Bernie Sanders: 'I think we know who ISIS is'.... ?Really Bernie?

a reply to: neo96

And I suppose the wars in the Middle East brought to us by Bush and friends have all been total victories?

a reply to: Swills

How on earth is Bernie dead set against the elites, the wealthy businessmen, corporations, gov's, etc? Because he says so? Because he wants to tax them higher?

Bernie is willing to let Congress spend $18 trillion without any real oversight or accountability. Recovery.org's failures are a testament to that prediction. Congress will put that money directly in the hands of the "elites, the wealthy businessmen, corporations..."

Bigger taxes on the wealthy (and everyone) just means a bigger, more powerful federal government. And the federal government is nothing but an advocate for the "elites, the wealthy businessmen, corporations..."

Forget what these parties and candidates are selling. The facts say there is the MOST profit to be made under a Bernie administration.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: CosmicSmack

Globalism? So socialism equals globalism? You know, the conspiracy about the NWO, you know Globalism, all stems from the elites, the wealthy businessmen, corporations, gov'ts, and families that Bernie is dead set against. That's why they don't like him. If there's any candidate that is anti Globalism its Sanders.

Who do you support? A fellow elite with a big mouth?

Everything you stand for, is being used against you by those who support your cause.

Those who you are against, are those who are supporting your version of anarchy.

Do you think George Soros gives a damn about equality and a living wage?

You might want to do some research on the countries that Uncle George has brought to it's knees. You also might want to check out what Uncle George described as the "Happiest Time of My Life".

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: MotherMayEye

Omg, you mean he became a Democrat to run for President? You don't say?

He recognizes the democratic party is a complete shame and he would like to revitalize it so it concentrates on the people, not wealthy donors.

But how long has he been an Independent? All those years don't count because he became a dem is 2015 so he could have a shot at the oval office?

That all said, if Sanders doesn't win big in the upcoming primaries and Trump is somehow denied his nomination wouldn't it just be hilarious to see Trump and Sanders continue on as Independents? Oh the drama that would ensue! The race has been ridiculous already thanks to Trump so they both may as well go all out and make that happen!

lol at your spin.

Bernie is a registered democrat.

You want to have your cake and eat it, too.

You want Bernie to have all this *ahem* benefit from running as a democrat, but you realize there is no benefit from identifying with that crap, corrupt party so you want to pretend he is an independent.

Sorry. He is a democrat. It's a fact. I don't care what he was last week, last year, or ever. Today he says he is a democrat.

originally posted by: Swills
a reply to: neo96

And I suppose the wars in the Middle East brought to us by Bush and friends have all been total victories?

Yeah 'Blame Bush!!!!

THESE people 'didn't' have nothing to do with anything 'what so ever ' !




directorblue.blogspot.com...

en.wikipedia.org...

I really love people that think middle east history, and terrorism began in 2000.

Iraq had been won.

The peace was lost because the current guy cut, and ran, and push Climate change,

I hope by Bush and friends you meant Biden,Clinton,and Kerry that ALL voted for it.

Biden went on to become VP

Clinton, and Kerry both went on to become Sec State's.

But,but,but,but, 'Blame Bush' even though that guy hasn't been in office for over eight years.

People need to face facts.

Sanders party foreign policy has been EPIC FAILURES, and so were Clinton's that created the current terrorist problem.

Sanders credited President Barack Obama for his handling of the fight against ISIS, saying that the terrorist organization is "on the defensive. They are retreating."




Strange how ISIS only started "retreating" after Russia got involved.

Obama has failed on all fronts of the ISIS agenda.

Dafuq?

a reply to: xuenchen

Strange how ISIS only started "retreating" after Russia got involved.

Not so strange considering just exactly who, and what the Obama administration had been bombing.

Made famous during Johnson's Vietnam war. Where under his orders the military was ordered to bomb empty buildings, and fields.

If ISIS 'is' retreating. It means they have went back to the same old playbook.

They can't fight head on so they infiltrate, and destroy from within. Brussels is a example of it in action.

The same playbook terrorists have been using for over 40 years.

a reply to: markosity1973

Did your hear Mc Cain say we got to turn this thing (in Syria) around? They won't ever give up. If they can't libya-ize Syria by insurgency or proxy, they'll do it with direct US involvement. Probably after the election.

Much harder for the Russians to justify bombing US soldiers in Syria.

a reply to: neo96

Except the difference between Johnson and Vetnam and (insert new presiders name here), Syria doesn't have any jungle canopy to hide under, its a desert.

a reply to: neo96

EXACTLY MY POINT!!!!

thanks xue, neo!!

originally posted by: xuenchen
Strange how ISIS only started "retreating" after Russia got involved.

Pretty sure Russia hasn't bombed any ISIS targets. At all.

Russian Airstrikes in Syria Seem to Be Hurting Civilians More Than ISIS

Russians Strike Targets in Syria, but Not ISIS Areas

Syrian opposition faction: Russia is bombing civilians, not ISIS

'More than 90%' of Russian airstrikes in Syria have not targeted Isis, US says

Reports: Russian Airstrikes Not Targeting ISIS - Breitbart

But hey, don't let me stop you from your Putin cheer leading.