Houston Film Fest: "Very Threatening Calls" from Government Officials Forcing "Vaxxed" Pulled

a reply to: Farlander

I have five kids, they gave me seven grandkids, none have been vaccinated and all made it through the childhood viruses. We just had a case of mumps. It lasted a couple of days and was less traumatic than a head cold.

I have noticed over the years the milestones that happen when the babies recovered. One of the babies had measles earlier this year and once he had fully recovered his vocabulary jumped a couple of years ahead of his age group. He is in the one millionth percentile. I was caught off guard when I heard that.

Understand all of those wild viruses and how to get them through it safely. A doctor that knows healing is always good to have in your corner.

originally posted by: cooperton

originally posted by: Pardon?

You don't trust the science because to do so will crush your belief system.
That's about the top and bottom of it.

No. People distrust the science because it is supported by a billion dollar industry and research that demonstrates its potential harm is ominously covered up or arbitrarily deemed fraudulent.

You mean like the science that got the rotavirus vaccine, Rotashield recalled after it was seen to potentially lead to a higher risk of intussusception?
You mean THAT science or another one?

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Farlander

I have five kids, they gave me seven grandkids, none have been vaccinated and all made it through the childhood viruses. We just had a case of mumps. It lasted a couple of days and was less traumatic than a head cold.

I have noticed over the years the milestones that happen when the babies recovered. One of the babies had measles earlier this year and once he had fully recovered his vocabulary jumped a couple of years ahead of his age group. He is in the one millionth percentile. I was caught off guard when I heard that.

Understand all of those wild viruses and how to get them through it safely. A doctor that knows healing is always good to have in your corner.

Congratulations to you and your family for making it through.
Did your kids pass on the diseases to anyone else?
How did they fare?
And the ones they passed it on to...

originally posted by: Pardon?

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Farlander

I have five kids, they gave me seven grandkids, none have been vaccinated and all made it through the childhood viruses. We just had a case of mumps. It lasted a couple of days and was less traumatic than a head cold.

I have noticed over the years the milestones that happen when the babies recovered. One of the babies had measles earlier this year and once he had fully recovered his vocabulary jumped a couple of years ahead of his age group. He is in the one millionth percentile. I was caught off guard when I heard that.

Understand all of those wild viruses and how to get them through it safely. A doctor that knows healing is always good to have in your corner.

Congratulations to you and your family for making it through.
Did your kids pass on the diseases to anyone else?
How did they fare?
And the ones they passed it on to...

I just hope they are home schooled and they didn't get to infect others. Vaccines are just a simple way to get an Immune system to fight off an illness. Don't want to get thr measles all they have to do is either weaken thr virus or kill it your body forms white blood cells to remove the forign substance. When it does this tour body continues to produce white blood cells that recognize and destroy the invader. For example when I was a kid I got measles I know have an immunity to it because my body can recognize thr virus and destroy it.


Im not sure how people think vaccines work but it's no diffrent. Only less risk and you don't actually have thr virus cause you to get sick.anyone who doesn't get a vaccine is stupid. Ot protects you from getting sick by destroying the virus as soon as it enters your blood stream. The only bad thing that can occur is certain viruses can do damage and if a vaccine isn't done properly can cause complications. This is why they test them first you don't want to make people sick with a vaccine.

Want to see how not giving your child a vacine can effect others??

www.lifedaily.com...

a reply to: Pardon?

I would think that if folks are vaccinated, they would be protected. We did not share the viruses with anyone else. The adults in the family actually were able to give a boost to our own immunity from each and every exposure. I love how the human immune system works. What I see is that those that don't have the "herd" mentality are actually healthier.

a reply to: dragonridr

There are numerous ways to avoid the secondary infections of any type of skin break. Chickenpox itch really bad. Keep the baby clean and dry and provide relief for the need to scratch. You can see from the photo that the skin is damaged from scratching. That kind of thing can happen with a skinned knee or eczema.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Pardon?

I would think that if folks are vaccinated, they would be protected. We did not share the viruses with anyone else. The adults in the family actually were able to give a boost to our own immunity from each and every exposure. I love how the human immune system works. What I see is that those that don't have the "herd" mentality are actually healthier.

If you still don't understand the concept of herd immunity after watching that video then I really don't know what else to say.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Pardon?

I would think that if folks are vaccinated, they would be protected. We did not share the viruses with anyone else. The adults in the family actually were able to give a boost to our own immunity from each and every exposure. I love how the human immune system works. What I see is that those that don't have the "herd" mentality are actually healthier.

What about those who can't be vaccinated?
What about those whose vaccinations haven't worked?
How do you know you didn't spread the diseases your family had?
Who did your family get the diseases off in the first place?

You do realise that there's a very high probability that you caught the diseases off people who were unvaccinated and that had they been vaccinated you almost likely wouldn't have caught them don't you?
There's a crucial part of herd immunity that you don't seem to be grasping.

Whilst you "love how the immune system works" I don't believe you actually understand HOW it works from even a basic perspective.
And how do you "see is that those that don't have the "herd" mentality are actually healthier"? Please share that one with the rest of us mortals.

a reply to: GetHyped

Double speak, and by a group peddling vaccines. I can only speak from personal experience. Me, my children, and their children have life long immunity that did not require the injection of formaldehyde, aluminum, trace amounts of mercury along with other not so healthy additives. We are healthier for having dealt with the viruses naturally.

a reply to: Witness2008

I like the part where you completely ignore the informative video I posted and instead go off on some irrelevant anecdotal tangent to the point at hand.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: GetHyped

Double speak, and by a group peddling vaccines. I can only speak from personal experience. Me, my children, and their children have life long immunity that did not require the injection of formaldehyde, aluminum, trace amounts of mercury along with other not so healthy additives. We are healthier for having dealt with the viruses naturally.

What you seem to have missed is that to obtain "life long immunity" from these diseases your family HAVE HAD the diseases!
Logic misfire?


So what is your definition of healthier?
How do you quantify that?
What do you measure against?

In short, prove it.



(Just so you know, your own body makes formaldehyde and metabolises it every day and formaldehyde is formaldehyde whether it's made inside your body or from outside it. You ingest and inhale more aluminium per day than you would get if you were to follow the guidelines for US vaccination in a normal human lifetime (ingesting and injecting makes very little difference by the way, physiology 101 anyone?). There is no and has never been mercury in vaccines; I believe you're confusing mercury salts with elemental mercury. Look up the difference, it's big (see aluminium above) Also, ethyl not methyl, again, big difference. Other additives, like most other chemicals & compounds are only unhealthy at certain doses, you may have heard the phrase "the dose makes the poison"? or you may just have ignored that basic tenet of toxicity and formed your own skewed perspective...)

a reply to: Pardon?

What you seem to have missed is that to obtain "life long immunity" from these diseases your family HAVE HAD the diseases! Logic misfire?

Duh....I see that there is a comprehension issue.

I advocate for myself and my family acquiring life long immunity from childhood illnesses through exposure to the wild virus, even if that means actually contracting it. More than half of my experiences were that the illness itself was so mild that it took a really good doctor to diagnose it. We made the trip to see the doctor not because of any help we needed to get the baby through it unscathed, but to verify that the baby actually had the illness.

Dude....it works for me and my family.

Were you aware that some vaccines actually shed? I suspect that is how a couple cases in my family were acquired. Nothing that carries risk, and serious risk for some children, and is not 100% effective should ever be mandated.

a reply to: Pardon?

Forgot to respond to this.....

So what is your definition of healthier? How do you quantify that? What do you measure against?

You know those charts that are found in every pediatricians office? We use that to measure the health and progress of the babies in my family. We also use the standardized testing in the public education arena for intellectual, emotional, and psychological milestones. Imagine that, institutionalized and widely respected standards are proving to me and many others that our children are better off.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Pardon?

What you seem to have missed is that to obtain "life long immunity" from these diseases your family HAVE HAD the diseases! Logic misfire?

Duh....I see that there is a comprehension issue.

I advocate for myself and my family acquiring life long immunity from childhood illnesses through exposure to the wild virus, even if that means actually contracting it. More than half of my experiences were that the illness itself was so mild that it took a really good doctor to diagnose it. We made the trip to see the doctor not because of any help we needed to get the baby through it unscathed, but to verify that the baby actually had the illness.

Dude....it works for me and my family.

Were you aware that some vaccines actually shed? I suspect that is how a couple cases in my family were acquired. Nothing that carries risk, and serious risk for some children, and is not 100% effective should ever be mandated.

Again, I don't know how you've missed the point but you have.
You're not immune to the disease if you can catch it.

Good for you that you and yours came through unscathed, but again, how do you know you haven't propagated these diseases and passed it onto someone who isn't as fortunate as you?
Answer is, you don't.

Yes, I am aware that some vaccines can shed but I'm also aware that what they shed is not the virus itself but an attenuated version (i.e. one which can't cause the illness it's known for). Even the very few vaccinations which use "live" viruses shed in such small numbers as to pose no risk.
So the chance of your being infected by someone shedding a "vaccine" is probably the same as winning the Powerball at the same time as being struck by lightning, virtually impossible. However the chance of you being infected by someone who's not vaccinated is pretty great.

EDIT: "Nothing that carries risk, and serious risk for some children, and is not 100% effective should ever be mandated.
The potential serious risks associated with contracting childhood diseases are far, far greater than the minimal risks from vaccines so by your logic you should be vaccinating your children.
And, since absolutely nothing in this world is or ever will be 100% effective that argument is void and I suspect you will be disappointed in a lot of things...
There also would be no need for mandatory vaccines (I'm certainly not in favour of them) if there weren't so many people opposed to them because they don't understand them due to the misinformation posted by tiny but very loud anti-vax activists.

originally posted by: Witness2008
a reply to: Pardon?

Forgot to respond to this.....

So what is your definition of healthier? How do you quantify that? What do you measure against?

You know those charts that are found in every pediatricians office? We use that to measure the health and progress of the babies in my family. We also use the standardized testing in the public education arena for intellectual, emotional, and psychological milestones. Imagine that, institutionalized and widely respected standards are proving to me and many others that our children are better off.

What charts in paediatricians' offices compare health?
I'd love you to show them to me as I've never seen one and that's after working for 15 years in paediatrics.
However, given your understanding of this subject I would argue that your comprehension and interpretation of milestones especially subjected to your immediate family is biased at best. Especially when you're happy to use "institutionalized and widely respected standards" to measure your snowflakes but dismiss vaccines.
Cherry-picking much?

Why is it so #ing hard for people to understand that people like me and my family AREN'T the latest buzzword 'anti-vaxx', but are pro safe vaccination ingredients and scheduling?! Is this that difficult to comprehend? To want to ensure that what a doctor is injecting into my child has had long term testing for safety?

The current over zealous vaccination schedule and toxic ingredients can cause serious, long term, permanent neurological damage in some children. I've seen it happen to 2 sets of friend's children. Both children were developing normally, and on the regular CDC vaccination schedule. After a vaccination session, both suffered from encephalitis that same day (a side effect that is listed in the health warnings for both DTAP and MMR) and were never the same again; both developed autism and have hardly any communication with the outside world. These families will be taking care of these children as children for the rest of their lives. This has happened to tens of thousands of children in the US.

The AAP, CDC, FDA, and the pharmaceutical companies know the truth and have been covering it up for decades. That's why in 1986 Reagan passed a law for his corporate friends giving pharmaceutical corporations immunity from responsibility from vaccine related deaths and injuries.

The evolution of a thread on ats is remarkable.

By page 4, its seldom about the OP.

People just reply the first thing a topic reminds them of, then things slowly drift to inanity. And thus comes the youtube vids with 'proofs' to refute anything.

originally posted by: X88B88
Why is it so #ing hard for people to understand that people like me and my family AREN'T the latest buzzword 'anti-vaxx', but are pro safe vaccination ingredients and scheduling?! Is this that difficult to comprehend? To want to ensure that what a doctor is injecting into my child has had long term testing for safety?

The current over zealous vaccination schedule and toxic ingredients can cause serious, long term, permanent neurological damage in some children. I've seen it happen to 2 sets of friend's children. Both children were developing normally, and on the regular CDC vaccination schedule. After a vaccination session, both suffered from encephalitis that same day (a side effect that is listed in the health warnings for both DTAP and MMR) and were never the same again; both developed autism and have hardly any communication with the outside world. These families will be taking care of these children as children for the rest of their lives. This has happened to tens of thousands of children in the US.

The AAP, CDC, FDA, and the pharmaceutical companies know the truth and have been covering it up for decades. That's why in 1986 Reagan passed a law for his corporate friends giving pharmaceutical corporations immunity from responsibility from vaccine related deaths and injuries.

Encephalitis has been documented very rarely post vaccine (the current figures are lower than a one in a million risk) so for you to have 2 sets of friends whose children it's happened to is quite remarkable.
And for both of those children to "develop autism" afterwards is even more remarkable.
To put in context, encephalitis post measles or mumps is over a thousand times more common than post vax and bizarrely I've never heard of a single one of these cases of post infectious encephalitis leading to a diagnosis of autism.

The above makes me think one of two things:
1. You're very mistaken
2. You're deliberately lying.

I'll go with number 2.

a reply to: Pardon?

Regardless of what you choose to believe, reality happens anyway.

Encephalitis has actually been documented to be common post vaccination, as well as the subsequent cases of neurological injuries.

So you're either:
1. Very ignorant regarding the subject of vaccination injuries and the their cover-up.

or..

2. A pharmaceutical shill/astroturfer.

The safe bet there is to go with a combination of the two.

You probably don't care to educate yourself regarding the subject, but here's a link where you can start, should you choose to:
therefusers.com...