It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Dark Ghost
I guess all you can do is...laugh?
. I grow weary of minorities being offended at every opportunity they can.
Whether marketed as an exercise class or a way to connect with your spiritual self, the commodification of yoga in a way that is entirely dismissive or ignorant of its roots or connections to an existing religion is appropriation at its worst. Bhaktha puts it simply in his artist statement: "The act of selectively choosing what works in popular Western contexts, while ignoring aspects of yoga's core philosophy and historic practice is telling. It shows an ironic attachment of one's ego to a desire for ownership over an ancient practice of material denouncement that emerged from an altogether different, South Asian tradition."
It's about questioning whether your practice of yoga is claiming space away from people of colour to whom yoga is more than a part of their daily routine
Everything in the human experience is subject to a sliding scale. You don't have to agree with where I draw the line on this particular issue, but character assassination is a little much, wouldn't you say?
So? Why does population size matter? Isn't cultural appropriation still cultural appropriation?" "Maybe, but I think there's a gradient, and I think it's n= the number of people you're going to piss off by cherrypicking and warping parts of their religion so that your clients can get that warm-fuzzy mystic vibe."
as opposed to the millions upon millions of contemporary Hindus
Nice to see your ethical values are based on a sliding scale
Character assassination is an attempt to tarnish a person's reputation. It may involve exaggeration, misleading half-truths, or manipulation of facts to present an untrue picture of the targeted person
It's from India.
It's over 5000 years old.
It was practiced by guys.
In some sects, you could only practice if you were a Brahman, a renuciate, or a young male.
Women were not allowed to practice yoga until the early 1900's and even then many were discouraged from doing active postures.
originally posted by: TheConstruKctionofLight
a reply to: Spookytraction
Everything in the human experience is subject to a sliding scale. You don't have to agree with where I draw the line on this particular issue, but character assassination is a little much, wouldn't you say?
Again your words speak for themselves - you rationalized your thinking to your boyfriend using the strength of numbers; you already were invested having studied Hindu culture since the age of 12. In your way of thinking size does matter - as "you studied the culture"
So its all about not offending, the greater number must have the higher ground, at the same time there can be no higher ground because you wander off into moral equivocation -
I suppose you also asked the millions as to whether they were offended by you use of "namaste"
based on your logic and words I said, "Nice to see your ethical values are based on a sliding scale."
How does pointing out your inconsistency amount to a character assassination?
Do you defend other religions iconography or symbolism with such fervour? When at the age of 8 or 9 we saw in school how cows were sacred in India and we thought it was funny how people were starving and yet cows were not to be slaughtered. We know better now and we wouldn't bring up the subject to a Hindu.