The Narrative Hillary Agrees With "Gun Owners Are Terrorists"

This is Madness.....
Now I am not big on guns, I don't own one nor will I ever own one, but we have this thing called the Second Amendment which allows people that want to; to buy and own guns as a constitutional right. And not be labeled a terrorist just for owning guns.
This word is thrown about to much these days, just to demonize different groups. So stupid.



And there Hillary is nodding her head in agreement with statements that are very asinine.

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Well that's not what the lady said. She said, "The gun and ammunition manufacturers are making terrorists out of our citizens.", while Hillary nodded. Not that all "gun owners are terrorists".

That's not to say that I agree, but it's not what your hyperbolic title says. But, all terrorists ARE gun owners.

There is no doubt that Americans are being terrorized by their own citizens, what with all these shooting and threats.

a reply to: windword
So, her Security Team/Bills Security Team as an x-pres are all unarmed; outfitted with Christmas toys: a child's Squirt or Cap gun (maybe a very scary Johnny Seven).

a reply to: Blue_Jay33

The problem with Hilary and all of the candidates is all they do is talk about taking away our rights. Whether it is our gun rights or abortion rights or marriage equality or religious freedom these candidates ALL suck.

I will vote for the candidate that supports the rights of all of us and that is why I am a Libertarian. Libertarians are pro-liberty and support all of the above rights.

We need to stop fighting over who's rights should be taken away and start supporting the candidates that support keeping our rights and giving us more.

Hillary is a terrorist. She just accuses everyone else to deflect the facts

a reply to: windword

I'm more threatened by the US government than I am by any fellow citizen.

Does anyone know what is behind Hillary's obsession with Anti Gun stuff lately???

Why I ask is because she's not just being typical Democrat Level Anti Gun but has gone full throttle, no brakes insane including wanting to allow people to sue the manufactures of Weapons for what other people do with them.

We all know she's normally going to pander to whatever gets her voted in so a little anti gun talk is expected but not to this level and it can't be helping her campaign doing so. So why is she doing it??

Who or what has paid her or influenced her to go full retard on this issue all of a sudden?? Because I can't imagine her choosing to risk some extra votes right now when she's going for Pres. Seems like a big risk that could easily be avoided until a different time when it wouldn't impact her so much.

originally posted by: windword
But, all terrorists ARE gun owners.

Uh, not one Goddamned life was taken by a terrorist on 9/11 using a firearm... FAIL

This is very very scary. Your next President openly nodding in agreement that a large percentage of the population are terrorists. Lock and barricade your doors, you may be getting a knock on it some time in 2017...

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: windword
But, all terrorists ARE gun owners.

Uh, not one Goddamned life was taken by a terrorist on 9/11 using a firearm...

FAIL

Are you sure of that?

Besides, I never said that "All terrorist use guns for their terrorist activities". I'm well aware of the threat of bombs and biological weapons.

But, are you saying. for certain, that the 911 terrorist didn't own guns?

a reply to: mOjOm

To be honest, she probably bought stock in gun manufacturers.

It's what I plan on doing if she's crowned.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

To be honest, she probably bought stock in gun manufacturers.

It's what I plan on doing if she's crowned.

You mean because it has the opposite effect whenever they go after guns and sales actually go up???

That might be a good idea actually.

Unless of course she really does start shutting them down and letting them get sued. Something like that could actually bankrupt a industry pretty quick in settlements.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Blue_Jay33



There is no doubt that Americans are being terrorized by their own citizens, what with all these shooting and threats.

Really - not much different to countries without guns.

If you haven't seen this video, I'd encourage you to watch it.

originally posted by: mOjOm
Who or what has paid her or influenced her to go full retard on this issue all of a sudden??

Both side of the 'establishment'. It's muted on the Conservative's side, but if you listen closely ... it's unmistakeable.

Hillary is the only establishment pol taking money into both fists. She's got to be there when the big plays have to be nodded at. Doesn't matter to TPTB whether she gets elected or not ... only that the message comes across lima charlie. The 2d Amendment is bad and it's gotta go!!

Seriously ... anyone who wants to eff with the Bill of Rights is committing an act of treason ... and they know it. That's why they're mostly careful to let someone else bring up the topic and deliver the message ... while they just agree with the sentiment or add some supportive opinion. I am of the opinion that any change to the Bill of Rights should un-unite the states. The agreement to add those first ten amendments was the only thing that saved the union back in the day.

a reply to: UKTruth

I was under the impression that Brussels had some pretty strict gun laws. So did Paris.

originally posted by: windword

originally posted by: burdman30ott6

originally posted by: windword
But, all terrorists ARE gun owners.

Uh, not one Goddamned life was taken by a terrorist on 9/11 using a firearm...

FAIL

Are you sure of that?

Besides, I never said that "All terrorist use guns for their terrorist activities". I'm well aware of the threat of bombs and biological weapons.

But, are you saying. for certain, that the 911 terrorist didn't own guns?

If they didn't use them to commit their crime, does it matter? What if we took it a step further and said "All terrorists on 9/11 were Muslims." "There is no doubt that Americans are being terrorized by Muslims, what with all these fatwahs and attacks."

And they didn't use bombs or biological threats on 9/11, they used box cutters. Effing box cutters. Available for less than $15 at any office supply store before 9/11, available for less than $15 at any office supply store today. There is no Constitutional protection for box cutter ownership, and some days I'm fairly certain the lack of it in the Constitution is exactly the reason Hillary and her allegiance of fascists haven't called for confiscation, registration, and restriction of box cutters. IT DOESN'T SELL STRIFE, FEAR, OR CONTROVERSY... all of which comprise the breast milk of political pandering and whining.

originally posted by: windword
a reply to: Blue_Jay33

Well that's not what the lady said. She said, "The gun and ammunition manufacturers are making terrorists out of our citizens.", while Hillary nodded. Not that all "gun owners are terrorists".

That's not to say that I agree, but it's not what your hyperbolic title says. But, all terrorists ARE gun owners.

There is no doubt that Americans are being terrorized by their own citizens, what with all these shooting and threats.

Agreed, in fact the clip is very short, and could possibly out of context.
The intellectual argument about gun ownership is much deeper than just making guns available for defence, but if you have something like the second amendment, there is no compulsion to dwell on it...unless you want to.
Yet and all, when the Constitution was made it was alright to have a puff just about anywhere...now it's banned.
Of course, I'm sure the written constitution was, by the same token, never intended to be all encompassing for ever.

a reply to: windword

seems pretty irresponsible to say that citizens are terrorists when the American Gov. does its fair of violence to its citizens as well

It makes a good line for when they convince people that they should start suing gun manufacturers and merchants for liability whenever a firearm they either manufactured or sold is used in a crime to cause gun violence.

a reply to: Snarl

That's sorta what I was thinking. So is this possibly the establishments "disarm the people" move that we've heard so much chatter about???

Do you think they're pushing it really hard now because being the establishment is now not quite as safe as it used to be??? Maybe they're thinking they better move things along before it's too late and things go crazy while there are still so many people armed out there that might come after them???

Because it doesn't make sense for her in her position right now to be causing waves like this. Up until now she's been basically hoping to just quietly slither her ass in the drivers seat.