How To Prove The Bible Is A Fairytale


a reply to: windword

Crucifixion at Golgotha just means that it is a mental process and the skull or in the brain is the only place Jesus was crucified.

Some things are too obvious that they are hiding in plain sight and nobody notices.

originally posted by: angus1745
It is a tool for the church to control the population and to steal land and money from them. That is all it is, ever was, and ever will be.

If it's a tool for the church to control the population why did said church (the Roman Catholic Hierarchy) do everything in their power and beyond to prevent people from reading said bible in their own language (something that was still done and led to the period of the Reformation and the Roman Catholics losing more and more control as more and more people started reading the bible for themselves seeing the Roman Catholic control and brainwashing system being exposed in the bible).

You're not awake, you'll never wake up if you view the bible as a faery tale.

And why are they still doing that along with the Protestants now, whose disrespect for what the bible really teaches is painfully obvious to me when they go on selling their Trinitarian philosophies and theology?

Probably should have included the video above in my comment before.

I realize this is an old thread, but I thought I add some information.
Actually I'm surprised it's yet to be mentioned.

Professor Ron Wyatt extensive research not only found the
location of the ark of the covenant, but that it was directly
below the area where Christ was crucified. His team's excavations
found a crack where the blood of Christ is supposed to have
dripped down upon the ark.

Mr Wyatt even did a Chromosome test for the ‘blood’ sample that
he collected. The conclusion for the test was quite fascinating.

I doubt those who deem Bible truths but a fairytale will take any
time to read or research his findings. But for everyone else, enjoy.

www.youtube.com...
(begins at 0.45)

www.youtube.com...

www.ronwyatt.com...

a reply to: MrBlaq

His team's excavations found a crack where the blood of Christ is supposed to have dripped down upon the ark.

You do realize that Jesus, if he existed, and if the story is true, was crucified outside the Jerusalem city walls, somewhere between 30 and 39AD? Do you also realize that during the Siege of Jerusalem, around 70AD, no less that 6000 Jewish men were also crucified outside the city walls? That's a lot of 2000 year old blood, dripping through the cracks!

a reply to: windword

You do realize that Jesus, if he existed, and if the story is true, was
crucified outside the Jerusalem city walls, somewhere between 30 and 39AD?
Do you also realize that during the Siege of Jerusalem, around 70AD, no less
that 6000 Jewish men were also crucified outside the city walls? That's a lot
of 2000 year old blood, dripping through the cracks!

Your statement is typical of those who make an opinion without even taking
time to look at the evidence. The video I provided would have helped you
not to insinuate such a silly idea. Try looking at Dr Wyatt's proof and
the chromosome test he elaborated upon. I dare you to watch it,
but you wont because your Satanically derived Humanist conceptions
of life prevent you.

a reply to: MrBlaq

Pretty sure Ron Wyatt was proven to be a fraud multiple times...

I've seen all of his videos... they're interesting but mostly all hearsay

a reply to: MrBlaq

Your statement is typical of those who make an opinion without even taking time to look at the evidence.

Your evidence isn't new, actually it was never even produced to be verified. It's ridiculous superstition, and old news that's been debunked and Ron Wyatt is no longer with us.

Ron Wyatt Information Resources

The video I provided would have helped you not to insinuate such a silly idea.

What silly idea?

a reply to: windword

What silly idea?

I'll go a step further and define why you and others attack Biblical truth.

All rejection of God and Biblical truths is based on Humanism.
The differentiation between Humanistic concepts and Satanism is a
distinction without a difference, they are one in the same, simply
two sides of the same coin.

And hence why you and others fail to understand the Humanistic
hegelian dialectic that's been foisted upon society through humanism,
that is undermining everything honest and true in America.

In your disbelief of truth and God you unwittingly advocate the
cesspool of degenerates between homosexual to pedophilia to the
insanity of gender deconstruction transgendered, because you deny
moral truth that is God.

What you fail to understand is you have no morality outside of God.
Denying God always leads to what we have today in society - complete
and utter MADNESS. You'll continue to view your world inside of a
situational ethics box and help destroy society because you hate God
and his Biblical truth.

Your idea of justice is to MURDER, MAIM, and DESTROY your enemy.

WHY?

As stated above, because without God you devolve into delusions.

Thanks for giving me the opportunity to clarify the genesis
of your opinions.

a reply to: MrBlaq

So let me get this straight...

Without the bible there is no morality...

All who reject said book are Satans minions...

Is that about right?

a reply to: Akragon

So let me get this straight...

Without the bible there is no morality...

All who reject said book are Satans minions...

Is that about right?

In a nutshell, yes.

I could quote a hundred scriptures to prove my point.
But no sense in wasting scriptures when history
and life itself proves all the ungodly are followers
of their master - Satan

a reply to: MrBlaq

You can say such things while knowing absolutely nothing about Satan eh?

The bible says hardly anything about him, yet you boldly proclaim all that don't agree with the book are followers of said unknown entity

Seems to me you're just using the bible to hide bigotry

And by the way, history rarely proves the bible... and science, even logic definitively prove many stories in the bible didn't happen

interesting... can i also assume you are a supporter of the "infallibility doctrine"?

a reply to: Akragon


I'm going to assume you've never read the Bible, since it
has an incredible amount of substance referring to the
diabolical one.

If you're referring to whether or not the Pope can be infallible,
absolutely NOT. No man is infallible, especially not the
demonic cult of Roman Catholicism.

originally posted by: MrBlaq
a reply to: Akragon

So let me get this straight...

Without the bible there is no morality...

All who reject said book are Satans minions...

Is that about right?

In a nutshell, yes.

I could quote a hundred scriptures to prove my point.

I bet you can't. There's barely any references to Satan in the bible.

But no sense in wasting scriptures when history
and life itself proves all the ungodly are followers
of their master - Satan

That's a very bold statement backed up with zero facts. Maybe you should add some?

a reply to: MrBlaq

Brother...

i've probably read the bible, and every book within more times then you've opened it

Careful what you assume... you clearly do not know who you're speaking to

If you're referring to whether or not the Pope can be infallible,
absolutely NOT. No man is infallible, especially not the
demonic cult of Roman Catholicism.

No im referring to the book... whatever version you prefer

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: MrBlaq

Brother...

i've probably read the bible, and every book within more times then you've opened it

Careful what you assume... you clearly do not know who you're speaking to

Maybe you have, I've been on a steady diet that helps me to
read the Bible 7 times a year. At least since 1982.

a reply to: MrBlaq

I'll go a step further and define why you and others attack Biblical truth.

What biblical truth have I attacked in this thread?

Here's review:
My Posts

originally posted by: MrBlaq

originally posted by: Akragon
a reply to: MrBlaq

Brother...

i've probably read the bible, and every book within more times then you've opened it

Careful what you assume... you clearly do not know who you're speaking to

Maybe you have, I've been on a steady diet that helps me to
read the Bible 7 times a year. At least since 1982.

And yet you managed to skip the part that says "thou shall not judge" every time

Nifty coincidence...

a reply to: Akragon

They (Christians) always do. They're the most judgmental bunch of people I've ever had the displeasure of knowing.

Maybe the need to adapt WWJD?

ETA: OK, maybe not ALL Christians. That was a bit over the top. Most Christians.

a reply to: Akragon

And yet you managed to skip the part that says "thou shall not judge" every time

Nifty coincidence...

Apparently you fail to understand the Apostles Paul instruction when
he wrote 2Tim 4:2 Preach the word; be instant in season, out of season;
REPROVE, rebuke, exhort with all longsuffering and doctrine.

AND

Eph 5:11 And have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkness, but rather
REPROVE them.