It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Thats because they were on a points ignition system..
originally posted by: trollz
a reply to: Profusion
I was about to point this out. I'm pretty sure that 438 nuclear reactors going into meltdown around the world would cause humanity to go extinct.
No. It isn't. But geomagnetism can produce electricity when it fluctuates across long conductors.
Thanks for bouncing it back to the OP but geomagnetics is electricity
1859? Which vehicles would that be?
and yes the vehicles were on points at the time of this event occuring.
Nothing personal and I haven't been gone.
But thanks for the attention sweet cheeks ive missed you.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: butcherguy
No.
The wiring is not long enough to produce currents of any significance. Hundreds of miles of wire, yes. 15 feet of wire, not.
Shielded or not, is irrelevant. It is the fluctuation of the magnetic field across the wire which induces the current.
The fluctuation of the current across the magnetic field will change that dramatically.
I'm not sure how many scientists write textbooks but I do know that textbooks change with just about every edition.
I look forward to all the scientists rewriting textbooks,
I wonder how often this type of event happens?
However, there is circumstantial evidence in the form of radioisotope distributions that very strong events like the Carrington occur one or twice in a thousand years.
What evidence do you think would be valid for risk assessment purposes?
This circumstantial evidence has no value for the risk assessment.
originally posted by: BigBrotherDarkness
a reply to: Phage
Wormstrom, Im glad to see your self certianty principle is still in effect... if you need attention to feed that ego try the favorite member thread.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: ParasuvO
The fluctuation of the current across the magnetic field will change that dramatically.
Which current? What would it change?
I'm not sure how many scientists write textbooks but I do know that textbooks change with just about every edition.
I look forward to all the scientists rewriting textbooks,
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: 727Sky
Most species on Earth and many human settlements do not rely on electricity. A modern-time Carrington event would be a game-changer, sure, but it would most certainly not bring extinction.
originally posted by: Misterlondon
originally posted by: swanne
a reply to: 727Sky
Most species on Earth and many human settlements do not rely on electricity. A modern-time Carrington event would be a game-changer, sure, but it would most certainly not bring extinction.
It would be the end of the world for many without their iPhone or Facebook..
originally posted by: butcherguy
Not so long ago a vehicle with a diesel engine would have been immune to the effects of a Carrington Event. Today's diesel engines have a whole lot of controls that allow them to function. These controls would be fried if we get a real solar blast.
originally posted by: VoidHawk
The fear about nuclear power stations being frazzled, is very unlikely. Over here in the uk they know what to do when such an event is expected, they throw open the breakers all over the grid, thereby reducing the length of the conductors to a safe level.
originally posted by: fleabit
438 nuclear reactors will go on meltdown 'cause we are turning off all your power. Good luck with that!
originally posted by: Junkheap
I'm guessing the first thing we would have noticed would be the Satellite on the television going out just before all the lights go out, the computer power supply exploding from the power surge and then all the power lines in my city catching fire and that would just be the beginning.