Hillary Clinton’s Backers Want Obama to Grant a Preemptive Pardon

originally posted by: draoicht
There is also the possibility that Mrs. Clintons Email traffic may be released to the public from Moscow.

It's a long while to Election Day and Uncle Vlad has plenty of time....

Or perhaps he prefers the leverage?

The consequences of an insecure server are unpredictable.

That's why it's illegal.

That is a possibility that many are not thinking about.

And of course, those would be un-censored too.

Very good read here on the idea of a Clinton Pardon
from Obama...coming from experts who analyzed
the interview with Chris Wallace.

Could ‘Deceptive’ Signals from Obama, Clinton On Emails Suggest Possible Pardon?

Our hypothesis regarding a potential pardon assurance was dramatically bolstered on Sunday, when Chris Wallace’s interview of President Obama was aired. What initially struck us in this interview was the way in which the President minimized the seriousness of Clinton’s transgression.

lawnewz.com...

No pardon needed or wanted.

Let her stand on her own and let the chips fall where they may.

a reply to: xuenchen

I suspect the extradition of Guccifer has something to do with that.
There is a chance he has a cache of emails stored in the cloud.
I'm sure the FBI has to get the facts on this, including where and what... and who else might have seen them.
They requested the extradition right after they determined there were classified emails on the server.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Valid point.

I think this Guccifer character is a major bombshell waiting for a fuse.

a reply to: xuenchen

If I was Guccifer, I'd be afraid of being Vince Foster'd.

I would imagine that Uncle Vlad might filter a few out.

We know the Romanian guy was interviewed by the Americans.

Would you seriously believe they were the only people interested?

The First Chief Directorate of the KGB was not a benevolent organisation.

The leverage their successors have in Romania is likely to be considerable.

Obama also said there was "not a smidgen of corruption" in the IRS scandal.

When has he ever been right on something?

"Carelessness" is a wonderful quality for a potus, right?

originally posted by: draoicht
There is also the possibility that Mrs. Clintons Email traffic may be released to the public from Moscow.

It's a long while to Election Day and Uncle Vlad has plenty of time....

Or perhaps he prefers the leverage?

The consequences of an insecure server are unpredictable.

That's why it's illegal.

Golly Gee Whiz, now wouldn't that be a hoot !!!! hahahaha..... But not the leverage type thingy...

a reply to: xuenchen

If she is pardoned, then she was guilty of felony something and then she cannot be POTUS.

I don`t think he can do that, how can he pardon someone for a crime,or crimes, which they havent even been charged with or found guilty of yet? Isn`t that that like giving someone a lifetime pardon for any future crimes they may commit?
legally i don`t think he can do it, and if he can well then we don`t have a president we have a king.

a reply to: xuenchen

A Request for a Preemptive Pardon would be an Admittance of Guilt . The Cockroaches are Scurrying I see .

a reply to: Tardacus

I just had to go and look this up, as I was not sure of it either.

Yet, here it is, looks like a POTUS can pre pardon.

But in Hillary's case, there could be a catch.
Only before she is impeached. So...she cant take office,
then be impeached by "The Vast R Wing Conspiracy"
and still then be pardoned. ( too late then LOL! )

ETA: So she cant take office if she committed a crime,
and she cant be pardoned if she were to be elected
then impeached. This is kind of a catch 22.

Accordingly, the Constitution simply provides that the President ''shall have power to grant reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States, except in cases of impeachment'' (Article II, section 2).
www.nytimes.com...

Will not happen.

a reply to: NewzNose

www.politifact.com...

nope you can run even from jail and even if your a felon we have a felon in congress right now or was as of 2013,qualifications for president are set in the consitution and nothing in it bars felons from running for office or serving in one

Our ruling Nodine claimed that he "can run" for office. As a legal matter, he is correct. The Constitution enshrines the idea that the people get to decide who shall represent them, and the only limits are age, citizenship and residency. In terms of federal law, Nodine can indeed run. His desire to run as a Republican puts him in murkier waters. Political parties enjoy a certain independence. The opinions of the legal experts we reached ranged from thumbs up to thumbs down on Nodine’s chances in court. But even on the more optimistic end, the court battles would be decided long after the election Nodine cares about is over. In the broadest sense, Nodine has the legal right to run for office from jail, but significant barriers lie between that right and his name appearing on the ballot. We rate the statement Mostly True.

www.factcheck.org...

so cant ban them from running ,party leaders can keep your name off the ballot if they want to make a stink but not after primaries have started hell a pedophile could legally be elected to president if enough people voted for him/her

en.wikinews.org... hell a felon got 40percent of the vote in the primaries against obama in 08 in WV

a reply to: xuenchen

Hillary Clinton’s Backers Want Obama to Grant a Preemptive Pardon. For such an approach to be made on her behalf, definitively proves the allegations against her a highly like to be true and correct. This approach to oboma is a dead cert give away shes as guilty as christ.

a reply to: sdcigarpig

If anything, after over 700 days of investigations, this is looking more and more like a witch hunt, and as long as she can prolong it out, it makes the republican party look bad, as it raises questions, that they may not want to answer. And every time they think that they have something, it comes out that they don't and are just wasting time and the taxpayer money.

I didn't realize that the FBI (under the Obama Administration) was a partisan arm of the Republican Party!
Probably because it isn't.

bout 90% sure the 700 days refers to the useless congressional investigation... since the FBI didn't officially confirm the investigation till February of this year.

a reply to: BlueAjah

Hasn't he already tried to block FOIA documents from getting out?

Idk, I might just have to vote for Hilary. I mean it would be the first time that a president was impeached and removed from office. The wails of butt hurt over her removal would be cathartic...I say let's do this.