It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.


Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.


Hillary Clinton says she isn’t sure Bernie Sanders is a Democrat

page: 3
<< 1  2   >>

log in


posted on Apr, 6 2016 @ 11:12 PM

originally posted by: Gryphon66

originally posted by: ketsuko
a reply to: Gryphon66

So he's an independent. So what. So am I, but you and I both know I am actually more conservo-libertarian and if I were running for president that would put me on the Republican ticket.

Similarly, Bernie is a socialist; stop denying it. He certainly doesn't.

At least he's honest about it.

Did you read the title and OP?

The thread is carping about Hillary's statement of fact ... Sanders is NOT a Democrat.

As to "denying he's a socialist" are you confused or otherwise compromised???

I stated, above, twice that is he is a Socialist ... really Kets ... READ.

Well, considering hillary and debbie WS can't tell the difference between a dem and a socialist,

what difference does it make!!

posted on Apr, 6 2016 @ 11:21 PM
a reply to: burgerbuddy

what difference does it make!!

$173 Million Dollars???


Actually I'd say I don't think Hillary knows what a Democrat is. Considering her and Boehner are best of friends and party affiliation probably only comes up when they are sitting in a lobbyist funded backroom at an exclusive restaurant most of the public doesn't even know exist cracking jokes about their most recent lies... errr... campaign promises.

posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 12:30 AM
What does being a "real Democrat" mean? What does being a "real Republican" mean for that matter? Both parties seem to fight among themselves almost as much as they do against one another. Is the argument really that to be a valid candidate for a given party, said candidate must exist in perfect harmonious lockstep with a monolithic whole, and any aberration from that consensus should be met with suspicion?

Both parties might wish they were all that on the same page but... I just don't see it personally. And it's a little disturbing to begin with that not only do we really only de facto have two viable political parties for all practical intents and purposes, but each of them also apparently seek to enforce loyalty to a rigid ideology lest outliers risk de-legitimization.

(For the record, I have no party. And I know there are alternatives. But to said alternatives I say - good luck with that.)


posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 04:48 AM

posted on Apr, 7 2016 @ 11:34 PM

originally posted by: Subaeruginosa

originally posted by: xuenchen
Hillary thinks Bush wrecked the economy.

Bush did wreck the economy.

The US economy was strong and stable when Bill Clinton was president, then Bush came in and totally destabilized it, then obviously Obama stabilized it again... that's just documented fact.

What was the GDP when Bush took office? What was it when the housing bubble crashed? Democrats are responsible for the housing market crash.

posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 10:05 PM

posted on Jun, 9 2016 @ 10:17 PM
He's a Hillary supporter as of today.

Once a Democrat always a Democrat.

new topics

top topics

<< 1  2   >>

log in