It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
This judge absolutely made the proper ruling.
The judge wrote that his decision on the case would apply to all future cases in which public disclosure is sought of privately created documents not used in a criminal trial that police have seized from innocent victims
For instance the police search your home and take your diary where you list your bank account pin and passwords. The diary is found to have no worth in the charges against you, but now your whole diary is made available to the public.
You think that sounds right?
Dead people don't require privacy, nor do mass murderers deserve it.
It doesn't matter, you do. And if this is public then it would be public if you were alive.
How about a choice rather than being told what is acceptable for the jury or the rest of America to look at? It can't be half as bad than what's on television nowadays.
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: eisegesis
Its about getting all the facts that may conflict with the official story.
The people that think this is all fake will still think that no matter what they produce as evidence. Thats as twisted as the truth is, imo.
Did you figure that out from the official report that was 99% redacted?
Where did you get your evidence?
The Superior Court in New Britain, Connecticut has set a hearing in the Commissioner, DESPEE (Connecticut State Police - "CSP") vs Freedom of Information Commission case. This is the "Dave Altimari/Hartford Courant Adam Lanza documents FOIA appeal.
The Hartford Courant submitted Freedom of Information Requests for 35 documents related to the Sandy Hook shooter. These documents include drawings, the "Big Book of Granny", class photo from Sandy Hook Elementary School from 2002-2004, "Lovebound" a play about a love affair between a 10 year old boy and a 30 year old man, and the infamous "Spreadsheet of Mass Murders".
The FOIA Commission ruled in favor of Altimari; ordering the CSP to release copies of all of the documents.
CSP appealed, arguing that seized evidence is strictly confidential because it is seized evidence in a case and it "might be returned"; although CSP does not dispute they maintain a copy of the records in their files, even if the originals were returned.
Attorney Victor Perpetua, the hearing officer from the recent Halbig hearings, submitted the Commission's legal brief in support of disclosure to Altimari. An impressive read that carries the weight of a sledgehammer. Attorney Perpetua argues the powers of the Commission to decide these matters, the limited over site responsibility of the courts, and the fact that the records are obviously Public Records under Connecticut Law since they are nonexempt records being maintained by a public agency. Perpetua also points out the weak case put forth by CSP; thus CSP cannot now make additional sweeping arguments not originally put forth at the hearing.
As with the Halbig case, CSP Attorney Christine Plourde again stated she never viewed the evidence for which she is the representative. Plourde's nonsense hurt the CSP vs Halbig because had Plourde viewed the videos, she would know that minors are on the videos the FOIA Commission will surely order released. Thus, she missed using a codified exception.
Here, Plourde's failure does not matter so much since we are talking about the shooter; the shooter is not a minor and the shooter should be, figuratively speaking, hung from a hook in town square, for all to see.
originally posted by: intrptr
originally posted by: MALBOSIA
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: eisegesis
Its about getting all the facts that may conflict with the official story.
The people that think this is all fake will still think that no matter what they produce as evidence. Thats as twisted as the truth is, imo.
Did you figure that out from the official report that was 99% redacted?
Where did you get your evidence?
I was right here, watched the whole thing unfold. The real evidence and any intelligent discourse was buried under a ton of debris crying fake this and that.
It was ridiculous. Where were you?
originally posted by: intrptr
a reply to: MALBOSIA
Meh, we're so seemingly concerned with these and other crimes but pay little mind to the mega millions tragedy occurring in the mIddle East that the US government is in large part directly responsible for. Wheres the cry of forensics on that?
Nice distraction they got going here to get us all burying our heads in the sand of these crimes. The real criminals are in Washington carrying out mass murder in foreign lands on a grand scale….
now i get it.
originally posted by: OccamsRazor04
This judge absolutely made the proper ruling.
The judge wrote that his decision on the case would apply to all future cases in which public disclosure is sought of privately created documents not used in a criminal trial that police have seized from innocent victims
For instance the police search your home and take your diary where you list your bank account pin and passwords. The diary is found to have no worth in the charges against you, but now your whole diary is made available to the public.
You think that sounds right?
The Hartford Courant submitted Freedom of Information Requests for 35 documents related to the Sandy Hook shooter. These documents include drawings, the "Big Book of Granny", class photo from Sandy Hook Elementary School from 2002-2004, "Lovebound" a play about a love affair between a 10 year old boy and a 30 year old man, and the infamous "Spreadsheet of Mass Murders".
originally posted by: SeaWorthy
a reply to: eisegesis
All of it is likely fake and placed there. If no one sees it they can claim whatever they like, people are good at finding discrepancies.
To all of those who feel there was nothing fishy in this whole thing I feel you are blind so who cares if you think me a nut.
originally posted by: ChaoticOrder
From my experience it seems like the FBI has much more integrity than the CIA..
originally posted by: intrptr
Mass murder is a rage cult, its members are sick in the head, why give them a fix of twistedness.
Please correct me if I am wrong, but, am I to understand that if "they" release the documents, they are likely fake, so it's a conspiracy.