It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Swills
If the RNC isn't going to give Trump the nomination then they are definitely not giving Cruz the nomination. Both Trump and Cruz lose to either Democratic candidate while Kasich is the only one who does somewhat well. Besides Clinton, Trump and Cruz are hated by majority of the American public and the RNC.
So if the RNC wants a shot at winning Kasich is their man. Either way, corrupted politics is corrupted politics.
Face it, when you openly supported Trump you just supported a loser. He will never be president.
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: introvert
A candidate who has been in single digits for the majority of the election is the only one that can win?
A poll told me so... so it must be true!
originally posted by: MrWendal
What I find so amusing to many of the responses here on this topic is the absolute hypocrisy shown by so many people.
This idea of racking up delegates, ignoring the "wins" in the States, and taking the fight to the convention floor where delegates can "vote their conscience" is not new. We have all seen it before, but I never heard a single person mention "ignoring the will of the voters" when it was happening last time.
This was the campaign strategy of Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012- and had plenty of support from many members here. It was not considered under handed or crooked. It was viewed as working within the system and using the rules of an already screwed up system to your advantage.
Not anymore. Now that this same strategy is being used by people many of us simply do not agree with, now it is "ignoring the will of the voters".
This whole thing is a sham. The process is a joke. Your vote means NOTHING. This whole thing is like choosing what's for dinner. On one side you can have a ham and dog crap sandwich. On the other side you have a roast beef and dog crap sandwich. No matter which one you choose, you're still eating sh*t.
It amazes me that people do not understand that the real change they seek starts at the local level of Politics and moves up. Not the President. It starts with your City Council. Moves to your Mayor. Police Chiefs. Sheriffs. District Attorneys. Governors. Congress people, Senators.
Think about this for a moment. No matter who you believe in- Clinton, Sanders, Trump, Cruz etc etc- just how much do you think they can get accomplished if Congress does not go along? Or the Senate does not go along? How many "laws" and "executive orders" have we seen ignored by bills passed on local levels and signed by Governors during this Administration alone? Granted, not many of us complained about the way Common Core has been tossed out at the State level in many places - but did you not realize that lays out a plan for how the establishment can do the same with issues you would agree with if by some impossible odds we managed to get a President who actually cared about the average person and not the big money special interest?
originally posted by: Nucleardoom
originally posted by: Konduit
a reply to: introvert
A candidate who has been in single digits for the majority of the election is the only one that can win?
A poll told me so... so it must be true!
EXACTLY! How does one garner, at best, 20% of the republican voter base, but yet when we include all voters he has magically gained over 30 percentage points and is the best chance at beating Clinton. Yea, and if you believe that I've got some oceanfront property in Arizona you might be interested in purchasing. Total MSM propaganda bulls***.
originally posted by: MrWendal
What I find so amusing to many of the responses here on this topic is the absolute hypocrisy shown by so many people.
This idea of racking up delegates, ignoring the "wins" in the States, and taking the fight to the convention floor where delegates can "vote their conscience" is not new. We have all seen it before, but I never heard a single person mention "ignoring the will of the voters" when it was happening last time.
This was the campaign strategy of Ron Paul in 2008 and 2012- and had plenty of support from many members here. It was not considered under handed or crooked. It was viewed as working within the system and using the rules of an already screwed up system to your advantage.
Not anymore. Now that this same strategy is being used by people many of us simply do not agree with, now it is "ignoring the will of the voters".
This whole thing is a sham. The process is a joke. Your vote means NOTHING. This whole thing is like choosing what's for dinner. On one side you can have a ham and dog crap sandwich. On the other side you have a roast beef and dog crap sandwich. No matter which one you choose, you're still eating sh*t.
It amazes me that people do not understand that the real change they seek starts at the local level of Politics and moves up. Not the President. It starts with your City Council. Moves to your Mayor. Police Chiefs. Sheriffs. District Attorneys. Governors. Congress people, Senators.
Think about this for a moment. No matter who you believe in- Clinton, Sanders, Trump, Cruz etc etc- just how much do you think they can get accomplished if Congress does not go along? Or the Senate does not go along? How many "laws" and "executive orders" have we seen ignored by bills passed on local levels and signed by Governors during this Administration alone? Granted, not many of us complained about the way Common Core has been tossed out at the State level in many places - but did you not realize that lays out a plan for how the establishment can do the same with issues you would agree with if by some impossible odds we managed to get a President who actually cared about the average person and not the big money special interest?
originally posted by: onequestion
a reply to: Swills
The polls must be lying because the voting says pyherwise .
Millions of people support Trump.
Dare I say tens of millions?
That's what the votes say.
It's because of the way the questions are asked in the polls. They ask people if it was a head to head match against Clinton and Kasich, whom would they vote for. I'm really surprised that so many people don't understand such an elementary concept. We did similar projects in Junior High.
so just shy of 10 million votes another member had claimed
In total, Trump has received 8,776,586 votes so far this year in states that have already held primaries or caucuses or conventions. In those same states in 2012, Romney received 6,654,029 votes—a whopping 2,122,557 votes less than Donald Trump. That means Trump has gotten a 31.79 percent increase over Romney’s totals. Meanwhile, Cruz, in states that have voted already in 2016 has received an impressive 6,452,032 votes. While admirable, that’s still 201,977 votes less than Romney’s 2012 totals in those states—a decrease of 3.04 percent from Romney’s 2012 votes. The analysis shows that of the nearly 40 contests so far, Trump’s 2016 vote totals have demolished Romney’s 2012 vote totals in most places.
So if the RNC wants a shot at winning Kasich is their man. Either way, corrupted politics is corrupted politics
i predict a sweep for trump and death blow to sanders from clinton in todays primaries (april 26th)
originally posted by: RalagaNarHallas
a reply to: Gazrok
trump won every county in every state he ran in today cruz and kasich alliance failed and the voters said no to those two bastards choosing the candidate