Hillarys Classified Email Problem... a closer look

Mods move in if wrong thread....

I truly believe that this needs it's own thread as it has significant additional information.


Too much is focused on Hillary sometimes and people tend to forget the scope of the actual problem. This is not just about Hillary, but it also involves deeply those around her in her inner circle.

This is for people who wish to do their own research, or simply need to to squash a pro hillerite.

All information is attained through the State Department virtual reading room.

The following people, Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Jacob Sullivan all emailed Hillary Clinton classified information to her unclassified email server from their state.gov accounts. Mills also used a secondary private email account.

Sidney Blumenthal was a Clinton Foundation employee with no US security clearance. Patrick Kennedy only has 1 email....





right click above image for larger clearer picture

raw data below if you want to copy and paste:


# Sent Class Reason DATE
C05780110 8-Mar-11 C 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 MILLS, CHERYL
C05782907 11-Oct-11 C 1.4(D) 9/30/2005 MILLS, CHERYL
C05780602 12-Mar-11 S 1.4C 1/29/2016 MILLS, CHERYL
C05782906 11-Oct-11 C 1.4(D) 9/30/2005 MILLS, CHERYL
C05764490 06-Sep-09 C 1.4(D) 7/30/2015 MILLS, CHERYL

C05764642 20-Sep-09 C 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 10/30/2015 SULLIVAN, JACOB
C05785530 16-May-11 C 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 SULLIVAN, JACOB
C05782235 24-Aug-11 S 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 SULLIVAN, JACOB
C05789767 25-Mar-12 S 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 SULLIVAN, JACOB
C05791291 25-Feb-12 S 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 SULLIVAN, JACOB

C05790513 10-Mar-12 C 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 ABEDIN, HUMA
C05770452 15-May-10 C 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 ABEDIN, HUMA
C05768129 5-Apr-10 C 1.4(G) 1/29/2016 ABEDIN, HUMA
C05764564 27-Aug-09 C 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 ABEDIN, HUMA
C05782599 9-Sep-11 C 1.4(D) 2/29/2016 ABEDIN, HUMA

C05762494 6/23/2009 C 1.4(D) 2/29/2016 BLUMNETHAL, SIDNEY
C05766147 9/24/2009 C 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 BLUMNETHAL, SIDNEY
C05768686 4/24/2010 S 1.4(D) 12/31/2015 BLUMNETHAL, SIDNEY
C05779465 6/21/2011 C 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 BLUMNETHAL, SIDNEY
C05764341 10/8/2009 C 1.4(D) 1/29/2016 BLUMNETHAL, SIDNEY


C05791603 27-Jul-12 C 1.4(B) 1.4(D) 11/30/2015 KENNEDY, PATRICK


These are only the first 5 hits for Mills, Abedin, Sullivan,,,, all three have a whole lot more classified emails... Sullivan appears to be the worst...a lot of his are Secret.

The Irony of it all is... Bryan Pagliano turns up only 1 hit and that is insignificant, unlike the larger role he is about to play.


for an explanation of codes used for classification and FOIA releases, please go here:

www.abovetopsecret.com...

a reply to: RickinVa

S&F

Thanks for a well thought out and researched thread, anyone that thinks Hilley did no wrong, needs their head examined!

Go FBI!

I wonder which of these aides will cut a deal first?

BETTER YET...Which will Crooked Hillary The Troll Queen throw under the bus first?

a reply to: RickinVa

There are quite a few charges there.
Whats the hold up on the indictment?

originally posted by: shooterbrody
a reply to: RickinVa

There are quite a few charges there.
Whats the hold up on the indictment?

Good question,,, but when you look at the amount of people that are involved, it doesn't surprise me that it has taken them this long... that is a lot of stuff to sort though... I only used the first 5 hits for Mills,Abedin and Sullivan.

I don't care how long they take, as long as they snag em all when the time comes to pay the piper.

Is it just me or does it seem the only excuse Hillary has is she never read her emails to not know they contained classified information?

I used to classify naval messages based on technical details, navigational data, exercise messages, sensitive information about personnel, etc. This all happened just a couple years after receiving my clearance. We had required reading to ensure we followed all the proper procedures to prevent compromising data or transmitting over improper channels.

Now this is all at lower levels of classification. When dealing with SCI it's like a smack in the face to hear someone running for President didn't realize the implications of that data. I honestly think she either has no common sense, had no care for her position, or is blatantly trying to get people killed. That is the reality of this type of information when it's classified at that level. She isn't qualified to be President in my eyes.

a reply to: RickinVa

in conversations with Mr. Spad, it seems the logical step at this point, would be for her clearance to be removed. Since that isn't happening, this is likely going to be an open white wash for all to see. then you can tell your grand kids about how you witnessed the fall of our civilization first hand. Those with special privileges are above the law.

originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: RickinVa

in conversations with Mr. Spad, it seems the logical step at this point, would be for her clearance to be removed. Since that isn't happening, this is likely going to be an open white wash for all to see. then you can tell your grand kids about how you witnessed the fall of our civilization first hand. Those with special privileges are above the law.

That's exactly what is happening here. People with different status getting different treatment. I don't know if she belongs in jail, but running for a position with possibly the highest clearance you can get seems absurd.

a reply to: network dude

Maybe Hillary's clearance has already been removed?

Perhaps it has not been made public yet.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: network dude

Maybe Hillary's clearance has already been removed?

Perhaps it has not been made public yet.

For the sake of national security...I sure hope so.

originally posted by: IAMTAT

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: network dude

Maybe Hillary's clearance has already been removed?

Perhaps it has not been made public yet.

For the sake of national security...I sure hope so.

If I remember correctly, the FBI requested some months back that specific individuals not be read off of their clearances so they could be questioned about the classified stuff without it being censored.

a reply to: eisegesis

I read everthing in the news on HRC's email snafu, the only claim I've seen for her innocence is from her, her campaign and the DNC's Debbie Wasserman Schultz.

Wasserman Schultz: Hillary emailed like other Secretaries of State (except for the private server part)

Wallace pointed out the FBI had dozens of agents that had investigated the issue for months, adding Director James Comey revealed the probe could potentially go past this summer’s Democratic Convention.

“Are you saying it’s all a waste of time?” Wallace asked.

“I’m not commenting on it one way or the other, other than to say—” Schultz started.

“Wait a minute, you have. You said it’s ludicrous,” Wallace said.

Schultz said Clinton had used private email “in the same way that previous secretaries of state have done.”

“You know that’s not true,” Wallace said. “Nobody says that’s true.”

“Other than the private server,” Schultz said.

source

a reply to: AlaskanDad

Schultz is wrong. As we learned in another thread, Clinton is not the first government official to use a private server for official government business.

originally posted by: introvert
a reply to: AlaskanDad

Schultz is wrong. As we learned in another thread, Clinton is not the first government official to use a private server for official government business.

Nobody learned that in the other thread.... you were proven wrong there, just like you are wrong here.


Hillary Clinton is the first and only government official to use a personal privately owned server. Other people have used commerical email accounts or party servers such as the DNC or RNC servers. NO one has ever used their own personal email server.


To say otherwise is nothing but a lie and you damn well know it. You may not know the difference between a private server and personal private server, but everyone else does... including the head of the DNC when she got corrected after trying to say the exact same crap you just did.

You can spout your server crap all day long... how bout we talk about the classified emails listed above that were emailed to Hillary unclassified email server... that is a lot more fun to talk about.

a reply to: introvert

She's not the first to use a personal email account, but she is the first to set up a private server in her home.

a reply to: introvert

Maybe you should read what she said:

Wasserman Schultz: Hillary emailed like other Secretaries of State (except for the private server part)

Did other Secretary of States use private email server?

Nothing about other Government officials was mentioned, also not all Government officials handle as highly classified documents as the SOS does!

a reply to: RickinVa

It is correct that Hillary is the first to have a personal email server, but she is not the first to use a private server outside of government control.

Other people have used commerical email accounts or party servers such as the DNC or RNC servers. NO one has ever used their own personal email server.

Still out of government control and a violation of the security measures put in place, correct? Schultz is still incorrect.

To say other wise is nothing but a lie and you damn well know it. You may not know the difference between a private server and personal private server, but everyone else does... including the head of the DNC when she got corrected after trying to say the exact same crap you just did.

Please show we where in the security protocols it differentiates from personal private and private server.

originally posted by: queenofswords
a reply to: introvert

She's not the first to use a personal email account, but she is the first to set up a private server in her home.

In her home, yes. But she is not the first to use a private server outside of government control.

a reply to: RickinVa

Thanks for keeping the Troll Queen's minions honest, Sir. Rick.