that Bin Laden was planning possible hijacks. To have any
chance of intercept would have to know time and location of flight. There are 4000 airline flights each day - without specifics searching in a very big haystack.........

4 - Why didnt hustle president out of school? Because was in a secured location, unless expect some 2nd grader
pull out AK47 and start blasting.. Would wait until had more information on situation before moving.

6 Boxcutters is term used by media. FBI describes them as utility knives, Here is list of some of the knives FBI
was able to track to hijackers Prior to 9/11 FAA allowed people to carry them on aircraft

www.historycommons.org...

7 Flight recorders - The flight Data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) - On American 11 and United 175
flight recorders were destroyed by impact and subsequent collapse of WTC On American 77 (Pentagon) both recorders
were recovered Data of flight recorder was readable. Cockpit voice recorder was damaged and unreadable
Both recorders from United 93 (Shanksville) were recovered and readable

8 FISA warrants - Fisa warrants are national security warrants issued by special federal court in Washington tasked to
hear classified information. There was a squabble between local office in Minnesota which wanted warrant to search
Moussaoui laptop and FBI HQ which didnt want to go to the court because had had been frequently been using these
warrants and though might get turned down if went too often It was a bureaucratic hassle between local office
who believed had cause to search Mossaoui and HQ

a reply to: xuenchen

Brennan tells NBC's "Meet the Press" there were "concerns about sensitive source of methods, investigative actions" and notes the Sept. 11 investigation still was underway.

Sounds like damage control to me. Stating the fact that it was still under investigation.

So, after 15 years and the so call 911 investigation, what did the government find? This question hasn't been answered yet.

originally posted by: Informer1958
a reply to: xuenchen

Brennan tells NBC's "Meet the Press" there were "concerns about sensitive source of methods, investigative actions" and notes the Sept. 11 investigation still was underway.

Sounds like damage control to me. Stating the fact that it was still under investigation.

So, after 15 years and the so call 911 investigation, what did the government find? This question hasn't been answered yet.

I truly feel that what the government "found" was that after nearly 15 years the masses haven't forgotten and disregarded the 9/11 bullsh*t circus.

I think they originally felt there wouldn't be as much enthusiasm for a true investigation in 2016.

"It's a frame"

Back peddling.

They know this document is getting closer to being released so they are getting their excuses ready.

If this were true then they would have said so when it was first classified that they could not verify the sources and as such had removed it from the report pending further investigation or something.

Anyone who believes is either delusional or bought off...which one?
Cheersa reply to: samkent