It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: dawnstar
a reply to: Annee
that's my point!! he/she would be walking into that restroom with you!!
and this is not just as alarming as men who appear to men but identify as being women walking into that bathroom?
it's a stupid law!
originally posted by: SisterDelirium
Does anyone else find it morbidly amusing, that while the world's human population edges ever closer to the abyss with wars and terrorism, corruption, the potential for new plagues thanks to antibiotic resistance, pollution wrecks our atmosphere, animals go extinct en masse, etc....and our politicians seem to be one flavor of bat-guano or another....
That everyone's so blasted busy staring at their genitalia and trying to figure out what to do about it?
How did we become a culture so fascinated by our nether-regions?
The world has the potential to go to hell in a hand-basket at any moment. The doomsday clock is 3 minutes to midnight....
And we're talking about hoo-haws and ding-dongs like the fate of the free world hangs on a big gay erection.
WTF
originally posted by: SisterDelirium
And we're talking about hoo-haws and ding-dongs like the fate of the free world hangs on a big gay erection.
WTF
the Mississippi legislature recently passed House Bill 1523, the “Protecting Freedom of Conscience From Government Discrimination Act.” With tortured language that would make George Orwell cringe, the bill allows business and government to deny services based on “sincerely held religious beliefs.” Private businesses and faith-based organizations, if Governor Phil Bryant signs the bill into law, could refuse to serve members of the LGBT community. County clerks could deny them marriage licenses. All in the name of something strangely called religious freedom.
originally posted by: SisterDelirium
a reply to: Willtell
The whole point seems moot. It's not really enforceable, anyway. The whole thing is childish. The SC politicians, Intel's response, the whole thing is buffoonery squared.
As for old time religion vs modernity... did anyone ever think that maybe change for the sake of change isn't always a good thing?
There seems to be this element that wants to basically reinvent the wheel with regard to human behavior. Our ancestors weren't all backwards idiots. If people toss out the wisdom of those "old time religions" along with the, admittedly, backward parts, they'll be doing themselves a disservice.
Tradition isn't always good, but neither is change. There's good and bad in either. Unthinking tradition being replaced by unthinking change just seems like more of the same: people doing rather than thinking.