It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Tindalos2013
a reply to: jeep3r
a reply to: jeep3r
One explanation about ancient engineering that I have heard about is that some sort of chemical was used to soften the stone.
Fawcett relates that at first he dismissed it as a "tall tale", then after hearing further accounts, as a "popular tradition" but eventually he heard another story that convinced him of the existance of this plant that can soften rock. This later story involved a man wearing spurs who, having lost his horse, was forced to walk some distance and passed through thick bush to find on the other side that his spurs had been eaten away. On discussing the matter, this man was informed that what had eaten his spurs away was the wide patch of growth of a certain plant "about a foot high, with dark reddish leaves" that he had passed through. He was told "... That's the stuff the Incas used for shaping stones. The juice will soften rock up till it's like paste. ..."
The plant that softens stone
originally posted by: Snarl
a reply to: Byrd
Well ... you didn't apply the phrase "Settled Science" ... but I can wait. LOL
If everything was as 'Egyptologists' claim ... why were there any 'discoveries' made at Giza? Why was entrance forced?
Every historical statement about megalithic structures is 'made up'.
People were duped by the scientific community way back when
originally posted by: Halfswede
I think this is the general problem with the study of ancient cultures (lack of engineers and other specialized experts involved with theorizing what happened) . I have seen this evidence before and believe many to be machine tool marks. That said, it doesn't mean they were electric powered or alien technology, just machines (spinning abrasive discs, saws etc.).
The Machu Pichu stonework however is of another kind in my opinion. Not machined. Something lost to modern man.
If people looked at our tools after a thousand years, they would think we didn't have steel tools since it would all be rusted away.
15:20
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Alien Abduct
What do you mean by "incremental grooves?" Where does that appear in the video?
what material would the wire be made from? How would they cut inside right angles?
originally posted by: pauljs75
I'm not thinking they used a bladed saw because of the drag and material considerations...
But if you look at how those treadwheel cranes were made in medieval times, replace the lines working the counterweights with a set or two of continous wheel pulleys that speed up the ratio. The last pulley loop can then have it's cable embedded with an abrasive or working with a prepared slurry in a wet process for the same purpose.
Basically I suspect it's very possible to have a somewhat effective wire saw (similar to that in modern masonry) built with fairly primitive bronze-age level technology.
Alternately a much simpler wiresaw could be implemented with a man pulling on each end.
But if an abrasive powder had been used with soft copper saws and drills, it is highly probable that pieces of abrasive would have been forced into the metal, where they might have remained for some time, and any such accidental and temporary teeth would have produced the same effect as intentional and permanent ones.
With a chisel.
How would they cut inside right angles?
what was the chisel made from to chisel granite?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Thanks.
But if an abrasive powder had been used with soft copper saws and drills, it is highly probable that pieces of abrasive would have been forced into the metal, where they might have remained for some time, and any such accidental and temporary teeth would have produced the same effect as intentional and permanent ones.
source
With a chisel.
How would they cut inside right angles?
Have any advanced tools been found?
Does any of the tools found have "abrasive powder" or perhaps diamond bits embedded in them?
originally posted by: Alien Abduct
what was the chisel made from to chisel granite?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Thanks.
But if an abrasive powder had been used with soft copper saws and drills, it is highly probable that pieces of abrasive would have been forced into the metal, where they might have remained for some time, and any such accidental and temporary teeth would have produced the same effect as intentional and permanent ones.
source
With a chisel.
How would they cut inside right angles?
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Alien Abduct
Have any advanced tools been found?
Does any of the tools found have "abrasive powder" or perhaps diamond bits embedded in them?
No. But that doesnt answer my question.
originally posted by: Phage
a reply to: Alien Abduct
No. But that doesnt answer my question.
Ok. To answer your question, I don't know.
But since you answered mine to the negative, why do you assume advanced tools were used since none have been found?